Official statement
Site Reputation Abuse refers to the publishing of third-party content without oversight from the main owner, regardless of the type of domain used (.co.jp or otherwise). It’s not about the domain, but about editorial control.
35:32
Other statements from this video 31 ▾
- 5:03 Why does the removal tool only temporarily conceal your content?
- 7:00 Is the removal tool really a magic fix for your URLs?
- 7:07 Does a temporary URL removal really take effect within 24 hours?
- 9:16 How can you effectively leverage Google's removal tool?
- 10:54 Did you know that Google removes multiple versions of a URL at once?
- 11:05 Did you know that Google's URL removal tool can impact 4 versions at once?
- 11:58 Should you be worried about prefix deletion affecting your SEO traffic?
- 14:03 Why is the removal tool not suitable for normalizing URLs?
- 14:03 Why is the removal tool unsuitable for canonicalization?
- 14:36 Why should you avoid the removal tool during site migrations?
- 15:16 Why is it crucial to redirect during a site migration?
- 16:06 What’s the best way to permanently delete content without leaving any SEO traces?
- 17:12 Is it true that deleting URLs won't fix your manual penalties?
- 27:42 What Should You Do with Empty Pages to Optimize Your SEO?
- 29:51 How does Mobile-First Indexing affect your mobile SEO?
- 29:51 Does having separate URLs for mobile and desktop really hurt your images?
- 30:51 Could Mobile-First Indexing be harming your SEO traffic?
- 32:58 Why are ranking fluctuations a normal part of SEO?
- 32:58 Why do Google rankings keep changing?
- 34:32 Why is Google focused on site reputation abuse regardless of the domain?
- 36:37 Should you use noindex on hosted third-party pages to stay in Google's good graces?
- 37:37 Should you use 'noindex' to manage hosted content and protect your site's reputation?
- 39:44 Is relying on an expired domain's past ranking a bad move?
- 39:44 Does buying an expired domain really boost your SEO?
- 40:18 Why won't Google reveal their anti-spam criteria?
- 40:18 Why does Google keep its spam policies under wraps in SEO?
- 42:58 What are the risks of blocking images in robots.txt for your SEO?
- 42:59 Is it really impossible to selectively target image indexing?
- 45:39 Why does Google separate web indexing and image indexing?
- 46:44 How can you regain Google's trust using lastmod tags?
- 46:44 Can we really count on the lastmod field in sitemaps again?
Official statement from
(2 years ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic
Are White Label Coupon Sites Doomed by Google's Latest Crackdown?
View statement →
TL;DR
Google clarifies that site reputation abuse is linked to content management, not domain type. It's the editorial practices that matter, not the domain extension.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Que faire si j'ai déjà été affecté par l'abus de réputation?
Revoyez tous les contenus publiés par des tiers, assurez-vous de leur conformité, et envisagez une stratégie de détection et de correction régulière.
Le type de domaine a-t-il des impacts sur d'autres aspects SEO?
Le type de domaine peut influencer la perception des utilisateurs, mais pas directement l'algorithme de Google.
Comment Google détecte-t-il l'abus de réputation?
Google utilise des algorithmes complexes qui surveillent l'intégrité et la pertinence du contenu. La supervision humaine peut contribuer à signaler des anomalies.
🎥 From the same video 31
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 49 min · published on 30/05/2024
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.