What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 3 questions

Less than 30 seconds. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~30s 🎯 3 questions 📚 SEO Google

Official statement

Googlebot pays no attention whatsoever to the content of the meta keywords tag, regardless of what values it contains. This tag is completely ignored by Google's indexing process.
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

💬 EN 📅 15/03/2022 ✂ 5 statements
Watch on YouTube →
Other statements from this video 4
  1. Faut-il supprimer la balise meta keywords de vos pages ?
  2. La balise meta keywords nuit-elle vraiment au référencement Google ?
  3. Quelles balises meta ont vraiment un impact sur le référencement Google ?
  4. Quelles balises meta Google utilise-t-il vraiment pour le référencement ?
📅
Official statement from (4 years ago)
TL;DR

Google completely ignores the meta keywords tag — it has no impact on indexing or ranking. Googlebot doesn't even read its content. Keeping or removing this tag is now purely a technical choice with no direct SEO consequences.

What you need to understand

John Mueller confirms what many have suspected for years: the meta keywords tag is completely ignored by Googlebot. Not partially, not "sometimes" — completely.

This clarification puts an end to a recurring debate: some were still adding keywords to it "just in case," thinking that a weak signal was better than nothing.

Why did Google abandon this tag?

In the 1990s, the meta keywords tag was used to indicate a page's subject. But it was quickly massively spammed: webmasters would stuff hundreds of keywords into it with no relation to the actual page content.

Google therefore stopped using it as a relevance signal from the early 2000s onwards. Since then, the algorithm relies exclusively on analyzing visible content, titles, link anchors, and semantic context.

Is this tag dangerous for SEO?

No. It's simply useless. Googlebot completely skips over it during crawling — it weighs neither positively nor negatively in rankings.

The only risk concerns other search engines: Bing and Yandex have indicated in the past that abusive use could be interpreted as spam. But even there, the impact remains marginal.

  • Google completely ignores the content of meta keywords
  • This tag has no impact on indexing or ranking
  • Keeping it doesn't hurt, but it serves absolutely no purpose
  • Bing and Yandex could theoretically penalize abuse, but this is rare
  • Time spent filling this tag is wasted time

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with what we observe in the field?

Yes, completely. For at least 15 years, no correlation has ever been measured between the presence of this tag and organic performance on Google. A/B tests consistently show zero variation in traffic or rankings.

Some SEO tools continue to audit it by default, which maintains the confusion. But concretely, if you remove meta keywords tomorrow morning from 10,000 pages, you won't see any change in Search Console.

Why do some CMS platforms still include it by default?

Technical legacy. Many WordPress, Drupal, or Magento themes generated this tag 10 years ago and nobody bothered to clean up the code.

Some SEO plugins still offer it "for Bing" — a questionable argument, given that Bing itself declared in 2014 that it didn't use it as a relevance signal.

In what cases could this tag still be useful?

Practically none. A few internal company search engines or legacy document indexing tools might still use it — but that's marginal.

If your site feeds into a third-party system that consumes this metadata, keep it for integration reasons. Otherwise, it only inflates the HTML unnecessarily.

Caution: Don't confuse meta keywords with meta description — the latter remains essential for CTR, even though it doesn't directly impact rankings.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you do concretely with this tag?

Three options are available to you. Remove it: this is the cleanest solution if you control the source code or CMS. It streamlines the HTML and prevents any future confusion.

Leave it in place: if it's generated automatically and modifying it requires disproportionate effort, it makes no difference. Google ignores it anyway.

Stop filling it manually: if your SEO workflow still includes this step, eliminate it immediately. This time should be reallocated to optimizations that actually matter.

What mistakes should you avoid following this clarification?

Don't fall into the opposite extreme: some SEO professionals tend to overreact to Google's statements and launch massive cleanup initiatives. If meta keywords is present on 50,000 pages and removing it requires a dev sprint, it's clearly not a priority.

Another trap: confusing meta keywords with other actually useful meta tags (description, robots, canonical). Make sure your technical team doesn't delete everything in one go.

How should you prioritize this project against other SEO optimizations?

Place it in low priority. If you have crawl budget issues, broken internal linking, duplicate content, or Core Web Vitals problems, fix those first.

Removing meta keywords is technical housekeeping — useful during a redesign or migration, but not urgent if the rest of your site is performing well.

  • Audit your CMS to see if meta keywords is generated automatically
  • Immediately stop any manual workflow for filling this tag
  • Plan its removal during the next redesign or major technical update
  • Reallocate the time saved to optimizing meta description or title tags
  • Verify that your team clearly distinguishes meta keywords from other essential meta tags
  • Don't launch a dev sprint dedicated solely to its removal if other critical SEO projects are waiting
The meta keywords tag deserves neither panic nor urgency. Remove it when the opportunity arises, but concentrate your resources on levers that actually impact your rankings. If managing these technical trade-offs seems complex to you or if you lack bandwidth to prioritize your SEO projects effectively, guidance from a specialized agency can help you structure a coherent roadmap and avoid false priorities.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Est-ce que supprimer la balise meta keywords va améliorer mon SEO ?
Non. Google l'ignore déjà, donc la supprimer ne change strictement rien à vos positions. Cela peut juste alléger légèrement le code HTML.
Bing utilise-t-il encore la balise meta keywords ?
Bing a déclaré en 2014 qu'il ne l'utilisait plus comme signal de pertinence. Il peut théoriquement pénaliser un abus manifeste, mais c'est rare et marginal.
Les CMS comme WordPress génèrent-ils encore cette balise par défaut ?
Certains thèmes et plugins SEO anciens le font encore, par héritage technique. Les versions récentes ont tendance à ne plus la proposer.
Si je la garde, est-ce que ça peut nuire à mon référencement ?
Non. Google l'ignore totalement — elle ne pèse ni positivement ni négativement. Elle prend juste de la place inutilement dans le HTML.
Dois-je prioriser la suppression de meta keywords sur mes autres chantiers SEO ?
Non. C'est une optimisation cosmétique de faible priorité. Concentrez-vous d'abord sur le contenu, le maillage interne, les Core Web Vitals et le crawl budget.
🏷 Related Topics
Content Crawl & Indexing

🎥 From the same video 4

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 15/03/2022

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.