What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 3 questions

Less than 30 seconds. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~30s 🎯 3 questions 📚 SEO Google

Official statement

You must not use aggregated reviews from a specific service and transmit them to Google via structured data for products. The technical guidelines for reviews specifically prohibit this practice, which would make pages ineligible for review results.
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

💬 EN 📅 21/08/2024 ✂ 20 statements
Watch on YouTube →
Other statements from this video 19
  1. Google indexe-t-il vraiment toutes les langues de la même manière ?
  2. Les liens nofollow et balises noindex nuisent-ils à votre référencement ?
  3. Les erreurs 404 pénalisent-elles vraiment le classement de votre site ?
  4. Faut-il vraiment rediriger toutes les pages 404 pour améliorer son SEO ?
  5. La vitesse de votre CDN d'images pénalise-t-elle vraiment votre référencement dans Google Images ?
  6. Peut-on réinitialiser les données Search Console d'un site repris ?
  7. Les sous-domaines régionaux suffisent-ils à cibler un marché géographique ?
  8. Pourquoi vos rich results affichent-ils la mauvaise devise et comment y remédier ?
  9. La transcription vidéo est-elle considérée comme du contenu dupliqué par Google ?
  10. Google crawle-t-il les variations d'URL sans liens internes ou backlinks ?
  11. Pourquoi Googlebot persiste-t-il à crawler des pages 404 après leur suppression ?
  12. Le ratio texte/code est-il vraiment un facteur de classement Google ?
  13. Les paramètres UTM avec medium=referral tuent-ils vraiment la valeur SEO d'un backlink ?
  14. Faut-il absolument répondre aux commentaires de blog pour le SEO ?
  15. Faut-il s'inquiéter quand robots.txt apparaît comme soft 404 dans Search Console ?
  16. Faut-il vraiment s'inquiéter de l'absence de balises X-Robots-Tag et meta robots ?
  17. Pourquoi les redirections Geo IP automatiques sabotent-elles votre SEO international ?
  18. Modifier ses balises title et meta description peut-il vraiment faire bouger son classement Google ?
  19. Les liens ou le trafic de mauvaise qualité peuvent-ils nuire à la réputation de votre site ?
📅
Official statement from (1 year ago)
TL;DR

Google explicitly prohibits importing reviews from third-party platforms (Trustpilot, Avis Vérifiés, etc.) and marking them up as structured data on your product pages. This practice makes your pages ineligible for review rich snippets. Only native reviews collected directly on your site are permitted.

What you need to understand

What is the exact rule stated by Google?

Martin Splitt is explicit: aggregated reviews from an external service must not be transmitted to Google via Review or AggregateRating structured data types on product pages. This prohibition is stated clearly in Google's technical guidelines.

Concretely, if you retrieve ratings from Trustpilot, Avis Vérifiés, Google Customer Reviews, or any other aggregator, and inject them into your Schema.org markup, you are violating the rules. Google considers this practice an attempt to manipulate rich snippets.

Why does this restriction exist?

Google wants to prevent merchants from artificially stacking reviews from multiple sources to inflate their displayed ratings in the SERPs. The goal is to ensure that the stars displayed reflect the real user experience on the site in question — not a composite aggregate from third-party platforms.

Another reason: preventing abuse. Some e-commerce businesses were using external review services to circumvent Google's moderation and transparency requirements. By restricting to native reviews, Google maintains quality control over what appears in its results.

What is still permitted then?

You can mark up reviews collected directly on your site, via your own rating system or an integrated widget that stores data with you. The essential point is that the review is published on your domain and users can view it without being redirected to a third-party platform.

Reviews from your Google Business Profile listing remain eligible for local rich snippets, but they should not be manually re-injected into your site's product markup. These are two separate contexts.

  • Prohibited: Importing reviews from Trustpilot, Avis Vérifiés, Yelp, etc. and marking them up as Schema.org Review/AggregateRating
  • Prohibited: Displaying average ratings from external aggregators in your product structured data
  • Permitted: Marking up reviews collected natively on your site, visible directly on your product pages
  • Permitted: Using Google Business Profile reviews in local rich snippets (but not in e-commerce product markup)
  • Gray area: Third-party widgets that display AND host reviews on your domain — the line is blurry

SEO Expert opinion

Is this guideline consistent with what we observe in the field?

Yes and no. Google does apply manual actions against sites that abuse external aggregated reviews. We've seen e-commerce businesses lose their stars overnight after injecting Trustpilot ratings into their Schema.org.

But — and this is where it gets tricky — automated detection still seems erratic. Some sites openly violate this rule for months without visible penalty. Others get flagged within weeks. [To verify]: Google has never communicated the triggering thresholds or detection methods. We're flying blind.

What nuances should be added to this statement?

