Official statement
Other statements from this video 17 ▾
- □ Should Googlebot really ignore cookie consent banners?
- □ Is it true that the URL Removal Tool overlooks the canonical tag?
- □ Is it essential to customize the above-the-fold content for SEO?
- □ Should you worry about domain age for SEO?
- □ Should you worry about private WHOIS information for your SEO?
- □ Does the word count really matter for SEO rankings?
- □ Why does Google limit the data collected on Search Console?
- □ Why does Google rely on field data for Core Web Vitals rankings?
- □ Should you be concerned about the 28-day update delay for Core Web Vitals?
- □ Why isn't A/B testing considered cloaking by Google?
- □ Is it true that Google doesn’t differentiate between WordPress pages and posts in SEO?
- □ Does URL length really have any impact on SEO ranking?
- □ Should you really worry about foreign spam links in Search Console?
- □ Should you really disavow all your incoming links?
- □ How do pagination and breadcrumbs shape Google's understanding of your site?
- □ Are Late 301 Redirects Really Effective in Preserving SEO Authority?
- □ Is it true that AMP is no longer needed for the Top Stories carousel?
Google does not evaluate rankings based on the number of repeated keywords. Natural writing is sufficient. Focus on the main topic, not on variations.
What you need to understand
Why has Google stopped counting keywords?
Google has evolved. Its algorithm better understands context and meaning. Counting keywords is therefore outdated.
Google analyzes the content as a whole rather than fixating on keyword repetitions. Phrase variations are also taken into account.
- The focus should be on content quality.
- Using variations and synonyms enhances understanding.
- This is a holistic approach to content.
How does this approach affect SEO content?
It encourages fluid and relevant writing. The emphasis is now on the user rather than the search engine.
Creating content that addresses user *intentions* takes precedence over keyword stuffing.
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with observed practices?
Yes, tests show that well-structured and semantically rich pages perform better than keyword-heavy content.
SEO professionals must adapt to this reality, where thematic relevance and context outweigh word-for-word matching.[To be verified] Some specific niches may observe an impact from the number of keywords, but this is becoming increasingly rare. Be careful, simply reducing the number of keywords does not guarantee a better ranking. Relevance, quality, and user engagement remain key elements.What nuances should be added?
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you do practically?
Optimize your content by focusing on the main topic rather than forcing keyword repetition.
Developing the semantic cocoon improves bots' understanding.
- Identify primary keywords and their synonyms.
- Ensure that the content is easy to read and engaging.
- Demonstrate natural lexical diversity.
What mistakes should you avoid?
Don't avoid the lexical field altogether. Keep a holistic view.
Don't confuse natural writing with a lack of structure.
SEO optimization can be complex. A professional approach may be necessary to ensure effective implementation of modern SEO strategies.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Le nombre exact de mots-clés a-t-il un impact sur le classement ?
Les variations de mots-clés influencent-elles toujours le SEO ?
Peut-on ignorer complètement les mots-clés ?
🎥 From the same video 17
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 04/06/2021
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.