What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

Links in press releases should be used carefully. If they are designed to acquire backlinks, that is considered unnatural. Mentioning the URL without a link or with 'nofollow' is recommended.
28:09
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 1h04 💬 EN 📅 09/05/2014 ✂ 25 statements
Watch on YouTube (28:09) →
Other statements from this video 24
  1. 3:13 404 ou 410 : quelle erreur HTTP choisir pour accélérer la désindexation d'une URL ?
  2. 5:13 Google supporte-t-il vraiment la directive crawl-delay dans robots.txt ?
  3. 5:17 Pourquoi Google ignore-t-il la directive crawl-delay dans robots.txt ?
  4. 7:52 Comment écrire rel=nofollow sans risquer d'être ignoré par Google ?
  5. 8:54 Comment Google gère-t-il vraiment l'indexation des URLs avec paramètres ?
  6. 9:12 La balise canonique évite-t-elle vraiment l'indexation des URLs à paramètres ?
  7. 11:44 Le texte incrusté dans les images est-il invisible pour Google ?
  8. 11:57 Pourquoi Google peine-t-il à lire le texte intégré dans vos images ?
  9. 15:17 Le fichier disavow agit-il vraiment au moment du crawl ou plus tard ?
  10. 15:17 Le cache Google révèle-t-il vraiment l'impact de vos backlinks désavoués ?
  11. 18:17 Google privilégie-t-il vraiment le desktop pour le classement des sites responsive ?
  12. 19:58 Faut-il vraiment pointer le mobile vers le desktop avec rel=canonical ?
  13. 20:25 Faut-il vraiment utiliser 'noindex' pour économiser des ressources de crawl ?
  14. 22:14 La pagination affecte-t-elle vraiment l'indexation de vos pages ?
  15. 24:02 Pourquoi vos rich snippets disparaissent-ils du jour au lendemain ?
  16. 24:17 Pourquoi Google refuse-t-il d'afficher vos rich snippets malgré un balisage Schema.org impeccable ?
  17. 33:26 Faut-il vraiment noindexer toutes les pages de coupons sans offres actives ?
  18. 36:08 Le texte ALT des images influence-t-il vraiment l'indexation et le classement dans Google ?
  19. 37:21 Reformuler des articles de news suffit-il encore pour ranker sur Google ?
  20. 40:58 Faut-il vraiment attendre la prochaine mise à jour Penguin pour sortir d'une pénalité ?
  21. 49:00 Comment Google détecte-t-il qu'une requête nécessite l'affichage de Maps dans les résultats ?
  22. 52:29 Le désaveu de liens protège-t-il vraiment contre le netlinking négatif ?
  23. 56:37 Les mots-clés dans les URLs influencent-ils vraiment le classement Google ?
  24. 62:16 Un site avec quelques pages uniques mais beaucoup de contenu dupliqué risque-t-il une pénalité globale ?
📅
Official statement from (12 years ago)
TL;DR

Google views links in press releases as unnatural if they are deliberately aimed at acquiring backlinks. The official recommendation is to mention the URL without an active link or to use the nofollow attribute. This stance highlights a gray area where the line between legitimate promotion and PageRank manipulation remains blurred. SEOs need to rethink their approach to press releases as a linking channel.

What you need to understand

Why is Google targeting links in press releases?

Press releases have long served as a favored channel for obtaining backlinks on a large scale. The mechanism is simple: a release distributed via specialized platforms gets republished on dozens of news sites, creating as many incoming links to the advertiser's site.

Google identifies this pattern as PageRank manipulation. The search engine struggles to distinguish between an editorial link and a link automatically generated by syndication. Mueller’s directive aligns with ongoing anti-spam guidelines: any link created primarily to improve rankings is deemed unnatural.

What is meant by a link 'designed to acquire backlinks'?

This is where the ambiguity persists. A legitimate press release announces an event, a product, or an appointment. The link to the company's site fits in naturally. However, if the release is primarily written to generate backlinks, featuring optimized anchors and massive distribution on low-quality platforms, the intent becomes questionable.

Google does not detail the specific assessment criteria. The line between legitimate corporate communication and aggressive SEO tactics remains subjective. A release sent to three targeted media outlets does not hold the same value as automated distribution across 200 obscure platforms.

What does 'mentioning the URL without a link or using nofollow' actually mean?

The technical recommendation is clear: either display the URL in plain text (https://example.com) or use a link with the rel="nofollow" attribute. In both cases, the goal is to prevent the transfer of PageRank. The link can remain clickable for human readers, but it does not contribute to the site's link profile.

This approach transforms press releases into tools for visibility and direct traffic, but not as levers for natural SEO. SEOs accustomed to counting backlinks as a success metric must revise their strategy. A well-placed release in a high-audience media outlet generates qualified traffic and conversions, even without link juice.

  • Links in mass-distributed press releases are considered unnatural by Google
  • The official recommendation: URL in plain text or nofollow link
  • The distinction between legitimate promotion and SEO manipulation remains blurry and subjective
  • A press release retains its value for direct traffic and brand visibility
  • Automated distribution platforms are particularly at risk

SEO Expert opinion

Does this statement reflect the reality of observed penalties?

On the ground, penalties related to press releases remain rare and targeted. Sanctioned sites are typically those that massively abuse the technique: hundreds of releases per month, overly optimized anchors, low-quality syndication platforms. Moderate and contextual use often escapes detection.

