Official statement
For international sites with different language versions, each version constitutes unique content. Each page should have its own canonical tag pointing to itself, even if the content is translated. The canonical is defined by language, while hreflang ensures the linkage between versions.
Other statements from this video 33 ▾
- □ Does translated content really count as unique by Google?
- □ Do multilingual backlinks really build themselves?
- □ Should you really worry about localized URLs for SEO?
- □ Why is active promotion essential for new websites in SEO?
- □ Why is using nofollow in press releases crucial for your SEO?
- □ Should you really worry about negative SEO?
- □ Why is submitting entire domains for disavowal more effective?
- □ Is it true that Google overlooks suspicious links without penalizing SEO?
- □ How can you prevent your pages from being classified as soft 404?
- □ What’s the relationship between Core Web Vitals and soft 404 errors in SEO?
- □ Why does Google sometimes rewrite your meta descriptions without warning?
- □ How does Google tailor your meta descriptions for every search query?
- □ Should you automate meta descriptions for SEO on a large scale?
- □ How does placing key text at the top of HTML enhance your SEO?
- □ Is it true that Core Updates are actually independent of Core Web Vitals?
- □ How will the gradual rollout of Core Web Vitals impact your SEO strategy?
- □ How does hreflang really affect your SEO strategy?
- □ Should You Rethink Your Geographic Content Strategy Due to Doorway Pages?
- □ Why does Google recommend a gradual approach for local pages?
- □ Why Does Google Penalize Published Automatic Translations As They Are?
- □ Why doesn’t Google guarantee the display of rich results?
- □ What Factors Truly Influence Rich Results Quality?
- □ Do Dashes in Domain Names Really Affect SEO?
- □ Is it true that migrating your domain for keywords could backfire on your SEO efforts?
- □ How does the Search Console's URL Inspection Tool change the game for SEO?
- □ Is it true that the HTML lang attribute doesn’t matter for SEO?
- □ Is it true that Google ignores certain lang attributes in your templates?
- □ Is it true that Google treats product pages and articles the same in SEO?
- □ How does Google My Business enhance your local SEO efforts?
- □ How can you effectively optimize your pages for 'near me' searches without complicating your strategy?
- □ How can you leverage free Google Shopping to boost your product visibility?
- □ Is selective internal linking more effective than a massive approach for SEO?
- □ Should You Focus on Profitable Products in Your Internal Linking Strategy?
Official statement from
(5 years ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic
What are the three specific ways to configure your sitemap for maximum Google in...
View statement →
TL;DR
Each language version is unique. Use a canonical tag pointing to itself for each page. Hreflang connects the versions.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Faut-il une balise canonical par langue ?
Oui, chaque version linguistique est unique et doit avoir sa propre balise canonical.
Que fait la balise hreflang ?
Hreflang relie les différentes versions d'un même contenu pour guider l'utilisateur vers la langue appropriée.
Les balises canonical éliminent-elles les doublons ?
Elles clarifient l'unicité des pages mais ne traitent pas les contenus quasiment identiques. Un audit est nécessaire pour optimiser cela.
🎥 From the same video 33
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 23/07/2021
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.