What does Google say about SEO? /

Official statement

Adding noscript tags containing links to content similar to what is present in JavaScript is not considered cloaking by Google. It is an acceptable solution to make links crawlable.
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

💬 EN 📅 19/07/2021 ✂ 20 statements
Watch on YouTube →
Other statements from this video 19
  1. Why does Google tend to overlook NoScript tags in SEO?
  2. Why Doesn’t Hreflang Affect Your SEO Rankings?
  3. Can Geotargeting Really Boost Your Local SEO?
  4. Why is it essential to promote your international pages individually for SEO?
  5. How should you handle canonicals for international versions?
  6. Why does Google recommend using a JavaScript banner instead of geographic redirections?
  7. Why does Google simplify the canonicalization of queries in Search Console?
  8. Does Google rewrite your meta descriptions to better match search queries?
  9. Could empty content pages actually be hurting your SEO rankings?
  10. Why is meaningful content essential for preventing soft 404s?
  11. Could your crawl budget be restricted by server speed and quality issues?
  12. Could cutting down the number of pages actually boost your SEO?
  13. Why does Google take several months to reevaluate your site?
  14. Could using nofollow on internal links actually enhance your SEO strategy?
  15. Why should you avoid marking third-party reviews in structured data?
  16. Is it worth using structured data without Rich Results for SEO?
  17. Why are breadcrumb structured data essential for SEO?
  18. Does the age of a website really influence its SEO ranking?
  19. Does the text/code ratio really influence SEO rankings?
📅
Official statement from (4 years ago)
TL;DR

The noscript tag, used with links to the same content as in JavaScript, is not considered cloaking by Google. This allows links to be crawlable without indexing issues.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

La balise noscript peut-elle affecter mon classement?
Non, si elle est utilisée pour refléter le même contenu que JavaScript, elle n'affecte pas le classement.
Faut-il remplacer tout le JavaScript par noscript?
Pas nécessairement, mais l'ajout de noscript aux côtés de JavaScript rend le contenu plus accessible pour Googlebot.
Google peut-il intégrer du contenu uniquement dans noscript?
Non, Google préfère un accès via JavaScript; noscript est une solution de secours.
🏷 Related Topics
Content Crawl & Indexing AI & SEO JavaScript & Technical SEO Links & Backlinks Pagination & Structure Penalties & Spam

🎥 From the same video 19

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 19/07/2021

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.