Official statement
Other statements from this video 11 ▾
- 11:05 Does Googlebot really render pages like a user and should you be concerned about it?
- 15:05 Does hidden 'Click to Expand' content really harm your indexing?
- 19:30 Do nofollow links really fail to pass any ranking signals?
- 28:26 Why is Google speeding up the update cycle for Penguin?
- 28:26 Can Penguin really boost your ranking if you clean up your backlinks?
- 32:00 Does migrating to HTTPS really affect your site's ranking?
- 35:30 Should you really combine canonicals and hreflang for multilingual SEO?
- 35:30 Should you have a canonical URL for each language, or is Google oversimplifying things?
- 47:50 Do structured data really provide what it takes to feature in the Knowledge Graph?
- 53:31 Do HTTP errors 404 and 500 really affect your Google ranking?
- 55:04 How long can a 503 error last before Google decides to drop your page?
Google confirms that disavow files are treated like nofollow links, with a crucial nuance: the consideration spans 3 to 9 months, a necessary period to reassess all the affected backlinks. In practice, a disavow does not act immediately on your link profile. This latency requires strict anticipation: disavowing in a hurry does not save you from an ongoing penalty, and this timing must be integrated into any backlink cleanup strategy.
What you need to understand
What does 'treated similarly to nofollow links' really mean?
When Google claims to treat disavow files like nofollow links, it means that the listed links are ignored in the calculation of PageRank and ranking signals. The engine no longer transfers authority through these backlinks, as if the rel="nofollow" attribute had been placed at the source.
The major difference with a true nofollow is that you do not control the source link: you only ask Google to act as if that link does not exist. But this request must go through the recrawl and reindexing cycles of the source pages, hence the unavoidable delay.
Why is a delay of 3 to 9 months necessary?
Google does not instantly reassess all your backlinks the moment you upload your file. The engine must first recrawl the pages containing the disavowed links, then update its index, and finally propagate this information into its ranking algorithms.
A low authority site, which is rarely crawled, may see its links reassessed very slowly. In contrast, a backlink from a popular site might be processed in just a few weeks. The median delay of 3 to 9 months reflects this heterogeneity: some links quickly switch to 'ignored' mode, while others require multiple crawl cycles.
Does this gradual process directly impact my rankings?
Yes, but in a diffuse way. If you disavow 500 toxic links, you will not see a sudden jump in positions after 3 months. The effect dilutes: as Google recrawls the source pages, your link profile gradually cleanses itself.
In the case of an algorithmic penalty (historically Penguin), this delay could postpone the lifting of the sanction. Nowadays, with Penguin integrated in real time, the question is less binary: a cleaner link profile gradually enhances your signals, without a specific 'release date'.
- The disavow does not remove the link; it requests Google to ignore it in its calculations.
- The processing is asynchronous: each backlink is reassessed during the recrawl of its source page.
- A disavow file never acts instantly, even in urgent cases.
- The 3 to 9 month window corresponds to the average time for a significant set of links to be considered.
- Google does not provide any feedback on the advancement of the processing of your file.
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?
Yes, and it is even the first time that Google has explicitly officialized the duration of the process. In practice, SEOs have observed for years that a disavow file does not produce visible effects for several months. This confirmation from John Mueller puts an end to the speculations about a 'quasi-instant' treatment as some believed.
However, the range of 3 to 9 months remains broad. In my audits, I have seen cases where a massive disavow (several thousand domains) only showed measurable impact after 7 months. [To be verified]: Google does not specify whether this delay depends on the volume of links or solely on the crawl frequency of the source pages.
What nuances should be added to this rule?
First point: disavows only work if Google crawls the source pages. A backlink from a dead site, not crawled for months, may remain 'active' indefinitely in Google's index even after disavowal. The engine cannot ignore what it has not reassessed.
Second nuance: disavowing a quality link by mistake may slow its reintegration. If you remove a domain from the disavow file, Google will have to recrawl the affected backlinks again to reintegrate them into its calculations. Double latency, double trouble. Check twice before hitting 'Submit'.
In what cases can this processing fail or be incomplete?
The disavow file has technical limits: a maximum of 100,000 lines, 2 MB. If your link profile is massively polluted (some sites suffer from industrial negative SEO with millions of spam backlinks), you will not be able to cover everything. In this case, prioritize the most powerful toxic domains, not the thousands of ghost links without authority.
Another case of failure: a poorly formatted file. A syntax error (missing space after the #, absence of the domain: prefix) may invalidate entire lines. Google will not alert you. Test your file with a parser before upload.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you do before disavowing links?
Before touching the disavow file, always try manual cleanup. Contact the webmasters of the source sites to request removal or addition of a nofollow. This approach is quicker and avoids leaving toxic links 'in limbo' for months while waiting for a recrawl.
If manual cleanup fails (abandoned sites, unreachable webmasters), only then resort to disavowal. Document every attempt to contact: in case of a manual penalty, Google requires evidence that you attempted to clean up before disavowing.
How can you track the effect of a disavow file over several months?
It is impossible to track directly. Google does not provide any dashboard indicating '37% of your disavowed links have been processed.' You need to infer the impact via indirect metrics: changes in organic traffic, tracking positions for your strategic keywords, and analyzing the link profile through third-party tools (Ahrefs, Majestic).
Compare your link profile before and after disavowal: if toxic domains continue to appear in your top referring domains after 6 months, it means Google has not yet recrawled them. Then trigger a manual indexing via Search Console, although the effect remains limited on external pages.
What mistakes should be absolutely avoided when using the disavow file?
Number one mistake: disavowing in panic without prior audit. I have seen SEOs disavow hundreds of domains 'as a precaution,' including quality backlinks. The result: traffic drop, a 9-month delay to fix it. A disavow is not instantly reversible.
Second mistake: thinking a disavow protects against negative SEO in real time. If you receive 10,000 spam backlinks per week, the disavow file will not immediately stop the hemorrhage. You will need to update the file regularly and wait several months each time for Google to take the additions into account.
- Audit backlinks using multiple tools (Ahrefs, Majestic, Search Console) before deciding what to disavow.
- Always attempt manual cleanup before disavowal, and keep evidence of contact.
- Disavow at the domain level (domain:example.com) instead of page by page if the entire site is toxic.
- Check the format of the file (UTF-8, correct syntax, no special characters) before upload.
- Plan for tracking over a minimum of 9 months via positions, traffic, and third-party link profile.
- Never disavow a quality domain by mistake: the correction will take as long as the initial disavow.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Le fichier de désaveu agit-il plus vite sur les sites à fort crawl budget ?
Peut-on désavouer un lien déjà en nofollow ?
Faut-il désavouer les liens d'un site piraté temporairement ?
Un fichier de désaveu peut-il causer une chute de trafic ?
Dois-je mettre à jour mon fichier de désaveu régulièrement ?
🎥 From the same video 11
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 57 min · published on 17/11/2014
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.