Official statement
Other statements from this video 12 ▾
- 5:19 Le schéma FAQ en B2B : opportunité réelle ou fausse bonne idée ?
- 7:21 Pourquoi les demandes de réexamen manuel peuvent-elles traîner pendant un mois ?
- 8:15 Pourquoi Google n'envoie aucun avertissement avant de pénaliser un site manuellement ?
- 9:56 Une action manuelle levée garantit-elle le retour des positions perdues ?
- 14:30 Peut-on soumettre une demande de réexamen manuel immédiatement après correction ?
- 16:44 Google peut-il retarder la levée d'une action manuelle si votre site récidive ?
- 22:38 La vitesse de chargement freine-t-elle vraiment le crawl et le classement Google ?
- 27:47 Pourquoi les nouveaux sites subissent-ils des fluctuations de classement pendant 6 à 9 mois ?
- 34:02 Faut-il vraiment pinger Google après chaque mise à jour de sitemap ?
- 37:19 L'hébergement mutualisé avec des sites spam peut-il pénaliser votre SEO ?
- 41:11 Faut-il dupliquer son contenu sur plusieurs domaines géographiques ?
- 50:03 Faut-il vraiment supprimer des pages pour améliorer son crawl budget et son classement ?
Google states that text on e-commerce category pages helps understand the context, but emphasizes the distinction between category and informational pages. For SEO, this means finding the right balance: enough content to provide context without turning the page into a blog. The main challenge remains not to dilute commercial intent with editorial content that doesn’t belong there.
What you need to understand
Why does Google emphasize this distinction between category and information?
When Mueller talks about "understanding the page," he refers to Google's ability to grasp the intent behind a URL. A category page must clearly signal that it is meant for navigation and purchase, not for information.
The historical problem in e-commerce: many sites have stuffed their categories with generic SEO text blocks positioned at the bottom of the page, often invisible to the user. Google has learned to detect this pattern and down-rank it. Mueller's statement is a reminder that the text should serve the user first, not just cram in keywords.
What amount of text is considered sufficient?
No official figures — and this is precisely where it gets tricky. Mueller doesn’t provide any metrics, no ranges, nothing concrete. We remain in the gray area of "useful but not too much."
In practice, we observe that 50-150 contextual words well-placed (above or between products) perform better than 500 words of SEO fluff in the footer. Placement and relevance take precedence over raw volume. An intro of 2-3 sentences that clarifies what the category contains usually does the trick.
How does Google distinguish a category from an informational page?
Google analyzes user behavior, HTML structure, and contextual signals. A category displays products, offers filters, and incorporates Schema.org Product structured data. An info page contains dense paragraphs, few commercial links, and extended reading time.
If your category resembles a blog post too closely (structure, text/product ratio, engagement), you create semantic confusion. Google may treat it as an informational page — and down-rank it for commercial queries.
- The text on a category must contextualize the products, not inform about a broad topic.
- The location of the text is as important as its content: avoid invisible footer blocks.
- Google detects patterns of SEO over-optimization (excessive keyword density, off-context text).
- Behavioral signals (bounce rate, product clicks) reinforce or invalidate the text's relevance.
- A category with too much editorial text risks being reclassified as an informational page.
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with what we observe in practice?
Yes and no. In principle, it aligns perfectly with what we see in production: categories with targeted short text outperform those with generic blocks. But Mueller remains vague — he quantifies nothing, gives no thresholds.
In practice, we find that categories without any text struggle to rank for competitive queries, unless the site has a massive domain authority. Conversely, categories with 300+ words of SEO fluff in the footer are often ignored by Google, which focuses on structural elements (H1 title, breadcrumb, products). [To be verified]: the exact correlation between text volume and performance remains unclear, as it largely depends on the industry and competition.
What nuances should be added to this recommendation?
The distinction between category and information is not binary. In certain sectors — fashion, home decor, specialized tech — a category can legitimately include light editorial content (buying guides, selection criteria) as long as it remains subordinate to the products.
The real criterion: user intent. If someone searches for "men's trail shoes", they want to compare products, not read 500 words on the history of trail running. But for "how to choose trail shoes", a category enriched with a short guide can capture this query without distorting the page. The balance depends on the target query, not a universal rule.
In what cases does this rule not apply?
Hybrid categories — sometimes called "commercial landing pages" — escape this strict logic. If you are targeting an informational query with strong latent purchase intent, you can structure a page that is part guide, part category.
Concrete example: a page titled "best running shoes 2025" can technically be a category, but it requires editorial text to justify the term "best." Google tolerates this format as long as the structure remains clear: editorial intro followed by dominant products. But beware — this is not a free pass to turn all your categories into articles. It is a specific use case, not a global strategy.
Practical impact and recommendations
What concrete actions should be taken on your category pages?
Start with an audit of your existing categories. Identify those that have text: where is it located, how many words, what tone? Compare performance (positions, CTR, conversion rates) between categories with and without text.
Next, add text where it’s lacking, but do it intelligently. Write 2-3 sentences that explain what the category contains, why it exists, and for whom. Place this text above the products or just after the H1, not in the footer. Test the impact over 30-60 days.
What mistakes should be absolutely avoided?
Never duplicate the same generic text across multiple categories by just changing the keyword. Google detects semantic duplicate content and it hurts your crawl budget. Each category deserves unique text, even if it’s short.
Avoid invisible text blocks (accordions closed by default, white text on white backgrounds, off-screen content for mobile). Google considers them soft cloaking — not directly penalizing, but it diminishes the weight of the content. If the user doesn’t see it easily, Google will devalue it.
How to check if your categories are well perceived by Google?
Use the URL Inspection Tool in Search Console to see the HTML rendering as perceived by Googlebot. Check that your text is indexed and not marked as "hidden" or of "low importance."
Also, look at impression queries in Search Console: if your category appears for purely informational queries (e.g., "history of trail running") while you sell products, it's a signal that Google confuses it with an info page. Adjust the content accordingly.
- Audit all categories: text volume, placement, compared performance.
- Add 50-150 unique contextual words per category, placed above the products.
- Remove generic footer blocks and duplicated texts between categories.
- Verify the Googlebot rendering via Search Console for each modified category.
- Monitor impression queries to detect any confusion between category/info.
- Test the impact on positions and CTR over a minimum of 60 days.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Combien de mots minimum faut-il sur une page catégorie ?
Le texte en bas de page catégorie est-il encore utile en SEO ?
Peut-on utiliser le même texte sur plusieurs catégories similaires ?
Comment savoir si Google considère ma catégorie comme une page info ?
Les catégories sans aucun texte peuvent-elles ranker ?
🎥 From the same video 12
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 58 min · published on 20/03/2020
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.