Official statement
Some websites try to make dynamic pages appear as static pages by adding an HTML extension, but this does nothing to alter Google's processing. There's no need to do this.
Other statements from this video 6 ▾
- □ Is there really no limit to the number of HTML pages Google can index?
- □ Does Google really treat static and dynamic pages the same way?
- □ How does Google wisely allocate its indexing resources?
- □ Why doesn't Google index all new websites right away?
- □ Does perceived quality really drive extensive indexing on Google?
- □ How can you ensure your website gets indexed by Google more effectively?
Official statement from
(5 years ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic
Does hiding mobile content with CSS really sabotage your Mobile-First indexing?
View statement →
TL;DR
Adding an HTML extension to dynamic pages doesn't enhance their processing by Google. Focus on other more impactful SEO aspects.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Est-ce que l'ajout d'une extension HTML améliore le SEO ?
Non, selon Google, cela n'a pas d'impact sur le traitement de la page pour le référencement.
Les pages dynamiques sont-elles pénalisées par Google ?
Pas du tout. Google évalue les pages dynamiques selon les mêmes critères que les pages statiques.
Y a-t-il un avantage à garder une extension .html ?
Peu d'avantages SEO actuels, mais cela peut aider à structurer vos URLs pour les utilisateurs.
🎥 From the same video 6
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 07/06/2021
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.