What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 3 questions

Less than 30 seconds. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~30s 🎯 3 questions 📚 SEO Google

Official statement

Google Search does not use the content of the meta keywords tag for search engine optimization. This position has been consistent since at least 2009 and remains unchanged today.
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

💬 EN 📅 15/03/2022 ✂ 5 statements
Watch on YouTube →
Other statements from this video 4
  1. La balise meta keywords nuit-elle vraiment au référencement Google ?
  2. Quelles balises meta ont vraiment un impact sur le référencement Google ?
  3. Quelles balises meta Google utilise-t-il vraiment pour le référencement ?
  4. Faut-il vraiment supprimer la balise meta keywords de tous vos sites ?
📅
Official statement from (4 years ago)
TL;DR

Google Search has completely ignored the meta keywords tag since at least 2009. This position has never changed and remains valid today. In concrete terms, filling in this tag brings absolutely no SEO benefit for Google — it's wasted time.

What you need to understand

Why did Google abandon the meta keywords tag?

The meta keywords tag was created in the 1990s to help search engines understand the content of a page. Except it quickly became a playground for spammers who stuffed hundreds of keywords unrelated to the actual content.

Google officially abandoned this tag in 2009, arguing that its content was unreliable and too easily manipulated. Since then, this position has never evolved — and John Mueller regularly reaffirms it to put misconceptions to rest.

Do other search engines still use this tag?

That's where it gets complicated. Google is not the only search engine in the world. Some search engines — notably Bing and Yandex — have in the past claimed they could use the meta keywords tag, but with virtually no weight.

In practice, no major search engine clearly communicates its current use of this tag. The industry consensus: even if it were read elsewhere, its impact would be insignificant.

What are the risks of filling in this tag anyway?

The direct risk is low. Filling in the meta keywords tag will not penalize your site — Google ignores it, plain and simple. However, exposing your strategic keywords in the source code can give valuable clues to your competitors.

Some paranoid SEO professionals therefore avoid filling it in to keep their strategy hidden. Others leave it empty or have removed it entirely from their templates.

  • Google completely ignores the content of the meta keywords tag since 2009
  • No major search engine gives it significant importance today
  • Filling in this tag = waste of time and risk of exposing your strategy to competitors
  • Removing it or leaving it empty has no negative impact on your search engine rankings

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with what we observe in practice?

Absolutely. SEO tests conducted for years show that adding, modifying, or removing the meta keywords tag results in no change in rankings on Google. Even if you stuff it with hundreds of terms, no measurable impact.

SEO audit tools sometimes continue to flag the absence of this tag as a "warning" — it's just a remnant of poorly configured parameters. A good modern SEO crawl shouldn't even mention it anymore.

Are there cases where this tag can still be useful?

Let's be honest: very few. If you're targeting local or alternative search engines (like Baidu, Naver, or certain regional engines), there might be a micro-utility. But even there, data is scarce — [To verify].

Some internal search systems (site-specific search engines, closed CMS) may still read this tag. But it's such a marginal use case that it doesn't justify including it by default on all your pages.

Why do some SEO professionals continue to fill it in?

Out of habit, mainly. Or because their CMS adds it automatically and they don't question it. Some clients also require seeing it filled, believing that "it looks professional" — pure SEO cargo cult.

The problem is that maintaining this tag takes time. Time that could be invested in optimizations that actually have an impact: title tags, meta descriptions, content, internal linking.

Warning: If you decide to remove this tag en masse on an existing site, do it properly. A poorly written script that leaves empty tags (<meta name="keywords" content="">) can sometimes cause small display bugs depending on your CMS. Test first on a few pages.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you concretely do with the meta keywords tag?

The recommendation is simple: don't waste time on this tag. If it's already on your site, you can leave it (as long as it doesn't reveal strategic keywords), or remove it to clean up your source code.

If you're launching a new project, simply don't include it in your templates. That's less code to maintain, and no SEO benefit to expect.

What mistakes should you avoid regarding this tag?

The classic mistake: spending time optimizing it when that time could be invested elsewhere. Some webmasters spend hours refining their keyword lists in this tag — pure waste of resources.

Another trap: believing it can "compensate" for weak title tags or H1s. It compensates for nothing at all since it's not read.

How can you verify your site doesn't depend on it?

Do a quick crawl with Screaming Frog, Oncrawl, or your favorite tool. Filter for the presence of the meta keywords tag. If it appears on all your pages with generic or duplicate content, that's a sign of a misconfigured template.

Also check if your CMS or SEO plugin (Yoast, RankMath, etc.) automatically fills this tag. If so, disable the option — these tools often propose it by default for historical reasons.

  • Don't include the meta keywords tag in new projects
  • Remove or leave empty this tag on existing sites (no negative impact)
  • Never spend time optimizing it — invest instead in title, H1, content
  • Check that your CMS or SEO plugin doesn't fill it automatically
  • Crawl your site to identify any meta keywords tags present
  • If you remove it on a large scale, test first on a sample of pages
The meta keywords tag is a relic of the past in SEO that no longer has any utility for Google Search. Removing it or not using it will have no negative impact — quite the opposite, it lightens your code and saves you time. Focus your efforts on elements that actually matter: quality content, solid technical structure, user experience. These optimizations, while more complex to manage, are the ones that will really make a difference in your SEO performance. If managing these technical and strategic aspects seems difficult to handle alone, support from a specialized SEO agency can help you prioritize the right projects and maximize your return on investment.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

La balise meta keywords peut-elle pénaliser mon site si je la remplis ?
Non, Google l'ignore totalement — elle ne peut donc ni vous aider ni vous pénaliser. Le seul risque est d'exposer vos mots-clés stratégiques à vos concurrents.
Dois-je supprimer la balise meta keywords de toutes mes pages existantes ?
Ce n'est pas obligatoire, mais c'est recommandé pour nettoyer le code source et éviter de donner des indices sur votre stratégie. Si vous la supprimez, faites-le proprement pour éviter des balises vides orphelines.
Yoast SEO ou RankMath remplissent automatiquement cette balise — dois-je désactiver cette option ?
Oui, désactivez cette fonctionnalité si elle est proposée. Ces plugins la maintiennent par défaut pour des raisons historiques, mais elle n'a aucune utilité SEO aujourd'hui.
D'autres moteurs de recherche comme Bing utilisent-ils encore la balise meta keywords ?
Bing a déclaré par le passé qu'il pouvait la lire, mais avec un poids quasi nul. En pratique, aucun moteur majeur ne communique clairement sur son utilisation actuelle — le consensus est qu'elle n'a plus d'impact significatif nulle part.
La balise meta keywords peut-elle aider mon moteur de recherche interne ?
Uniquement si votre moteur interne est configuré pour la lire, ce qui est rare. Dans ce cas très spécifique, elle peut avoir une micro-utilité — mais ce n'est pas un cas d'usage SEO classique.
🏷 Related Topics
Content

🎥 From the same video 4

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 15/03/2022

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.