Can a Slow Website Be Deindexed from Google Due to Poor Core Web Vitals?

Official statement

John Mueller indicated on Twitter that a site cannot be deindexed from the search engine based solely on the algorithm's analysis of its loading times and therefore Core Web Vitals criteria.

Source : Search Engine Roundtable

📅

Official statement from October 3, 2022 (3 years ago)

⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic Will Search Console's Core Web Vitals recommendations finally make a real differ... John Mueller · July 1, 2025 View statement →

What you need to understand

This official statement provides an important clarification about the real weight of Core Web Vitals in Google's algorithm. Contrary to some concerns expressed by webmasters, a site will never be purely and simply deindexed due to poor performance.

The Core Web Vitals (LCP, FID, CLS) do constitute a ranking signal, but their influence remains relatively marginal in the overall equation. Google has always prioritized content relevance and satisfaction of search intent as dominant factors.

This clarification allows us to put into perspective the importance of these technical metrics while reminding us that they nevertheless contribute to user experience and positioning.

Core Web Vitals cannot cause deindexation
Their weight in the algorithm remains low compared to content and relevance
They remain a minor but measurable ranking signal
User experience remains important beyond pure SEO

SEO Expert opinion

This statement is perfectly consistent with field observations from SEO professionals. We regularly observe that sites with mediocre Core Web Vitals maintain excellent rankings when their content is relevant and their authority established.

Nevertheless, a nuance is necessary: while speed doesn't trigger deindexation, it can create a negative cumulative effect. An extremely slow site combined with other problems (weak content, poor mobile experience, high bounce rate) can see its SEO performance gradually deteriorate.

Warning: In highly competitive sectors where multiple sites offer equivalent quality content, Core Web Vitals can make the difference between first and third position. Don't neglect them completely, but don't overestimate them either.

The pragmatic approach is to prioritize intelligently: first invest in quality content, SEO architecture and internal linking, then optimize technical performance in a second phase.

Practical impact and recommendations

Don't panic if your Core Web Vitals are in the red: your site is not at risk of deindexation
Prioritize your content strategy and semantic optimization before pure technical optimization
Invest in performance only if your content and authority are already solid
Monitor your direct competitors: if they all have excellent Core Web Vitals, it becomes a competitive advantage
Optimize progressively rather than aiming for immediate perfection on these metrics
Measure the real impact: test speed improvements and analyze whether they influence your rankings
Focus on overall user experience rather than on technical indicators alone

Core Web Vitals constitute a minor signal in Google's algorithm. Although they can never cause deindexation, they deserve proportionate attention, especially in competitive niches. The optimal balance consists of maintaining acceptable performance without sacrificing your efforts on more impactful levers such as content, links and architecture. These technical and strategic trade-offs often require experienced overall vision: many companies choose to collaborate with a specialized SEO agency to establish a balanced roadmap, adapt priorities to their specific competitive context, and avoid disproportionate investments in low-return optimizations.

Related statements

« Previous

Page Experience relies on real user data (field da...

Duplicate title tags pose problems for search opti...

« Back to results