Official statement
Other statements from this video 20 ▾
- □ Pourquoi Google ne peut-il jamais garantir que vos utilisateurs atterriront sur la bonne version linguistique de votre site ?
- □ Faut-il bannir les redirections automatiques pour les sites multilingues ?
- □ Faut-il bloquer l'exécution JavaScript pour les SPA avec SSR ?
- □ Faut-il baliser les mots étrangers avec l'attribut lang pour le SEO ?
- □ Le contenu dupliqué entraîne-t-il vraiment une pénalité Google ?
- □ Le rel=canonical est-il vraiment pris en compte par Google ou juste une suggestion ignorée ?
- □ Les FAQ dans les articles de blog sont-elles vraiment utiles pour le SEO ?
- □ Hreflang est-il vraiment obligatoire pour gérer un site international ?
- □ Le cache Google a-t-il un impact sur votre référencement ?
- □ Les résultats de recherche localisés : comment Google adapte-t-il vraiment son algorithme selon les pays et les langues ?
- □ Le noindex est-il vraiment inutile pour gérer le budget de crawl ?
- □ Faut-il vraiment se limiter à une seule thématique sur son site pour bien ranker ?
- □ Combien de liens peut-on vraiment mettre sur une page sans pénalité Google ?
- □ Le nombre de mots est-il vraiment inutile pour le référencement ?
- □ Faut-il s'inquiéter de réutiliser les mêmes blocs de texte sur plusieurs pages ?
- □ Google valide-t-il vraiment la traduction automatique sur les sites multilingues ?
- □ Les URLs bloquées par robots.txt mais indexées posent-elles vraiment problème ?
- □ Faut-il vraiment dupliquer le schema Organisation sur toutes les pages du site ?
- □ Les avis auto-hébergés peuvent-ils afficher des étoiles dans les résultats de recherche Google ?
- □ Pourquoi les fusions de sites Web génèrent-elles des résultats imprévisibles aux yeux de Google ?
The referrer URL displayed in Search Console's URL inspection tool simply indicates where Google first discovered a link to a page. This data is purely historical and has no influence on your rankings. It may even point to an old HTTP version while your site is now HTTPS.
What you need to understand
What exactly is the referrer URL in Search Console?
Search Console's URL inspection tool displays information called the "referrer URL". It's simply the page where Googlebot found the first link pointing to the URL you're inspecting.
This data is stored in Google's history. It can therefore date back several months or years, even if the referring page no longer exists or has been modified since. It's an archived trace of Googlebot's discovery journey.
Why might this URL seem outdated or inconsistent?
You're inspecting a modern HTTPS page and the referrer URL points to an old HTTP page? That's normal. Google preserves the information of the first link discovered historically, not the most recent one.
This URL may even come from a deleted page, an old site design, or a migrated domain. It is never updated to reflect the current state of your internal linking structure.
Does this information have any impact on SEO?
No. John Mueller is explicit: this data is purely informational. It plays no role in ranking calculations, internal PageRank, or current indexation.
Google uses the links it finds today to evaluate your site, not those it discovered three years ago. The referrer URL displayed in Search Console is technical archaeology, nothing more.
- The referrer URL shows where Googlebot first discovered a link to a page
- This information may date back several years and point to obsolete pages
- It has no impact on rankings or current indexation
- Google uses recently discovered links to evaluate your site, not historical traces
- Don't waste time trying to correct this referrer URL—it's pointless
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?
Yes, completely. I've come across dozens of cases where the referrer URL pointed to HTTP pages migrated long ago, or even to old domains. No negative impact observed on the rankings of these pages.
Some SEO professionals sometimes worry about seeing a "broken" or outdated referrer URL, thinking Google still considers that link. Mueller's statement closes the debate: this data is archived but inactive in the algorithm.
Why does Google keep this information if it's useless?
Good question. My theory: it's an internal debug data point exposed in Search Console without real practical value for webmasters. Google historically has a communication problem between its teams—some metrics displayed in GSC are more technical relics than actionable tools.
Let's be honest: if this metric had real impact, Google would update it in real-time. The fact that it remains frozen in the past confirms its purely informational nature.
In what cases might this referrer URL still be useful?
It can be helpful during a migration audit. If you find referrer URLs pointing to an old domain or old site structure, it confirms that Google crawled these old versions—useful for understanding your crawl history.
Another marginal use: detecting where your initial discoveries came from. If a strategic page was discovered via a low-quality external link rather than through your internal linking, that may indicate an initial crawlability problem—but be careful, this is archaeology, not current diagnostics.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you actually do with this information?
Nothing. Literally nothing. Don't waste time trying to "fix" this referrer URL or update it. It's not a signal considered by Google's algorithm.
Focus your efforts on links currently being crawled: your internal linking structure, recent backlinks, navigation structure. That's where your SEO performance is determined.
What mistakes should you avoid?
First mistake: panicking when you see an obsolete or broken referrer URL. Some SEO professionals create redirects or modify their linking structure to "fix" this URL—that's wasted effort.
Second mistake: using this metric as a SEO health indicator. It doesn't reflect the current state of your crawl or your internal popularity.
How can you verify that your current links are being recognized?
Use the "Links" report in Search Console to see backlinks and internal links currently indexed. This is the reliable source for auditing your link profile.
For internal linking, crawl your site with Screaming Frog or Oncrawl. Compare click depths and verify that your strategic pages receive sufficient recent internal links.
- Ignore the referrer URL displayed in the inspection tool—it has no SEO impact
- Don't create redirects or corrections to "fix" an outdated referrer URL
- Focus on the "Links" report in Search Console to audit your current backlinks
- Crawl your site regularly to verify the quality of your internal linking structure
- Make sure your strategic pages are well-discovered through your current navigation
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Dois-je corriger une URL référente qui pointe vers une ancienne page HTTP ?
L'URL référente peut-elle expliquer un problème d'indexation ?
Le rapport Liens de Search Console affiche-t-il aussi des données obsolètes ?
Pourquoi Google affiche-t-il cette information si elle est inutile ?
Cette URL référente peut-elle servir lors d'une migration de site ?
🎥 From the same video 20
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 21/10/2022
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.