Official statement
From a usability and search perspective, it's clearer to list only the equipment/items that actually exist instead of displaying all items with color variations to indicate presence/absence. This makes it easier for users and Googlebot to comprehend.
33:48
Other statements from this video 11 ▾
- 12:14 Why doesn't Google index JavaScript files like web pages?
- 12:45 Should you be worried about re-crawled indexed pages?
- 13:49 Is it true that your site's indexing isn't guaranteed by Google?
- 17:58 Why should you prioritize field data over lab data for Core Web Vitals?
- 22:42 Why are crawling and indexing considered separate processes in SEO?
- 23:46 Why does Google overlook some site content?
- 25:21 Why does SEO correction validation take so long?
- 27:30 Why do Lighthouse scores change with every SEO test?
- 29:36 What happens when you use the noindex tag in your SEO strategy?
- 31:14 Is it true that Google restricts site names by subdirectory?
- 34:21 Why Does Google Focus on Domain Names Instead of IP Addresses?
Official statement from
(2 years ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic
Do webmasters really have complete control over Google search result attribution...
View statement →
TL;DR
Google prefers that websites list only existing items to simplify understanding for both users and Googlebot. This clarifies indexing and enhances user experience.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Comment cette stratégie affecte-t-elle le SEO ?
Elle favorise une indexation plus précise et un crawl plus efficace en réduisant les éléments inutiles.
Est-ce applicable à tous les types de sites ?
Pas toujours. Certains sites comme ceux du e-commerce peuvent bénéficier de l'affichage d'éléments temporairement absents.
Dois-je modifier mes métadonnées en conséquence ?
Concentrez-vous sur les métadonnées de vos éléments existants pour assurer leur pertinence et précision.
🎥 From the same video 11
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 35 min · published on 29/02/2024
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.