What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 3 questions

Less than 30 seconds. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~30s 🎯 3 questions 📚 SEO Google

Official statement

Google does not use the 'changefreq' (change frequency) tag in XML sitemap files. It is impossible for site owners to accurately predict how often a page will actually change, making this information unreliable.
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

💬 EN 📅 05/05/2022 ✂ 12 statements
Watch on YouTube →
Other statements from this video 11
  1. Faut-il supprimer la balise 'priority' de vos sitemaps ?
  2. Pourquoi Google ignore-t-il la balise 'lastmod' dans vos sitemaps ?
  3. Faut-il encore remplir la balise lastmod dans vos sitemaps XML ?
  4. Pourquoi soumettre un sitemap ne garantit-il pas le crawl de vos URLs ?
  5. Faut-il remplacer les extensions de sitemap par des données structurées ?
  6. Faut-il abandonner les balises vidéo et image dans vos sitemaps XML ?
  7. Faut-il mettre à jour lastmod quand on ajoute des données structurées ?
  8. Pourquoi créer un sitemap révèle-t-il plus de problèmes techniques qu'il n'en résout ?
  9. Pourquoi les identifiants de session en paramètres URL menacent-ils encore le crawl de votre site ?
  10. Un site crawlable garantit-il vraiment une meilleure navigation utilisateur ?
  11. Faut-il vraiment attendre le crawl même après avoir soumis ses URLs via API ?
📅
Official statement from (3 years ago)
TL;DR

Google completely ignores the 'changefreq' tag in your sitemap files. Why? It's impossible to reliably predict how often a page will actually be updated, making this data unusable for the algorithm. Bottom line: you're wasting your time including it.

What you need to understand

Why does Google reject this tag?

The changefreq tag has been part of the standard XML sitemap protocol for years. In theory, it allows you to indicate how often a page is modified: daily, weekly, monthly, etc.

The problem? This information relies on human prediction, not technical reality. A webmaster can declare that a page changes daily when it actually remains static for months — or vice versa.

Has this information ever actually been used?

Gary Illyes' statement doesn't clarify whether Google ever exploited this tag. What is certain today: the algorithm does not take it into account in its crawling decisions.

Google has its own mechanisms to detect real changes on your pages: DOM analysis, comparison of crawled versions, behavioral signals. The changefreq tag adds nothing that these systems don't already detect.

What about the other sitemap tags?

This statement concerns only changefreq. The tags loc (URL), lastmod (last modification date), and priority remain in the standard protocol.

Be careful though: if Google ignores changefreq for the reasons mentioned, there's no guarantee it gives significant weight to priority either. The lastmod tag, on the other hand, can be useful if it reflects actual content modifications.

  • Google does not use changefreq in its crawling algorithms
  • The impossibility of reliably predicting changes makes this data unusable
  • Other sitemap tags (loc, lastmod) are not affected by this statement
  • Google relies on its own change detectors rather than your declarations

SEO Expert opinion

Is this position consistent with what we observe in practice?

Honestly, yes. For years, empirical tests show no correlation between the changefreq value and actual crawl frequency. Sites with changefreq="daily" might be crawled once a week, and vice versa.

What really impacts crawl frequency is your domain's crawl budget, the perceived freshness of your content, your authority, and user behavioral signals. Not a declarative XML tag.

Why does this tag still exist then?

Good question. The sitemap protocol was developed jointly by Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft — at a time when search engines were still figuring out how to optimize their crawling. Changefreq was an attempt at collaboration with webmasters.

Except in practice, this collaboration turned into an incentive to lie: many CMS platforms automatically generated changefreq="daily" for all pages, hoping to boost their crawl. Result: polluted data, therefore unusable.

[To verify]: Gary Illyes doesn't specify whether other engines (Bing, Yandex) still use this tag. It's possible some use it as a weak signal, but no official confirmation exists.

Should you worry about having this tag in your sitemaps?

No. Google ignores it, so it won't penalize you for it. If your CMS automatically generates changefreq, it's not catastrophic — it's just pointless.

The real risk would be wasting time manually optimizing this tag thinking you'll influence crawl frequency. Focus instead on lastmod if you can guarantee its reliability, and especially on the actual quality of your content.

Warning: if your sitemap contains thousands of changefreq tags with randomly generated values, this can unnecessarily bloat the file. A lighter sitemap parses more quickly — though the impact remains marginal.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you concretely do with changefreq?

If your CMS automatically generates this tag and you don't have easy access to the configuration, forget about it. It's not a priority. Googlebot will ignore it anyway.

If you're building a new sitemap or have control over its generation, you might as well not include changefreq. Fewer lines, lighter sitemap, simplified maintenance.

What should you focus your efforts on instead?

The lastmod tag deserves more attention — provided it reflects actual content modifications. Don't update lastmod if you only change a comma in the footer.

Google detects false freshness signals. If you manipulate lastmod to suggest frequent updates when the content remains identical, you risk eroding the trust accorded to your sitemaps.

Focus instead on your sitemap structure: separate by content type, by actual update frequency, by business priority. A well-organized sitemap makes Googlebot's job easier and improves crawl efficiency.

How to verify that your sitemap is optimized?

  • Test your sitemap in Search Console to detect syntax errors
  • Verify that lastmod reflects actual content changes, not cosmetic updates
  • Remove changefreq if you have easy access to sitemap generation
  • Segment your sitemaps by content type if your site exceeds 10,000 URLs
  • Monitor crawl stats in Search Console to detect anomalies
  • Ensure all sitemap URLs return a 200 code and are truly indexable
The bottom line: don't waste time on changefreq. Focus on the quality and reliability of lastmod, and especially on the overall architecture of your sitemaps. Technical crawl optimization comes through a systemic approach — not by tweaking isolated tags. These diagnostics and decisions can quickly become complex on high-volume sites or with specific technical architectures. In such cases, support from a specialized SEO agency allows you to precisely identify priority levers and avoid time-consuming false leads.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Dois-je supprimer changefreq de mes sitemaps existants ?
Non, ce n'est pas une urgence. Google ignore cette balise, il ne vous pénalisera pas pour sa présence. Supprimez-la si c'est facile techniquement, sinon concentrez vos efforts ailleurs.
La balise priority est-elle également ignorée par Google ?
Google n'a jamais confirmé officiellement ignorer priority, mais aucun test empirique ne montre d'impact mesurable. Considérez-la comme un signal faible au mieux, probablement ignoré dans la pratique.
Comment Google décide-t-il vraiment de la fréquence de crawl ?
Google analyse la fréquence réelle de modification de vos pages, votre crawl budget, l'autorité du domaine, les signaux comportementaux des utilisateurs, et la fraîcheur perçue du contenu. Pas vos déclarations XML.
La balise lastmod est-elle utile alors ?
Oui, si elle reflète de véritables modifications de contenu. Ne la manipulez pas artificiellement pour simuler de la fraîcheur — Google détecte ces manœuvres et pourrait perdre confiance en vos signaux.
Bing et les autres moteurs utilisent-ils changefreq ?
Aucune déclaration officielle des autres moteurs n'existe sur ce point. Il est possible que certains l'exploitent comme signal faible, mais sans confirmation ni donnée mesurable.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History Crawl & Indexing AI & SEO PDF & Files Search Console

🎥 From the same video 11

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 05/05/2022

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.