What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 3 questions

Less than 30 seconds. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~30s 🎯 3 questions 📚 SEO Google

Official statement

Although it is recommended to have a fast site and operate in HTTPS, these elements are not absolute requirements to appear in Google search results. They are part of important best practices but their absence does not prevent indexation.
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

💬 EN 📅 22/12/2022 ✂ 9 statements
Watch on YouTube →
Other statements from this video 8
  1. Pourquoi la limite de 15 Mo de Googlebot n'est-elle documentée que maintenant ?
  2. Quelles sont les 3 seules exigences techniques absolues pour être indexé par Google ?
  3. Faut-il vraiment ignorer ce que Google ne supporte pas ?
  4. Pourquoi Google a-t-il divisé ses guidelines en règles strictes et simples recommandations ?
  5. Comment prioriser vos actions SEO selon le système de classification de Google ?
  6. L'accessibilité Googlebot est-elle vraiment une condition binaire pour l'indexation ?
  7. Google distingue-t-il vraiment les « exigences absolues » des « bonnes pratiques » en SEO ?
  8. Google distingue-t-il vraiment les changements de documentation des changements d'algorithme ?
📅
Official statement from (3 years ago)
TL;DR

Google confirms that HTTPS and speed are not prerequisites for indexation. A slow HTTP site can therefore appear in search results. But beware: these factors still influence ranking, even if their absence doesn't eliminate a site from the index.

What you need to understand

Does Google really distinguish between indexation and ranking?

Absolutely. And it's crucial not to confuse the two. Indexation simply refers to the presence of a page in Google's index — in other words, the possibility that it appears somewhere in the results. Ranking, on the other hand, determines at what position.

Gary Illyes makes it clear: neither HTTPS nor speed block access to the index. A site can therefore be indexed even if it's slow as a snail and still runs on HTTP. But that says nothing about its ability to position itself correctly against better-optimized competitors.

Why does Google insist on this distinction?

Because many site owners panic thinking that a poor PageSpeed score or lack of SSL certificate will make them disappear from the index. That's not the case. Google wants to reassure: indexation remains accessible, even with technical shortcomings.

Now, does that mean we can ignore these criteria? No. This statement doesn't say that HTTPS and speed have no impact — just that they're not barriers to entry. A fundamental nuance.

What are the key takeaways from this statement?

  • Indexation ≠ ranking — a slow HTTP site can be indexed but poorly positioned
  • HTTPS and speed remain confirmed ranking factors for years
  • Google does not set a minimum technical threshold to enter the index
  • Best practices remain recommended for competitiveness and user experience
  • This statement aims to downplay technical constraints, not minimize them

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?

Yes and no. On paper, it's true: we still find HTTP sites in results, and some slow sites are indexed. So technically, Gary Illyes isn't lying. But let's look at reality.

In most competitive sectors, an HTTP site or one with catastrophic Core Web Vitals never makes the first page. So yes, it can be indexed — but practically speaking, what value does that have if no one sees it? We're talking about an academic distinction that has little strategic interest for a real business.

What nuances should be added to this official discourse?

Google plays with words. Saying that HTTPS and speed are not absolute requirements says nothing about their real weight. We've known since 2014 that HTTPS is a ranking signal. We've known since 2021 that Core Web Vitals influence ranking via Page Experience.

What's missing here — and this is intentional — is an indication of the extent of this impact. [To verify]: Google gives no figures on the weighting of these criteria. Does it count for 1% or 15% of the score? Impossible to say with this vague statement.

Warning: Don't take this statement as a green light to neglect HTTPS or speed. In competitive SERPs, these factors can shift a result from page 1 to page 3 — and there, you might as well not exist.

In what cases can you afford to downplay these criteria?

Let's be honest: if you're in an ultra-specific niche market with little competition and a captive audience, you can probably survive without HTTPS or heavy speed optimization. But that's the exception.

For 95% of sites, especially in e-commerce, media, or B2B services, ignoring these criteria amounts to shooting yourself in the foot. Algorithms favor user experience — and HTTPS + speed are direct markers of it. So yes, technically optional. Strategically? Essential.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you concretely do with this information?

First, don't panic if your HTTPS migration or speed optimizations take time. Your site won't disappear from the index overnight. But don't rest on your laurels either.

Next, prioritize intelligently. If you have to choose between fixing a structural indexation problem (poorly configured robots.txt, messy canonicals) and improving your PageSpeed score, start with the first. But keep HTTPS and speed on your short-term roadmap.

What mistakes should you avoid following this statement?

The classic mistake would be to conclude: "Google says it's not required, so I won't do it." That's loser's thinking. Just because a criterion isn't blocking doesn't mean it's negligible.

Another trap: believing that good content alone compensates for poor user experience. Yes, content is still king — but a king on a wobbly throne doesn't rule for long. HTTPS reassures users, speed reduces bounce rate. These elements have an indirect effect on the behavioral signals Google observes.

How can you verify your site meets current standards?

  • Verify that your site runs entirely on HTTPS (no mixed HTTP/HTTPS content)
  • Test your Core Web Vitals via PageSpeed Insights and Search Console
  • Analyze priority pages: homepage, category pages, product sheets / flagship articles
  • Identify third-party scripts that slow down load time (ads, tracking, widgets)
  • Fix render-blocking issues (unoptimized CSS, JavaScript)
  • Set up regular speed monitoring (don't rely on a one-time test)
  • Prioritize high-impact actions: image compression, lazy loading, browser cache
In summary: HTTPS and speed are not insurmountable barriers to indexation, but they are essential competitiveness levers. Treating this statement as permission to do nothing would be a major strategic mistake. If technical optimization seems complex or time-consuming to you — and it often is — calling on a specialized SEO agency can save you valuable time and prevent costly errors on these critical aspects.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Un site en HTTP peut-il vraiment ranker en première page sur Google ?
Techniquement oui, mais c'est de plus en plus rare dans les SERP concurrentielles. HTTPS reste un signal de classement depuis 2014 et influence également la confiance des utilisateurs, ce qui impacte indirectement les métriques comportementales.
Les Core Web Vitals sont-ils vraiment importants si Google dit que la vitesse n'est pas une exigence absolue ?
Absolument. Google fait une distinction entre indexation et classement. Les Core Web Vitals influencent le ranking via le signal Page Experience, même s'ils ne bloquent pas l'accès à l'index.
Dois-je prioritiser HTTPS ou la vitesse si je dois choisir ?
HTTPS d'abord, pour des raisons de sécurité et de confiance utilisateur. C'est aussi plus simple à implémenter. Mais la vitesse doit suivre rapidement, surtout si vous êtes en e-commerce ou sur mobile.
Cette déclaration change-t-elle quelque chose aux recommandations SEO habituelles ?
Non. Elle clarifie simplement qu'il n'y a pas de seuil technique minimum pour être indexé. Mais les best practices restent inchangées : HTTPS et vitesse demeurent des critères de classement importants.
Google donne-t-il des seuils précis de vitesse à respecter ?
Non, et c'est volontaire. Google parle de Core Web Vitals avec des seuils indicatifs (bon/à améliorer/mauvais), mais ne révèle pas le poids exact de ces critères dans l'algorithme de classement.
🏷 Related Topics
Crawl & Indexing HTTPS & Security AI & SEO JavaScript & Technical SEO Web Performance

🎥 From the same video 8

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 22/12/2022

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.