Official statement
Pages with different parameters creating duplicates should not be considered low-quality content. This is a duplication issue to be solved through canonicalization, not a content quality problem.
11:33
Other statements from this video 13 ▾
- 1:05 Should you prepare for the Helpful Content Update in Japanese to enhance your SEO?
- 4:42 Is it true that structured markup for conditional free shipping is missing in SEO?
- 6:48 Why is canonicalization essential for SEO with duplicate content?
- 9:24 What happens when you have a noindex on mobile with mobile-first indexing?
- 9:29 Is it true that sitemaps play a crucial role in indexing?
- 13:07 Should you really wait until a domain migration is complete before making any moves?
- 13:39 Should you be worried about SEO drops after the end of AMP pages?
- 15:41 Why do some video pages escape indexing?
- 18:19 How does reverse cloaking complicate canonicalization?
- 20:39 How do real user data impact your SEO performance?
- 23:05 What’s the best way to fix an erroneous snippet on Google?
- 23:57 Do advertisers really have an SEO advantage with Google?
- 30:52 Why are crawling and indexing considered separate in SEO?
Official statement from
(3 years ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic
How Can XML Sitemaps Help You Manage Internal Duplicate Content?
View statement →
TL;DR
Google states that duplicate pages through different parameters are not low-quality, but a problem to manage through canonicalization. Don't confuse duplication with content quality.
🎥 From the same video 13
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 32 min · published on 29/09/2022
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.