What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

During a website redesign, redirect old URLs directly to their corresponding new URLs with a 301 status code, rather than to the homepage.
41:09
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 58:13 💬 EN 📅 31/05/2016 ✂ 13 statements
Watch on YouTube (41:09) →
Other statements from this video 12
  1. 7:07 Cache Google vs Fetch as Google : pourquoi votre page n'apparaît-elle pas comme vous la voyez ?
  2. 8:50 Peut-on vraiment cibler plusieurs pages pour le même mot-clé sans pénalité ?
  3. 13:43 Faut-il vraiment garder indexées vos pages de produits en rupture de stock ?
  4. 18:10 Votre CDN bloqué peut-il tuer l'indexation de vos images dans Google ?
  5. 20:04 Comment Google indexe-t-il vraiment les sites en Hindi Roman écrit en caractères latins ?
  6. 21:20 Faut-il vraiment choisir le responsive plutôt qu'un site mobile séparé ?
  7. 23:21 Fetch as Render est-il vraiment l'outil indispensable pour vérifier le rendu de vos pages ?
  8. 25:13 Les liens externes nuisent-ils vraiment au référencement ?
  9. 50:53 Les signaux sociaux ont-ils un impact direct sur le classement dans Google ?
  10. 55:00 Les balises rel='prev' et rel='next' sont-elles encore utiles pour gérer la pagination ?
  11. 56:57 Le guest blogging est-il vraiment acceptable pour le SEO selon Google ?
  12. 60:20 Google évalue-t-il vraiment l'autorité site par site ou page par page ?
📅
Official statement from (9 years ago)
TL;DR

Google requires individual 301 redirects between old and new URLs during a redesign, rather than a bulk redirect to the homepage. This practice preserves link equity (PageRank) and user experience, both of which are critical ranking signals. A massive redirect to the homepage dilutes your authority and generates unqualified traffic that harms your engagement metrics.

What you need to understand

Why does Google insist so much on individual redirects?

The logic is simple: each URL accumulates authority through the backlinks it receives. When you redirect an old page to its direct equivalent, you transfer that authority to the new destination. PageRank is preserved, and the link remains relevant for the user.

Redirecting to the homepage is like throwing that authority into a void. The user clicks on a link meant to take them to a specific article and ends up on your homepage instead. They leave immediately. Google registers this pogo-sticking as a negative signal: the destination doesn't match the initial search intent.

What technically happens with a 301 redirect?

The 301 code signals a permanent move. Google understands that the old URL no longer exists and must transfer all its signals to the new one. The transfer of authority is never perfect—there's always a slight percentage lost—but it's negligible compared to a redirect to the homepage.

A redirect to the homepage is technically a valid 301. However, Google treats it as a soft 404 in many cases: the destination page doesn't meet the intent, so the engine may decide to de-index the old URL without transferring the equity. You lose everything.

Does this rule really apply to all types of content?

Let's be honest: no. If you shut down an entire section of your site without a direct equivalent, you have no choice. But even in this case, redirecting to a close category page is preferable to sending users to the homepage. The idea is to minimize relevance loss.

For outdated content without a logical successor, a 410 Gone is often cleaner than an artificial redirect. Google appreciates clarity: if the resource no longer exists and has no replacement, it's best to say so outright. The 410 quickly frees up crawl budget faster than a redirect to a generic page.

  • Individual 301 redirects: maintain authority and thematic relevance between old and new URLs.
  • Bulk redirect to the homepage: dilutes PageRank, degrades UX, generates negative behavioral signals.
  • Potential soft 404: Google may ignore a 301 redirect to a non-relevant page and treat the old URL as deleted.
  • Alternative to 301: the 410 Gone for content that has been permanently removed without a logical equivalent.
  • Edge case: entire sections closed without a successor—prefer a redirect to the closest category rather than the homepage.

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with field observations?

Absolutely. In dozens of monitored migrations, sites that redirect to the homepage lose between 40 and 70% of their organic traffic in the three months following. Those who map out cleanly URL by URL see an initial drop of 10-20% that recovers in a few weeks. The difference is dramatic.

The problem is that many clients or decision-makers don't grasp the stakes. They see a redesign as a reset and think Google will ‘relearn’ their site. No. Google does not forget. It actively seeks to reconcile the old structure with the new. If you provide a shaky mapping, it penalizes the site.

What nuances should be added to this rule?

Not all pages deserve a redirect. An old URL with zero backlinks, zero traffic, and zero indexing can be left returning a 404 without harm. Exhaustive mapping is time-consuming: focus on pages that generate traffic or have incoming links.

