What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 3 questions

Less than 30 seconds. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~30s 🎯 3 questions 📚 SEO Google

Official statement

Calculating internal PageRank can be technically interesting but isn't super critical from a practical standpoint. Google uses PageRank but also many other factors, so this calculation doesn't exactly reflect how Google actually works.
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

💬 EN 📅 21/01/2022 ✂ 21 statements
Watch on YouTube →
Other statements from this video 20
  1. Les liens internes dans le header ou le footer ont-ils moins de valeur SEO ?
  2. Google pénalise-t-il vraiment un site qui achète des liens en masse ?
  3. Faut-il vraiment viser la perfection technique pour bien ranker sur Google ?
  4. Pourquoi Google crawle-t-il moins votre site s'il le trouve de mauvaise qualité ?
  5. Le statut « Crawlée, actuellement non indexée » est-il vraiment un signal de qualité insuffisante ?
  6. Les données structurées invalides peuvent-elles pénaliser votre référencement ?
  7. Faut-il s'inquiéter d'une baisse du nombre de pages indexées ?
  8. Crawlée non indexée vs Découverte non indexée : vraiment équivalent ?
  9. Peut-on vraiment contrôler les images affichées dans les snippets Google ?
  10. Pourquoi Google pénalise-t-il le contenu dupliqué entre sites de franchises ?
  11. CCTLD, sous-domaine ou sous-répertoire : quelle structure pour le géociblage international ?
  12. Le code 503 protège-t-il vraiment vos pages de la désindexation en cas de panne ?
  13. Les liens dofollow accidentels dans vos RP vont-ils vous pénaliser ?
  14. Peut-on vraiment utiliser l'outil de changement d'adresse pour fusionner ou diviser des sites ?
  15. Pourquoi vos données structurées disparaissent-elles sur vos pages localisées ?
  16. Les données structurées améliorent-elles vraiment le référencement ou juste l'affichage ?
  17. Google va-t-il un jour afficher les Core Web Vitals directement dans les résultats de recherche ?
  18. Restructuration d'URL : pourquoi Google provoque-t-il des fluctuations pendant deux mois ?
  19. Le linking interne surpasse-t-il vraiment la structure d'URL pour le SEO ?
  20. Google peut-il vraiment identifier la langue principale d'une page multilingue sans pénaliser votre SEO ?
📅
Official statement from (4 years ago)
TL;DR

Google confirms that internal PageRank remains a signal used but its practical impact is limited. Tools that calculate internal PR don't reflect how the algorithm actually works, which combines hundreds of other factors. Bottom line: it's useful for understanding your site's internal linking structure, but not a decisive indicator for prioritizing your efforts.

What you need to understand

What exactly does "internal PageRank" mean?

The internal PageRank refers to the score calculated from a site's internal links, excluding external backlinks. The idea: identify which pages receive the most "link juice" through your internal linking structure.

Many SEO tools (Screaming Frog, OnCrawl, Botify) offer this calculation to help detect orphaned pages, poorly linked pages, or conversely, over-optimized ones. It's a metric for structural diagnosis — nothing more.

Why does Mueller say it's "not super critical"?

Because Google doesn't base its determination of page importance solely on PageRank. The search engine cross-references hundreds of signals: semantic relevance, search intent, freshness, user engagement, backlinks, content quality, and so on.

Internal PR gives a mechanical view of your internal linking, but completely ignores the semantic and contextual dimension that Google values today. A page with low internal PR can rank very well if it perfectly answers a specific query.

Does Google still use PageRank in 2025?

Yes. Mueller confirms that PageRank is still part of the algorithm. But it's one signal among many, and probably less decisive than before in the overall weighting.

The historical PR (from the toolbar, gone for years) was public and simplistic. The PR Google uses today is a much more sophisticated version, incorporating context and nuance — impossible to faithfully reproduce with a simple crawl.

  • Internal PageRank remains a diagnostic tool useful for spotting structural problems.
  • It does not reflect how Google actually evaluates a page's importance.
  • Google combines PR with hundreds of other factors — PR alone isn't decisive.
  • SEO tools calculate an approximation, not Google's actual PR.

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?

Absolutely. In the field, we regularly see pages with mediocre internal PR performing very well in the SERPs if they target specific queries with quality content. Conversely, some hyper-linked pages stagnate because they add no value to users.

