What does Google say about SEO? /

Official statement

Having headings in semantic order is excellent for screen readers, but from Google Search's perspective, the disorderly use of heading tags doesn't matter. The SEO Starter Guide is regularly updated to ensure its accuracy, so this information is as precise as possible.
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

💬 EN 📅 18/07/2024 ✂ 20 statements
Watch on YouTube →
Other statements from this video 19
  1. Should you panic if your hreflang disappears temporarily during a migration?
  2. Should you block GoogleOther or risk disrupting your Google services?
  3. Do local domains (ccTLD) really offer an SEO advantage for local search rankings?
  4. Does Google really treat a site after massive expansion as a brand new website?
  5. Why does Google keep displaying your old site name in search results long after a rebrand?
  6. Should you really fix every single indexation error Google reports in Search Console?
  7. How can you leverage the Google Search Status Dashboard API to supercharge your SEO tools?
  8. Why aren't your product structured data appearing in Google's rich results?
  9. Why does Google refuse to grant unlimited indexation request quotas in Search Console?
  10. Is your brand really stuck being confused with a common word? How long does Google actually need to figure it out?
  11. What's the only way to hide text from Google without using HTML tags?
  12. Is Schema Recipe really restricted to food recipes only, or can you use it creatively?
  13. Can Google actually transfer your SEO rankings during a domain migration?
  14. Does the noindex tag really only affect individual pages, or can it impact your entire site?
  15. Do you really need to fill in every single field of structured data for Google to actually use it?
  16. Does Google really use RSS feeds to discover and index new content on your site?
  17. Why is your new favicon taking so long to appear in Google search results?
  18. Do links on crawl-blocked pages really lose all their SEO value?
  19. Does Google really require a specific sitemap structure, or can you organize them however you want?
📅
Official statement from (1 year ago)
TL;DR

Google confirms that the semantic order of heading tags (H1, H2, H3...) has no impact on search rankings. You can have an H3 before an H2 without penalty. Only screen reader accessibility is affected by disordered markup.

What you need to understand

This statement from Gary Illyes helps debunk a persistent belief: the idea that you absolutely must respect a strict H1 > H2 > H3 hierarchy to please Google.

For years, SEO audits have flagged sites with H3 tags before H2, or multiple H1 tags on the same page. Google is now saying that this rigor only serves accessibility, not ranking.

Why has this misconception lasted so long?

Because accessibility recommendations and SEO best practices got mixed up. A site that's well-structured semantically is often better crawled, better understood — but not because of heading tag order, rather thanks to content clarity.

The W3C recommends a logical hierarchy for assistive technologies. SEOs extrapolated by thinking Google used this structure as a relevance signal. That's not the case.

Does Google still use Hn tags to understand content?

Yes, but differently. Google uses headings to extract information — notably to generate featured snippets or identify page sections.

But it doesn't penalize an H3 placed before an H2. The algorithm is capable of understanding the contextual hierarchy of content without relying on the strict order of HTML tags.

What's the practical takeaway from this statement?

  • The semantic order of Hn tags is not a ranking factor
  • Google still extracts information from headings, but tolerates non-compliant markup
  • A site with H3 before H2 will not be penalized by the algorithm
  • Accessibility remains a valid reason to respect the hierarchy, but it's a topic separate from SEO
  • The official SEO Starter Guide has been updated to reflect this position

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?

Yes, and that's good news. Tests I've conducted on sites with chaotic Hn structures have never shown a correlation between semantic disorder and ranking drops.

On the other hand, sites without any headings at all or with empty headings perform worse. It's not the order that matters, it's the presence of descriptive and relevant headings.

Should you abandon all hierarchy logic then?

No. Let's be honest: clean markup makes maintenance easier, improves UX, and makes content more scannable for your users.

If you're developing a new site, respect semantic hierarchy. Not for Google, but for your teams and visitors. However, if an audit reveals H3 before H2 on an existing site that performs well, don't waste time refactoring everything.

In what cases does this rule deserve to be nuanced?

Google says there's no impact, but pay attention: [To be verified] — featured snippets and people also ask sometimes rely on headings to structure answers. Coherent markup can indirectly improve your chances of being selected.

Second nuance: screen readers use Hn tags for navigation. If your audience includes people with disabilities, accessibility becomes a business criterion, not just a compliance question.

Caution: Don't confuse "no negative impact" with "useless." Logical markup remains a good practice, even if it's no longer a strict ranking criterion.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you actually do with this information?

If you're auditing a site and see poorly ordered headings, don't prioritize this task in your SEO backlog. Focus on higher-impact levers: content, internal linking, speed.

However, if you're developing a new page or redesigning a template, you might as well do things properly. One unique H1 followed by H2, then H3 — it's simple, clean, and costs nothing.

What mistakes should you avoid after this announcement?

Don't swing to the opposite extreme. Some will interpret "no impact" as "I can do whatever I want." A site without any headings or with H5 tags everywhere will still be hard for Google to understand.

Another mistake: neglecting accessibility on the grounds that "Google doesn't care." Your users do. And crawlers too, to some extent, because well-structured content is easier to parse.

How can you verify your site stays optimized despite this tolerance?

  • Check that each page has at least one descriptive and relevant H1
  • Make sure your headings contain strategic keywords, regardless of their order
  • Test your pages with a screen reader to identify major inconsistencies
  • Only correct Hn order if you're already redesigning the page structure for other reasons
  • Focus your SEO efforts on content, internal linking, and technical aspects (Core Web Vitals, indexability)

In summary: stop stressing about Hn tag order. Google is capable of understanding your content even if your markup isn't academically perfect.

That said, restructuring dozens of pages with chaotic markup can prove more complex than it appears, especially if your CMS doesn't facilitate this type of intervention. If you want to optimize your site structure while keeping an eye on priority SEO levers, calling on a specialized agency can save you valuable time and prevent costly mistakes.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Peut-on avoir plusieurs H1 sur une même page sans être pénalisé ?
Oui. Google a déjà confirmé par le passé que plusieurs H1 ne posent pas de problème. Cette déclaration va dans le même sens : l'ordre et la quantité n'ont pas d'impact direct sur le classement.
Faut-il corriger les erreurs de hiérarchie Hn détectées dans un audit SEO ?
Non, sauf si vous refondez déjà la page pour d'autres raisons ou si l'accessibilité est une priorité business. Ce n'est pas un chantier SEO prioritaire.
Google utilise-t-il encore les balises Hn pour comprendre le contenu ?
Oui, les titres servent toujours à identifier les sections et à extraire des informations pour les featured snippets. Mais l'ordre sémantique strict n'est plus exigé.
Cette tolérance s'applique-t-elle aussi aux balises H4, H5, H6 ?
La déclaration parle des « heading tags » en général, donc oui. Mais en pratique, H4 à H6 sont peu utilisés et leur impact reste marginal.
Un site sans aucun titre Hn est-il pénalisé ?
Google ne parle pas de pénalité, mais un site sans titres est plus difficile à comprendre pour l'algorithme. Les Hn restent un élément structurel utile, même si leur ordre n'importe plus.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History Content AI & SEO JavaScript & Technical SEO

🎥 From the same video 19

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 18/07/2024

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.