Official statement
JavaScript is an integral part of the web that brings interactivity, unlike Flash, which was a separate black box. JavaScript is not bad in itself but becomes problematic when misused or overused.
Other statements from this video 13 ▾
- □ Is hidden content truly visible to Google?
- □ Do Google’s third-party tools really impact your SEO?
- □ Why Have #! Fragments Become a No-Go for SEO?
- □ Does JavaScript Really Affect Crawlability?
- □ Why does Google render after crawling?
- □ How Are JavaScript Resource Requests Impacting Your Crawl Budget?
- □ Does blocking the main thread really impact SEO?
- □ Is it possible to avoid cloaking with localized user experiences?
- □ Could using URL fragments for JavaScript modals actually boost your SEO?
- □ Why should you steer clear of inline JavaScript for large SEO scripts?
- □ Is it true that the canonical tag is often overlooked by Google?
- □ Does AMP really affect your website's SEO?
- □ Why is page speed essential for SEO rankings?
Official statement from
(4 years ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic
Why should you remove Flash and Quicksilver plugins from your websites?
View statement →
TL;DR
JavaScript is essential but can be risky if misused. For SEO, mastering its usage is key to avoid indexing errors.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
JavaScript peut-il vraiment nuire au SEO ?
Oui, s'il est mal géré ou empêche l'indexation des contenus.
Comment garantir que JavaScript n'entrave pas l'indexation ?
Testez avec Google Search Console et privilégiez le SSR.
Quelle différence entre JavaScript et Flash aujourd'hui ?
JavaScript est intégré et soutenu par les navigateurs, Flash ne l'était pas.
🎥 From the same video 13
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 26/05/2021
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.