The real risk concerns the automated distribution sites themselves. Many have seen their authority drop after algorithmic updates. The links they pass on have lost their weight, even without explicit penalties. The signal has diluted. [To verify]: Google has never published data on the percentage of sites penalized for this specific reason.

Is nofollow really enough to protect oneself?

Technically, yes. A nofollow link does not pass PageRank according to Google's official logic. But the algorithmic reality is more nuanced. Since the introduction of the sponsored and ugc attributes, Google treats nofollow as a hint rather than an absolute directive. The engine may choose to follow these links depending on the context.

For press releases, this nuance matters little: Google likely identifies the distribution pattern itself. The nofollow attribute primarily serves as a signal of intent: 'we do not seek to manipulate the rankings'. It acts as legal protection more than a technical guarantee. A site distributing 50 press releases per month, even using nofollow, raises eyebrows.

Should we completely abandon press releases for SEO?

No. It is essential to refocus their use on their primary purpose: disseminating information to journalists and targeted audiences. A release that generates articles written by journalists, featuring natural editorial links, remains a powerful SEO leverage. The issue lies with automatic syndication, not press relations.

The winning approach: invest in quality releases, sent to relevant media likely to produce original content. An article in TechCrunch or Les Échos is worth a thousand links from generic platforms. ROI is measured in brand mentions, qualified traffic, and business opportunities, not in the number of backlinks.

Warning: PR agencies promising '100 guaranteed backlinks' through press releases are likely using risky tactics. Demand transparency regarding the platforms used and prioritize quality over quantity.

Practical impact and recommendations

How can you adjust your press release strategy without risks?

The first action: audit existing press releases. Identify those that have been massively distributed with dofollow links. If you find hundreds of links from low-quality platforms, consider targeted disavowal via Google Search Console. The priority: clean up the most obvious manipulation patterns.

Next, reformulate your approach. A press release is not a blog post optimized for SEO. Its purpose is to inform journalists, not crawlers. Write for a human who will decide whether or not to write an article. Overly optimized link anchors like 'accounting expert Paris 15' destroy any credibility with editors.

Which distribution platforms should be prioritized or avoided?

Avoid low-cost mass automated distribution services. Platforms promising 500 republishing sites for €50 are red flags. Their networks often consist of ghost sites, abandoned blogs, or content farms. Google knows them and ignores them.

Favor professional press wires (AFP, Reuters for international) or sector-specific platforms with a strong journalistic audience. A well-placed release on PR Newswire, even with nofollow, reaches thousands of journalists who may then write articles with natural links. This second layer generates real SEO value.

How to measure the success of a press release without counting backlinks?

Change your KPIs. A successful press release generates original editorial pickups, measurable direct traffic via UTM, brand mentions (linked or not), and conversions. Track spikes in searches for your brand name on Google Trends: it's a much more reliable visibility indicator than a link counter.

Use tools like Google Alerts or Mention to monitor pickups. An original article in a reputable media outlet, even with a nofollow link or simple textual mention of your URL, strengthens your thematic authority. Google understands these contextual signals and incorporates them into its evaluation of E-E-A-T.

  • Convert all links in existing releases to nofollow or remove active links
  • Disavow low-quality syndication domains identified in your link profile
  • Stop using SEO-optimized anchors in releases: favor brand name or raw URL
  • Limit distribution to platforms with a strong journalistic audience
  • Track editorial pickups and direct traffic rather than the number of backlinks
  • Train PR teams on best SEO practices to avoid risky tactics
Press releases remain a powerful communication tool, but their SEO role has changed. They should generate visibility and direct traffic, not artificial backlinks. This transition requires a strategic overhaul: from writing to distribution, everything must be reevaluated within an editorial rather than a technical logic. The necessary optimizations affect content creation, channel selection, and performance monitoring. This complexity often justifies support from a specialized SEO agency capable of auditing your current strategy, identifying risks in your link profile, and guiding you towards compliant practices while maximizing your visibility.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Un communiqué de presse avec lien nofollow a-t-il encore une valeur SEO ?
Indirectement, oui. Il ne transmet pas de PageRank, mais peut générer du trafic qualifié, des mentions de marque et des reprises éditoriales avec liens naturels. La valeur est dans la visibilité, pas dans le lien technique.
Faut-il désavouer les liens de vieux communiqués de presse distribués en masse ?
Si vous constatez des centaines de liens depuis des plateformes de faible qualité avec des ancres suroptimisées, un désaveu ciblé est prudent. Concentrez-vous sur les domaines les plus suspects identifiés dans votre profil de liens.
Les journalistes peuvent-ils mettre des liens dofollow s'ils reprennent mon communiqué ?
Oui. Un lien éditorial ajouté par un journaliste dans un article original est naturel et légitime. Le problème concerne la syndication automatique, pas les reprises éditoriales contextuelles.
Combien de communiqués de presse peut-on diffuser par mois sans risque ?
Il n'y a pas de seuil officiel. La fréquence doit correspondre à votre actualité réelle. Une startup qui envoie 20 communiqués par mois paraît suspecte. Une multinationale avec des annonces régulières, c'est cohérent. La crédibilité prime.
Les plateformes comme PR Newswire ou Business Wire sont-elles considérées comme à risque par Google ?
Non, ces plateformes professionnelles reconnues ne sont pas ciblées. Le risque concerne les services de distribution automatique low-cost qui republient sur des centaines de sites de faible qualité sans validation éditoriale.
🏷 Related Topics
Links & Backlinks Domain Name

🎥 From the same video 24

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h04 · published on 09/05/2014

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.