Official statement
Link list distribution can be seen as link spam. Google uses links as a relevance factor, but links intended to manipulate rankings are considered link spam, including the manipulation of inbound and outbound links.
4:40
Other statements from this video 8 ▾
- 1:00 Is Google tightening its grip on site reputation abuse?
- 2:40 How does Google assess reputation abuse for websites?
- 5:40 Has Buying Links Really Become Useless for SEO?
- 6:48 Should you really worry about noindex and 404 alerts in Search Console?
- 8:25 Could SafeSearch really impact your SEO visibility?
- 9:29 Does hreflang on A tags really not work with Google?
- 10:32 Why is your site losing ground on generic queries while brand queries remain unaffected?
- 12:40 Why is it so challenging to gauge performance on Discover?
Official statement from
(1 year ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic
Should You Really Worry About a Massive Loss of Backlinks for Your SEO?
View statement →
TL;DR
Google views link list distribution as link spam. Links aimed at manipulating rankings are penalized. For SEO, avoiding mass distribution is crucial.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Les backlinks sont-ils encore importants pour le référencement ?
Oui, bien sûr. Les backlinks de qualité restent un des facteurs de classement majeurs selon Google.
Qu'est-ce qu'un lien considéré comme spam ?
Tout lien créé dans l'intention de manipuler le classement et non basé sur la pertinence ou la qualité du contenu.
Google pénalise-t-il automatique chaque site impliqué dans des schémas de liens ?
Pas systématiquement, mais les sites participant à ces pratiques risquent des pénalités manuelles ou algorithmiques.
🎥 From the same video 8
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 16 min · published on 28/11/2024
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.