Internal linking remains crucial — let's be clear about that. But the strategic intent behind your linking matters more than its raw volume. Three contextual links from semantically close pages beat an avalanche of footer or sidebar links any day.

What nuances should we add to this statement?

Mueller says "not super critical," but that doesn't mean "useless." Internal PR remains relevant for identifying structural imbalances: orphaned pages, excessive depth, poorly planned silos.

Let's be honest: Google rarely communicates about the relative importance of signals. Saying "we also consider many other factors" is a classic dodge to avoid revealing the actual weighting. [To verify]: it's impossible to know how much weight PR still carries in the overall algorithm.

Warning: don't throw your internal linking audit in the trash. Internal PR remains a good proxy for spotting inconsistencies. Just don't expect improving this score alone to skyrocket your rankings.

In what cases does internal PR remain truly useful?

For large sites with thousands of pages (e-commerce, media, directories), internal PR helps prioritize crawling and identify neglected pages. It's a quick filter for detecting where to concentrate your linking efforts.

For sites with 50-100 pages, frankly, a manual audit of the structure is plenty. Calculating internal PR becomes technical fetishism without real added value.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you do concretely with this information?

Stop chasing a perfect internal PR score. Use it as a structural health indicator, not an SEO performance metric. Your goal: ensure every important page is accessible, logically linked, and contextually relevant.

Focus instead on the semantic relevance of your linking. A link from a thematically close page is worth more than ten links from off-topic pages. Anchor context matters tremendously.

What mistakes should you avoid after this statement?

Don't completely neglect internal linking on the grounds that "Google says it's not critical." That would be naive. Internal linking remains a major lever for crawl distribution and semantic consistency.

Also avoid over-investing in complex internal PR calculation tools if you don't have the SEO maturity to exploit that data. Before modeling PageRank flows, make sure you already have logical architecture and clean silos.

How do you verify that your linking strategy is solid?

  • Audit click depth: all your strategic pages should be accessible in 3 clicks max from the homepage.
  • Verify there are no orphaned pages (pages with no internal backlinks).
  • Analyze anchor context: are they natural, descriptive, varied?
  • Identify high-potential business pages that receive too few internal links.
  • Cross-reference internal PR with crawl and indexation data in Search Console.
  • Test the impact of linking adjustments on a sample of pages before rolling out changes widely.
Internal PageRank remains a good diagnostic tool for spotting structural weaknesses, but it shouldn't become an obsession. Favor a holistic approach combining logical linking, semantic relevance, and alignment with business objectives. If managing these structural and semantic trade-offs seems complex — and it often is on high-volume sites — support from a specialized SEO agency can help you prioritize truly impactful levers without wasting time on secondary optimizations.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Google utilise-t-il encore le PageRank en interne ?
Oui, Google confirme utiliser une version du PageRank dans son algorithme, mais c'est un signal parmi des centaines d'autres. Le PR classique tel qu'on le connaissait a largement évolué et n'est plus un facteur dominant.
Est-ce que calculer le PageRank interne sert encore à quelque chose ?
Oui, pour diagnostiquer les problèmes de structure : pages orphelines, profondeur excessive, déséquilibres de maillage. Mais ne vous attendez pas à ce que ce score reflète fidèlement le fonctionnement de Google.
Faut-il arrêter d'optimiser le maillage interne ?
Absolument pas. Le maillage interne reste crucial pour la distribution du crawl, la cohérence sémantique et l'UX. Simplement, ne le pilotez pas uniquement sur un score de PR interne.
Quels outils permettent de calculer le PageRank interne ?
Screaming Frog, OnCrawl, Botify, Sitebulb proposent des métriques de PR interne. Gardez à l'esprit qu'il s'agit d'approximations basées sur votre structure de liens, pas du vrai calcul de Google.
Le PageRank interne peut-il prédire les performances SEO d'une page ?
Non. Une page peut avoir un faible PR interne et très bien ranker si elle répond parfaitement à une requête. Le PR interne est un indicateur structurel, pas un prédicteur de positionnement.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History Content AI & SEO JavaScript & Technical SEO Links & Backlinks

🎥 From the same video 20

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 21/01/2022

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.