Official statement
If redirect pages (like external login pages) are indexed, there is usually no particular problem. There's no need to worry excessively. The URL removal tool is not recommended in this scenario.
9:48
Other statements from this video 11 ▾
- 1:33 How will Google's 'Helpful Content' update shake up SEO?
- 3:39 How can you create truly unique and impactful content for SEO?
- 3:39 Should you really focus solely on creating valuable content for users?
- 4:43 Should you keep using the hreflang tag after the Search Console update?
- 11:21 Is it true that Google overlooks your redirects for the canonical version?
- 14:41 Why is mastering the FAQ format in SEO essential?
- 15:44 Is adding a job application button really not considered SEO cloaking?
- 17:53 Are Pros and Cons structured data really unsuitable for product pages?
- 19:40 How can you effectively manage robots.txt and noindex for Google?
- 21:30 Why is the noarchive meta tag essential for SEO?
- 25:30 Is your page suddenly losing its SEO ranking?
Official statement from
(4 years ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic
Should you really redirect all non-canonical URLs with 301s for SEO?
View statement →
TL;DR
Google states that indexing redirect pages is generally not an issue. The URL removal tool is not necessary in this case.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Les pages de connexion redirigées doivent-elles être indexées ?
Pas nécessairement, elles devraient idéalement être gérées pour une meilleure expérience utilisateur.
L'indexation des redirections impacte-t-elle le classement SEO ?
Selon Google, aucune incidence majeure sur le SEO n'est attendue.
Quand utiliser l'outil de suppression d'URL ?
Utilisez-le pour du contenu nécessitant une suppression rapide, pas pour des redirections banales.
🎥 From the same video 11
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 30 min · published on 01/09/2022
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.