What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

Google has announced new ranking signals (Web Vitals) but they will not be launched until the end of 2020. Webmasters can prioritize other urgent tasks such as adapting to the health situation.
3:50
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 1h14 💬 EN 📅 04/06/2020 ✂ 44 statements
Watch on YouTube (3:50) →
Other statements from this video 43
  1. 2:22 What should you do if your site lost traffic after a Core Update without making any mistakes?
  2. 2:22 Are Core Web Vitals Really Going to Transform Your SEO Strategy?
  3. 3:50 Does a ranking drop after a Core Update really indicate an issue with your site?
  4. 3:50 Why is Google delaying the complete transition to the Mobile-First Index?
  5. 7:07 Can Google really delay Mobile-First Indexing indefinitely?
  6. 11:00 Why doesn't Google canonicalize URLs with fragments in sitelinks and rich results?
  7. 11:00 Do URLs with fragments (#) in Search Console mean you need to rethink your tracking and analysis strategy?
  8. 14:34 Why do the numbers from Analytics, Search Console, and My Business never match?
  9. 14:35 Why do your Google metrics never align between Search Console, Analytics, and Business Profile?
  10. 16:37 How are FAQ clicks really counted in Search Console?
  11. 18:44 Are mobile and desktop accordions really neutral for SEO?
  12. 18:44 Is it true that mobile accordion hidden content is indexed as visible content?
  13. 29:45 Does the rel=canonical via HTTP header really still work?
  14. 30:09 Does the HTTP header rel=canonical really work to manage duplicate content?
  15. 31:00 Why does Search Console still show 'PC Googlebot' on recent sites when Mobile-First Index is supposed to be the standard?
  16. 31:02 Is it true that all sites indexed after July 2019 default to Mobile-First Indexing?
  17. 33:28 Why does Google emphasize textual context in Search Console feedback?
  18. 33:31 Are Search Console tools really enough to solve your indexing problems?
  19. 33:59 Why are your pages still not indexed after 60 days in Search Console?
  20. 37:24 What happens when Google occasionally indexes HTTP instead of HTTPS even after an SSL migration?
  21. 37:53 Is it really necessary to combine both 301 redirections AND canonical tags for an HTTPS migration?
  22. 39:16 What really causes your sitemap to fail in Search Console and how can you effectively resolve the issue?
  23. 41:29 Is your brand disappearing from the SERPs for no apparent reason: can Google feedback really fix it?
  24. 44:07 Should you choose a subdomain or a new domain for launching a service?
  25. 44:34 Subdomain or New Domain: What Does Google Really Think for SEO?
  26. 44:34 Do Google penalties really transfer between domains and subdomains?
  27. 45:27 Do Google penalties really spread between domains and subdomains?
  28. 48:24 Should you really overlook PageRank when deciding between a domain and a subdomain?
  29. 48:33 Do links between root domains and subdomains really pass PageRank?
  30. 49:58 Should you really be worried about duplicate content from scraping?
  31. 50:14 Can you relaunch an old domain without being penalized for duplicate content by spammers?
  32. 50:14 Should you really report every scraping URL via the Spam Report to prompt action from Google?
  33. 57:15 Is it really necessary to report spam URL by URL to assist Google?
  34. 58:57 Why does Google refuse to show your FAQs in rich results despite perfect markup?
  35. 59:54 Why doesn't Google display your FAQ rich results even with perfect markup?
  36. 65:15 Is it possible to add FAQs to your pages just to secure rich results in SEO?
  37. 65:45 Can you really add a FAQ just to get the rich result without risking penalties?
  38. 67:27 Should you still optimize rel=next/prev tags for pagination?
  39. 67:58 Should you really submit all paginated pages in the XML sitemap?
  40. 70:10 Should you really index all category pages to optimize your crawl budget?
  41. 70:18 Should you really stop placing category pages in noindex?
  42. 72:04 Does the number of JavaScript files really slow down Google indexing?
  43. 72:24 Does Googlebot really render all JavaScript in a single pass?
📅
Official statement from (6 years ago)
TL;DR

Google has officially announced that Web Vitals will only become a ranking signal after several months, giving webmasters time to adapt. This transition period allows for prioritizing other urgent tasks while also starting to lay the technical groundwork. In practical terms: no rush, but a strategic window to audit and plan optimizations gradually.

What you need to understand

Why is Google Announcing This Delay Before Activation?

Google has reversed its deployment schedule for Web Vitals as a ranking signal. The reason given? The global health situation is consuming the web teams' resources on other urgent priorities — adapting to remote work, emergency e-commerce, and managing unexpected traffic.

This official delay signals a rare thing: Google acknowledges that webmasters are stretched thin. Rather than imposing a major algorithm change amid a crisis, Mountain View is opting for caution. This is also a political signal — showing that they are listening to the dev and SEO community that has been calling out for relief.

What Does This Change for Live Sites?

In practical terms, the three metrics LCP, FID and CLS remain measurable via Search Console and PageSpeed Insights, but they do not currently penalize or boost positions. Sites that are currently thriving with a disastrous FID won't collapse overnight.

This also means that you can prioritize other critical SEO tasks — technical redesign, late HTTPS migration, cleaning up duplicate content — without feeling guilty for not having addressed Web Vitals yet. The delay is a rare luxury in SEO.

Does This Delay Change the Medium-Term Strategy?

No. The Core Web Vitals are coming; it's settled. This is just a shift in the timeline, not an abandonment. Sites that start auditing their performance now will have a head start when the signal actually activates.

The preparation window is widening, but it is not closing. Use this time to test, iterate, and prioritize quick-wins (lazy-loading images, font optimization) instead of scrambling to redesign everything at the last minute.