Another point: redirect chains are toxic. If A redirects to B which redirects to C, Google seldom follows beyond the second jump. During a redesign, ensure that your new URLs do not themselves point to other redirects. Clean everything up before launch.

In what scenarios doesn't this rule strictly apply?

When you close a line of obsolete products without a direct replacement, redirecting to a relevant parent category remains acceptable. For example, if you stop a line of running shoes—redirect to the general 'Running Shoes' page, not the homepage. Google will accept the thematic logic.

For dated editorial content (news, past events), a 410 Gone is often more honest. Google understands that the information is no longer relevant and frees up crawl budget. [To be confirmed]: some complex cases (multilingual site, domain consolidation) may justify temporary redirects to intermediary pages, but this is rare and risky.

Attention: A poorly managed redesign can destroy years of SEO work in just a few days. The redirect mapping task should not be delegated to an intern or automated without manual validation. Every mistake costs traffic.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you practically do before launching a redesign?

Crawl your existing site with Screaming Frog or Oncrawl to extract the complete list of indexed URLs. Then export Google Analytics (URLs generating traffic over the past 12 months) and Google Search Console (URLs with impressions). Cross-reference these three sources to identify critical pages.

Build a mapping spreadsheet: column A = old URL, column B = corresponding new URL. For each row, manually verify that the theme and intent are aligned. If an old page has no strict equivalent, document the reason and propose an alternative (parent category, 410, 404).

What mistakes should be absolutely avoided during implementation?

Never redirect using JavaScript or via meta refresh. Google may ignore them or process them with a delay. 301 redirects must be server-side (Apache, Nginx, .htaccess, CDN rules). Test each redirect with a tool like Redirect Path or httpstatus.io before the launch.

Avoid temporary 302 redirects ‘while waiting to see’. Google will not transfer authority. If you’re uncertain about a destination, it’s better to leave a temporary 404 and redirect properly later than to create a chain or a poor permanent mapping.

How to check that everything works after migration?

Set up post-migration monitoring: watch server logs for unexpected 404s, track the evolution of organic traffic by segment (brand, generic, long tail), and inspect Google Search Console for crawling errors. A spike in 404s signals incomplete mapping.

Reinject your old XML sitemap into Search Console for a few weeks. Google will recrawl the old URLs, detect the 301s, and update its index. Concurrently, submit the new sitemap. Both must coexist briefly to accelerate the transition.

  • Crawl the current site (Screaming Frog, Oncrawl) and extract all indexed URLs
  • Cross-reference with Google Analytics and Search Console to identify pages with traffic and backlinks
  • Create a 1:1 mapping between old and new URLs, validating relevance manually
  • Implement 301 redirects server-side (Apache, Nginx, CDN) — never in JS
  • Test each redirect before going live (httpstatus.io, Redirect Path)
  • Submit both the old and new XML sitemaps to Google Search Console during the transition
  • Monitor 404s, organic traffic, and GSC errors for 3 months post-migration
A successful migration relies on meticulous mapping and flawless technical implementation. Individual 301 redirects are non-negotiable to preserve authority and traffic. These tasks are complex and time-consuming: hiring a specialized SEO agency ensures rigorous management and significantly limits visibility loss risks. Expert support secures the investment and accelerates traffic recovery post-redesign.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Puis-je utiliser des redirections 302 temporaires pendant une refonte pour « tester » avant de passer en 301 ?
Non. Les 302 ne transfèrent pas l'autorité et Google continuera de crawler l'ancienne URL indéfiniment. Si tu hésites sur une destination, laisse un 404 temporaire et redirige proprement ensuite en 301.
Combien de temps Google met-il à transférer l'autorité après une redirection 301 ?
Variable selon le crawl budget, mais généralement entre quelques jours et 2-3 semaines pour les pages stratégiques. Le transfert n'est jamais instantané et jamais total (légère perte d'autorité systématique).
Faut-il rediriger les URL sans trafic ni backlinks lors d'une refonte ?
Non, c'est une perte de temps. Concentre-toi sur les pages avec trafic organique, backlinks ou valeur stratégique. Les URL zombies peuvent rester en 404 sans impact négatif.
Que faire si je ferme une section entière sans équivalent direct ?
Redirige vers la catégorie parent la plus proche si elle existe, sinon vers une page hub thématique. En dernier recours, un 410 Gone est plus honnête qu'une redirection vers la home.
Les chaînes de redirections (A → B → C) posent-elles vraiment problème ?
Oui. Google suit rarement au-delà du deuxième saut et dilue l'autorité à chaque étape. Lors d'une refonte, toutes les redirections doivent pointer directement vers la destination finale.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History Domain Name Redirects

🎥 From the same video 12

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 58 min · published on 31/05/2016

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.