Official statement
Google can understand meta refresh redirects without the need to execute JavaScript. This method is preferable to JavaScript redirects for static sites as it is detected earlier in the crawling process.
Other statements from this video 11 ▾
- □ Does Google Analytics Really Impact Your Site's SEO?
- □ How does Google really interpret JavaScript generated content?
- □ How does Google enhance link discovery through dual extraction?
- □ How are user queries truly transformed by Google?
- □ How does Google segment languages without spaces for SEO?
- □ Why doesn't Google use synonyms in its index?
- □ Why does Google sometimes keep stop words?
- □ How does Google automate stemming and spelling correction?
- □ Why do synonyms carry less weight than the original text in SEO?
- □ How does Google's diacritic expansion affect your SEO?
- □ How does a user's location influence Google's understanding of queries?
Official statement from
(4 years ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic
Should You Choose Meta Refresh or JavaScript for Your SEO Redirections?
View statement →
TL;DR
Google interprets meta refresh redirects without JavaScript. This is more efficient for static sites and is detected early in the crawl process. Opt for them over JavaScript redirects for better indexing.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Google peut-il interpréter les redirections meta refresh ?
Oui, sans avoir besoin d'exécuter JavaScript.
Les redirections meta refresh sont-elles mieux ?
Pour les sites statiques, elles sont souvent plus efficaces que JavaScript.
Dois-je revoir mes redirections actuelles ?
Oui, surtout si elles reposent sur JavaScript uniquement.
🎥 From the same video 11
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 27/05/2021
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.