  • The Web Vitals are not yet an active ranking signal — no immediate impact on current positions
  • The delay is a strategic opportunity to audit without pressure and plan for gradual optimizations
  • Google explicitly recognizes the health situation as the reason for the delay — a rare signal of flexibility
  • The metrics remain measurable in Search Console and PageSpeed Insights to track progress
  • The deployment is delayed, not canceled — sites starting now will have a competitive advantage

SEO Expert opinion

Is This Statement Consistent with Observed Practices?

Yes, and that's actually concerning. Google usually rolls out algorithm changes without warning, or with vague announcements three days prior. Here, we have an official delay announced months in advance — it's almost suspiciously transparent.

On the ground, we see that many sites have no technical leeway to optimize metrics as front-end-focused as CLS or FID. Dev teams are tied up with business urgencies. Google likely realized that a forced deployment would create a massive uproar and accusations of exploiting a crisis to push an agenda.

What Nuances Should be Added to This Announcement?

The delay concerns activation as a ranking signal, not the strategic importance of Web Vitals. Google continues to emphasize that speed and user experience matter — simply, the stick is coming later than expected.

[To be verified]: Google does not specify whether the signal will be gradual (slow roll-out over several months) or binary (sudden activation at a fixed date). This is crucial for planning. If it’s a gradual roll-out, the first optimized sites will capture a huge competitive advantage. If it’s binary, we can wait until the last moment. No one has a clear answer on this point.

In What Cases Does This Rule Not Apply?

If your site is undergoing a complete redesign or technical migration, ignore this delay. It's the perfect time to integrate Web Vitals from the design phase, rather than patching them in a rush post-activation. Not leveraging this window would be a strategic mistake.

Similarly, if you're operating in an ultra-competitive niche (finance, health, insurance), your competitors won't wait. They will optimize now to gain an edge. In these verticals, a Google delay doesn't mean a delay in the SEO war.

Attention: The delay only concerns integration as an official ranking signal. The Core Web Vitals already indirectly influence user behavior — bounce rates, session duration — which impacts your positions through other signals. Do not treat this delay as a green light to completely ignore performance.

Practical impact and recommendations

What Should You Do During This Transition Period?

First step: audit your current Core Web Vitals via Search Console and PageSpeed Insights. You don’t need to correct everything now, but you need to know where you stand. Identify strategic pages (landing pages, high-traffic product pages) and measure their LCP, FID, and CLS.

Next, prioritize quick-wins that enhance both speed and user experience without a complete overhaul. Lazy-loading images, WebP compression, font optimization, eliminating blocking JavaScript on the critical rendering path. These are adjustments that yield results even without the activation of the ranking signal.

What Mistakes Should Be Avoided During This Delay?

Don’t fall into the trap of obsessive optimization on low-traffic pages. If your legal notices page has a CLS of 0.8, no one cares. Focus your efforts on the 20% of pages that generate 80% of your organic traffic.

Avoid patching symptoms without understanding the cause. A high LCP could stem from a slow server, unoptimized images, or a poorly configured CDN. If you fix the image without addressing the server, you're wasting your time. Always diagnose before taking action.

How Can You Ensure Your Site Will Be Ready in Time?

Set up continuous monitoring of Web Vitals using tools like Lighthouse CI integrated into CI/CD, or dedicated dashboards in Google Analytics. The goal: detect regressions before they become critical.

Test on real connections and various devices. PageSpeed Insights simulates a standardized connection profile, but your real users are on poor 3G, outdated Androids, with invasive Chrome extensions. Field data from Chrome UX Report is more reliable than lab tests.

  • Audit the Core Web Vitals of all strategic pages via Search Console and PageSpeed Insights
  • Identify technical quick-wins: lazy-loading, WebP compression, font optimization, elimination of blocking JavaScript
  • Prioritize high organic traffic pages — ignore marginal pages for now
  • Implement continuous monitoring of Web Vitals to detect regressions
  • Test on real connections and varied devices, not just in lab environments
  • Document the technical work needed for a phased redesign post-activation
The official delay of the Web Vitals as a ranking signal offers a rare strategic window to prepare your site without immediate pressure. Focus on high-traffic pages, identify technical quick-wins, and implement continuous monitoring. If these optimizations seem complex to manage alone — in-depth technical diagnosis, priority arbitration, dev-SEO coordination — it may be wise to rely on a specialized SEO agency that masters these performance tasks and can assist your team with a gradual and measured roadmap.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Les Core Web Vitals sont-ils déjà mesurés dans Search Console ?
Oui, ils sont mesurables et visibles dans le rapport Expérience sur la page de Search Console. Simplement, ils n'influencent pas encore les classements.
Faut-il abandonner toute optimisation de vitesse pendant le délai ?
Non. Les optimisations de vitesse améliorent déjà l'expérience utilisateur et impactent indirectement le SEO via le comportement (taux de rebond, durée de session). Le report concerne uniquement le signal de ranking officiel.
Google a-t-il donné une date précise d'activation après ce report ?
Non. L'annonce indique simplement que le déploiement n'aura pas lieu avant la fin de l'année mentionnée, sans fixer de date ferme. C'est un délai minimum, pas une deadline.
Les sites avec de mauvais Web Vitals perdent-ils déjà des positions ?
Non, pas tant que le signal n'est pas activé officiellement. En revanche, un site lent peut perdre des positions indirectement via des signaux comportementaux (utilisateurs qui rebondissent rapidement).
Ce report signifie-t-il que Google renonce aux Web Vitals ?
Absolument pas. C'est un décalage de timeline, pas un abandon. Le signal sera activé, simplement plus tard que prévu initialement.
🏷 Related Topics
Content AI & SEO

🎥 From the same video 43

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h14 · published on 04/06/2020

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.