Official statement
Other statements from this video 22 ▾
- □ Pourquoi la position moyenne de Search Console ne reflète-t-elle pas un classement théorique mais des affichages réels ?
- □ Peut-on encore se permettre d'attendre qu'un classement instable se stabilise tout seul ?
- □ Faut-il vraiment produire plus de contenu pour améliorer son SEO ?
- □ Où placer son sitemap XML pour optimiser son crawl ?
- □ Faut-il vraiment utiliser l'outil d'inspection d'URL pour indexer un nouveau site ?
- □ Combien de temps faut-il attendre pour voir les backlinks dans Search Console ?
- □ Pourquoi les données Search Console et Analytics ne concordent-elles jamais vraiment ?
- □ Search Console collecte-t-elle vraiment toutes les données sur les gros sites e-commerce ?
- □ Faut-il vraiment préférer noindex à disallow pour contrôler l'indexation ?
- □ Les produits en rupture de stock peuvent-ils vraiment être traités comme des soft 404 par Google ?
- □ Les outils de test Google crawlent-ils vraiment en temps réel ou utilisent-ils un cache ?
- □ Google utilise-t-il des algorithmes différents selon votre secteur d'activité ?
- □ Pourquoi Google ignore-t-il les sites agrégateurs de faible effort ?
- □ Google compte-t-il vraiment les clics sur les rich results comme des clics organiques ?
- □ L'ordre des liens dans le HTML influence-t-il vraiment la priorité de crawl de Google ?
- □ Faut-il vraiment éviter les URLs avec paramètres pour le SEO ?
- □ Pourquoi robots.txt bloque le crawl mais n'empêche pas l'indexation de vos pages ?
- □ Les produits en rupture de stock nuisent-ils au classement global de votre site e-commerce ?
- □ Le contenu dupliqué partiel pénalise-t-il vraiment vos pages ?
- □ Pourquoi Google refuse-t-il d'indexer plusieurs versions d'une même page malgré une canonicalisation correcte ?
- □ Comment Google choisit-il réellement quelle URL canoniser parmi vos contenus dupliqués ?
- □ Les mentions de marque sans lien ont-elles une valeur SEO ?
Google only counts a link if both the source AND destination are canonical URLs that are indexed. If either one is missing from the index, the link is simply ignored — it disappears from Google's systems. In practice: a backlink from a deindexed page has zero value, and pointing to a blocked or non-indexed page transfers nothing.
What you need to understand
What does "indexed canonical URL" really mean?
Google only works with canonical URLs — the reference version of a page that Google has decided to display in its search results. If you have multiple variants of the same page (HTTP/HTTPS, www/non-www, URL parameters), Google picks one as canonical.
Indexation is the fact that Google has actually stored this URL in its database and considers it eligible to appear in search results. Without indexation, there is no consideration — neither for content nor for links.
What exactly happens to a link where one end is missing?
Mueller is categorical: the link disappears. Google doesn't know what to do with it, so it completely ignores it. No PageRank transfer, no authority signal, no thematic signal. The link is as useful as a nofollow link multiplied by zero.
Let's be honest — we already knew that a backlink from a deindexed page had no weight. What Mueller confirms here is that this is also true for the destination: pointing to a non-indexed page creates no SEO benefit, even if the source is powerful.
Why does Google work this way?
The search engine works with a link graph between indexed URLs. Each link is an edge between two nodes in this graph. If a node doesn't exist (non-indexed page), the edge cannot exist either — it leads nowhere or comes from nowhere.
This is a fundamental architectural constraint: Google cannot assign value to a link without knowing both endpoints. It does not store "pending links" in hopes that a page will be indexed later.
- A link only exists in Google's systems if both source AND destination are indexed
- The URL must be the canonical version recognized by Google, not a variant
- A backlink from a deindexed page = zero SEO value
- An internal link to a blocked page (robots.txt, noindex) = useless for PageRank
- Google does not "set aside" links waiting for indexation — they disappear
SEO Expert opinion
Is this rule consistent with what we observe in the field?
Completely. Tests conducted by the SEO community have confirmed for years that a backlink from a deindexed page brings strictly nothing. We see this regularly with sites that get links from directories or aggregators whose pages are never indexed — zero impact.
What's interesting is that Mueller also emphasizes the destination. Some practitioners still think that an internal link to a noindex page "still counts" for site structure. No. If the target page is not indexed, the link transfers nothing and structures nothing in Google's systems.
What are the gray areas in this statement?
Mueller talks about "indexed canonical URLs," but doesn't specify how long a page must remain indexed for its outgoing links to count. If a page is indexed and then quickly deindexed, does it retroactively lose the value of its outgoing links? [To be verified] — no official data on this.
Another point: what about pages in crawl but not in indexation ("Discovered - currently not indexed" status)? Technically, they're not indexed, so links shouldn't count. But if Google crawls them regularly and stores a record of their links while awaiting future indexation? Mueller says no, but on-the-ground observations suggest that some signals can be "pre-calculated" — it's fuzzy.
In what cases does this rule cause problems?
The classic scenario: you have a new site with little authority. Google indexes your pages slowly. For weeks, some are in "Discovered - currently not indexed." During this period, all internal links pointing to these pages are useless — they transmit nothing.
Result: your internal linking doesn't work at full capacity, which further slows down the indexation of pages waiting. This is a vicious circle that many e-commerce or editorial sites suffer without realizing it.
Practical impact and recommendations
How can you verify that your links really count?
First, make sure all your strategic pages are indexed. Use Search Console: "Coverage" or "Pages" section. Any page in "Discovered, currently not indexed" or "Excluded" is useless for internal linking and benefits from no backlink.
Next, check your backlink sources. A link from a site whose pages are never indexed will bring you nothing — even if the domain seems powerful. Cross-reference your backlinks (Ahrefs, Majestic) with the actual indexation status of source pages via a "site:URL" search on Google.
What mistakes must you avoid at all costs?
Don't waste your crawl budget on pages you don't want to index. If you block a section in noindex or robots.txt, avoid heavily linking it from your indexed pages — those links are lost.
Another trap: poorly configured canonicals. If Google chooses a canonical URL different from the one you're targeting, all your internal links pointing to your preferred version are ignored — Google mentally redirects them to the canonical, but it doesn't always work as intended.
What should you concretely do to maximize the value of your links?
- Audit the indexation status of all your pages in Search Console — eliminate "Discovered, currently not indexed"
- Focus your internal linking on pages actually indexed
- Verify that your backlinks come from indexed pages (test "site:URL" on Google)
- Fix canonicals so Google properly recognizes your target URLs
- Avoid heavily pointing to noindex or blocked pages — it serves no purpose
- Relaunch indexation of strategic blocked pages via "Request indexation" in Search Console
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Un lien depuis une page en noindex compte-t-il ?
Que se passe-t-il si la page cible est indexée puis désindexée ?
Un lien interne vers une page « Discovered - currently not indexed » sert-il à quelque chose ?
Comment savoir si mes backlinks proviennent de pages indexées ?
Une canonical mal configurée peut-elle faire perdre des liens ?
🎥 From the same video 22
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 28/03/2022
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.