Official statement
For LCP, values under 2.5 seconds are considered good. Pages taking more than 4 seconds are considered poor and provide a bad user experience.
Other statements from this video 13 ▾
- □ How Does User Experience Really Influence Your SEO?
- □ How does mobile-friendliness affect your SEO right now?
- □ Should you really switch to HTTPS to boost your SEO rankings?
- □ How can you effectively enhance page experience with Google's guidelines?
- □ Are Google's Core Web Vitals now crucial for SEO rankings?
- □ Is it true that 100 milliseconds is crucial for FID?
- □ How can mastering the CLS score boost your SEO?
- □ Should you rethink your interstitials to please Google?
- □ Why can all qualified web pages now access Top Stories?
- □ How is page experience now affecting desktop SEO?
- □ How does preloading with signed exchanges enhance your SEO strategy?
- □ How can the new page experience report revolutionize your SEO?
- □ Why does filtering for good page experiences in SEO make a difference?
Official statement from
(5 years ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic
Is your LCP really the one you think you're optimizing?
View statement →
TL;DR
For Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), Google considers a good performance to be under 2.5 seconds. Anything over 4 seconds is deemed poor. The impact is direct: loading time affects user experience.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Qu'est-ce que le LCP ?
Le Largest Contentful Paint mesure le temps de chargement du plus grand élément visible d'une page web.
Pourquoi le LCP impacte-t-il le classement SEO ?
Un LCP rapide améliore l'expérience utilisateur, un facteur que Google valorise pour le classement.
Comment puis-je améliorer mon LCP ?
Optimisez les ressources critiques, compressez les images et réduisez le JavaScript bloquant.
🎥 From the same video 13
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 18/05/2021
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.