Official statement
If you publish something with a noindex tag, Google will ignore those pages, so there is no particular issue in using noindex in this context.
29:36
Other statements from this video 11 ▾
- 12:14 Why doesn't Google index JavaScript files like web pages?
- 12:45 Should you be worried about re-crawled indexed pages?
- 13:49 Is it true that your site's indexing isn't guaranteed by Google?
- 17:58 Why should you prioritize field data over lab data for Core Web Vitals?
- 22:42 Why are crawling and indexing considered separate processes in SEO?
- 23:46 Why does Google overlook some site content?
- 25:21 Why does SEO correction validation take so long?
- 27:30 Why do Lighthouse scores change with every SEO test?
- 31:14 Is it true that Google restricts site names by subdirectory?
- 33:48 Why does Google suggest showing only existing items?
- 34:21 Why Does Google Focus on Domain Names Instead of IP Addresses?
Official statement from
(2 years ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic
Should You Really Choose Between Noindex and Canonical for SEO Optimization?
View statement →
TL;DR
Google ignores pages with noindex. It's useful for managing indexing. No negative consequences reported if used correctly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
La balise noindex affecte-t-elle le référencement d'une page ?
Non, Google ignore simplement ces pages, elles ne sont pas indexées.
L'utilisation de noindex peut-elle améliorer mon SEO global ?
Oui, en économisant le crawl budget pour des pages plus importantes.
Est-il possible de voir quelles pages sont noindex ?
Oui, via les outils pour webmasters ou une analyse de fichiers log.
🎥 From the same video 11
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 35 min · published on 29/02/2024
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.