Official statement
Other statements from this video 29 ▾
- □ Does a bloated robots.txt file really hurt your SEO rankings?
- □ Does it really matter whether you submit your sitemap in robots.txt or Search Console?
- □ Do H1-H6 heading tags really still impact Google rankings?
- □ Is a strict heading tag hierarchy really necessary for SEO rankings?
- □ How long does Google actually take to fully process a domain migration?
- □ Can a site migration really boost your SEO rankings or destroy them completely?
- □ Does Googlebot really crawl from just one place when indexing your geo-targeted content?
- □ Can a noindex tag on geolocalized pages wipe your entire website from Google search results?
- □ Should you really ditch geo-redirects for a simple dynamic banner?
- □ How many location pages can you create before Google penalizes you for spam?
- □ Should you redirect mobile users to your app—and what are the hidden SEO risks?
- □ Do you really need to translate your pages word-for-word for hreflang to work effectively?
- □ Does the domain directive in your Disavow file really help you bypass Google's 2MB limit?
- □ Should you really use the Disavow tool only for purchased links?
- □ Should you noindex your internal search results pages to prevent spammers from creating backlinks?
- □ Does semantic HTML really boost your search rankings?
- □ Is AMP still a ranking factor in Google Search?
- □ Is AMP really a ranking factor for Google?
- □ Should you test removing your Disavow file incrementally, or can you delete it all at once?
- □ Why do knowledge panels display differently across devices and search contexts?
- □ Does Google's synonym system really work without any human intervention?
- □ Should you really create a separate page for each location to implement Local Business schema correctly?
- □ Do you really need to mark up ALL your content with structured data?
- □ Do you really need to display all FAQ schema questions visibly on your page?
- □ Can hidden accordion content really show up in featured snippets?
- □ Why does Google deliberately choose not to index your entire website?
- □ Should you delete pages to boost your site's indexation?
- □ Does search volume of anchor text really impact the value of your internal links?
- □ Should you really add unique content to your e-commerce product pages?
Googlebot automatically redistributes the crawl budget previously allocated to AMP pages toward traditional HTML pages after AMP removal. This reallocation happens naturally, without requiring any manual intervention. For sites that have discontinued AMP, this means potentially more crawl activity on standard pages.
What you need to understand
Why was Google crawling AMP pages so frequently?
AMP pages required frequent refreshes of their cache on Google's side to ensure consistency of displayed content. This AMP cache was an intermediate layer between your server and the end user.
Googlebot therefore regularly passed through to check for updates, consuming a portion of the crawl budget total allocated to your domain. This frequency was generally higher than that of classic HTML pages, due to reasons inherent to AMP's infrastructure.
What actually happens after you remove AMP?
Once AMP pages are removed, Google obviously can no longer crawl them. However, the overall crawl volume assigned to your site doesn't decrease—it automatically redistributes toward traditional pages.
In other words, Googlebot will dedicate this freed-up crawl time to exploring your standard HTML pages more frequently or more deeply. It's a transparent reallocation, with no special configuration needed on your end.
What are the impacts on indexation?
This redistribution means your standard pages can be refreshed more often in Google's index. For sites with content that evolves rapidly, this is a net advantage.
On the other hand, if your technical architecture has weaknesses (slow pages, 500 errors, chained redirects), this surplus of crawl risks exposing these issues more quickly. Let's be honest: intensified crawl is only beneficial if the infrastructure can handle it.
- Automatic reallocation of crawl budget to HTML pages after AMP removal
- No manual intervention required on your part
- Potential for increased refreshing of content in the index
- Requires solid technical infrastructure to absorb this additional crawl
- Particularly advantageous for sites with evolving content
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?
In principle, yes. We do indeed observe increased crawl on standard pages after AMP abandonment across several audited sites. However, the extent of this increase varies greatly depending on site size and the proportion of initial AMP pages.
What's missing here—and it's frustrating—is the exact timing. How long does this reallocation take to become effective? A week? A month? Mueller doesn't specify. [To verify] in your own logs after migration.
Should you expect an immediate indexation boost?
No, and this is where many risk making a mistake. Crawl redistribution doesn't guarantee better indexation if your standard pages have quality or relevance issues.
Google will crawl more, certainly. But if the content is poor, duplicated, or technically deficient, you won't see any positive effect. Crawl is a necessary condition, not a sufficient one.
Which sites truly benefit from this effect?
Editorial sites with high publication frequency get the most out of this reallocation. If you publish daily and your content evolves quickly, this additional crawl accelerates their rise in the index.
Conversely, a brochure website with ten quasi-static pages will probably see no notable difference. Business context matters enormously here—and Mueller, as often, remains quite generalist in his response.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you check in your crawl logs after AMP removal?
First step: analyze your log files over a 30 to 60-day period after AMP removal. Compare the crawl frequency of HTML pages before and after. Use tools like Screaming Frog Log File Analyser or OnCrawl to visualize this evolution.
Pay particular attention to HTTP response codes. If you notice an abnormal rise in 500 or 503 errors, your server is struggling to absorb the crawl surplus. You'll then need to adjust your infrastructure capacity or moderate crawl via Google Search Console.
How can you optimize your site to absorb this redistributed crawl?
Ensure your server response time stays under 200 ms for priority pages. Googlebot doesn't like to wait—and excessive crawl on slow pages creates frustration on the bot side and wastes crawl budget.
Also review your internal linking. If certain important pages were primarily accessible through AMP, verify they remain well-linked from your standard HTML pages. Without this, the redistributed crawl risks missing them.
- Analyze crawl logs over 30-60 days post-AMP removal
- Compare crawl frequency before/after to identify redistribution
- Verify your server absorbs the load without 500/503 errors
- Optimize server response times (target: <200 ms)
- Audit internal linking to ensure accessibility of priority pages
- Use Google Search Console to adjust crawl if needed
- Monitor indexation evolution via coverage reports
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Le crawl redistribué se fait-il instantanément après suppression d'AMP ?
Faut-il faire une action particulière dans Search Console après avoir supprimé AMP ?
Un site sans AMP peut-il perdre du crawl si un concurrent en garde ?
Est-ce que cette redistribution améliore automatiquement le classement SEO ?
Les pages AMP redirigées en 301 vers les pages classiques consomment-elles encore du crawl ?
🎥 From the same video 29
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 14/01/2022
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.