First point: the wording "reviews aggregated from a specific service" leaves room for doubt. If you use a third-party widget that collects reviews but publishes them directly on your domain (without redirection), are you in violation? Technically, the review is visible on your site. But collection is outsourced.

Google has never clarified this edge case. My interpretation — based on 15 years in the field — is that what matters is where the review is first published. If it appears first on Trustpilot and then is re-imported to you, that's a no. If it's collected by a third party but published only on your site, it passes. But again: [To verify] due to lack of precise official documentation.

Caution: Some WordPress or Shopify plugins automatically import third-party reviews and inject them into Schema.org markup without your knowledge. Check your source code — you might be in violation without realizing it.

In what cases does this rule not apply?

Reviews on your Google Business Profile listing are not subject to this restriction — they feed local rich snippets (local pack, Google Maps) but should not be manually re-injected into your e-commerce product pages.

Third-party review platforms can still mark up their own pages with reviews they host. A site like Trustpilot can display stars in the SERPs for its own URLs. It's only cross-domain imports that are prohibited.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you do concretely right now?

First step: audit your current Schema.org markup. Inspect your product pages with Google's Rich Results Test. Verify that marked-up reviews actually come from your own rating system, not from a Trustpilot import or equivalent.

If you use a CMS (WordPress, Shopify, PrestaShop), disable plugins that automatically inject external reviews into structured data. Many merchants get caught by poorly configured third-party extensions.

Next: implement a native review collection system. This can be a module integrated into your e-commerce platform, a custom widget, or a SaaS solution that publishes reviews directly on your domain. The key is that the review is visible on your site without redirection to an external platform.

What errors must you absolutely avoid?

Do not attempt to "hide" the origin of reviews by modifying Schema.org metadata. Google cross-references structured data with visible content — if your markup shows 4.8/5 stars but the page displays Trustpilot reviews at 4.2/5, you'll be flagged.

Also avoid combining multiple review sources on the same product page. Displaying both your native reviews AND a Trustpilot widget creates confusion — and if you mark up both, you're in violation. Choose one source and stick with it.

How can you verify your site is compliant?

Use Google's Rich Results Test: paste your product page URLs and verify that detected Review/AggregateRating data matches the reviews actually visible on the page. If the tool reports errors or warnings about reviews, investigate further.

Also monitor your Search Console: in the "Enhancements > Product Reviews" section, Google flags ineligible pages and reasons. If you see "Reviews from external source", you're out of compliance.

  • Audit product pages with Google's Rich Results Test
  • Verify that reviews marked in Schema.org are truly native (collected on your domain)
  • Disable plugins/widgets that automatically import third-party reviews into markup
  • Implement an internal review collection system if not already in place
  • Do not mix multiple review sources on the same product page
  • Check Search Console (Enhancements > Reviews section) to detect error pages
  • Ensure visually displayed reviews match the marked-up structured data
In summary: Google only permits markup of reviews collected directly on your site. Any import from Trustpilot, Avis Vérifiés, or other external aggregators makes your pages ineligible for rich snippets. Audit your current markup, clean up third-party imports, and implement native collection. These technical adjustments may seem straightforward on paper, but proper implementation — especially on catalogs with thousands of products — requires specialized expertise. If you lack in-house resources or your technical stack is complex, engaging an SEO-specialized agency will save you time and prevent costly visibility errors.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Puis-je afficher des avis Trustpilot sur mes pages produit sans les baliser en Schema.org ?
Oui, vous pouvez afficher visuellement des avis tiers (widget, iframe, etc.) tant que vous ne les injectez pas dans les données structurées Review ou AggregateRating. Google n'interdit pas l'affichage, il interdit le balisage.
Les avis Google Business Profile peuvent-ils être utilisés dans le balisage produit e-commerce ?
Non. Les avis GBP alimentent les extraits locaux (local pack, Maps) mais ne doivent pas être réinjectés manuellement dans les données structurées de vos pages produit. Ce sont deux contextes distincts.
Qu'est-ce qu'un "avis natif" exactement ?
Un avis collecté et publié directement sur votre site, visible sans redirection vers une plateforme tierce. Peu importe l'outil de collecte (module intégré, widget SaaS), l'essentiel est que l'avis soit hébergé sur votre domaine.
Que risque mon site si je balisé des avis agrégés externes ?
Vos pages deviennent inéligibles aux extraits enrichis d'avis (perte des étoiles dans les SERP). Dans certains cas, Google peut appliquer une action manuelle qui retire tous vos résultats enrichis, même ceux conformes.
Comment savoir si mon plugin WordPress injecte des avis tiers dans le balisage ?
Inspectez le code source de vos pages produit et cherchez les balises Schema.org de type Review ou AggregateRating. Vérifiez que les données correspondent aux avis visibles sur la page. Utilisez aussi l'outil de test des résultats enrichis de Google.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History Content E-commerce AI & SEO Local Search

🎥 From the same video 19

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 21/08/2024

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.