Official statement
Publishers should utilize the Page Experience Report in Search Console to gain valuable insights into the actual user experience and identify problematic URLs that require fixing.
Other statements from this video 9 ▾
- □ Why is AMP no longer needed for the Top Stories carousel?
- □ How do Web Vitals truly impact our SEO rankings?
- □ Why are Google News rules crucial for appearing in Top Stories?
- □ Do you really need structured data for non-AMP content to appear in Top Stories?
- □ Why is Google removing the AMP badge from its search results?
- □ Are Web Vitals Truly an Unfailing Ranking Factor?
- □ How do signed exchanges enhance preloading for non-AMP pages in SEO?
- □ How does the expansion of Top Stories to all web pages change the SEO game?
- □ Why are AMP pages still being preloaded on Google?
Official statement from
(5 years ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic
Should you be concerned about Core Web Vitals measured exclusively on Chrome?
View statement →
TL;DR
Google states that the Page Experience Report in Search Console is essential for understanding user experience. Identify problematic URLs to improve your SEO.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Le Page Experience Report remplace-t-il d'autres outils ?
Non, il complète mais ne remplace pas. Continuez d'utiliser une suite d'outils pour une stratégie SEO complète.
Des erreurs fréquentes dans le rapport affectent-elles le classement ?
Oui, des signaux forts peuvent impacter négativement la visibilité si ignorés.
Le rapport offre-t-il des recommandations de correctifs ?
Il indique les axes d'amélioration mais la mise en œuvre nécessite souvent une intervention technique.
🎥 From the same video 9
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 14/06/2021
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.