What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

A correctly performed HTTP to HTTPS migration should not have any negative impact on ranking. If significant losses are observed, other causes should be investigated or reported to Google for analysis.
14:48
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 1h05 💬 EN 📅 03/11/2014 ✂ 58 statements
Watch on YouTube (14:48) →
Other statements from this video 57
  1. 1:02 Why does Penguin cause ranking fluctuations weeks after its announcement?
  2. 1:02 What causes your site to disappear and then reappear during the Penguin rollout?
  3. 1:02 Why does the Penguin rollout lead to unpredictable ranking fluctuations?
  4. 1:35 Should you really submit your disavow file daily for it to be effective?
  5. 1:35 Do you really need to wait for Penguin for the disavow file to be considered?
  6. 1:35 Does the disavow file work continuously or in waves?
  7. 12:30 Does switching to HTTPS really slow down your site in Google's eyes?
  8. 12:42 Does switching to HTTPS really slow down your site and affect your SEO?
  9. 13:02 Does switching to HTTPS really slow down your website?
  10. 14:28 Is switching from HTTP to HTTPS really risk-free for your rankings?
  11. 14:48 Is migrating to HTTPS really risk-free for your SEO?
  12. 19:26 Should you really set all widget links to nofollow by default?
  13. 19:34 Should all widget links really be nofollow?
  14. 19:34 Should you really enforce nofollow on all third-party widget links?
  15. 22:42 Do DMCA complaints really harm a website's SEO?
  16. 24:14 Can you really block the flow of PageRank with robots.txt on a middle page?
  17. 27:07 Does Google really detect negative SEO, or should you still actively protect yourself?
  18. 27:27 Is negative SEO really the reason behind your traffic losses?
  19. 27:55 Can Google really detect and neutralize negative SEO automatically?
  20. 30:36 Do you really need to disavow every spammy backlink you find?
  21. 31:41 Do DMCA complaints really take pages out of Google's index?
  22. 31:54 Do DMCA complaints really deindex your pages, or do they just hide them?
  23. 32:44 Do links between language versions of a site really trigger a Penguin penalty?
  24. 32:44 Could the language links on your multilingual site set off Penguin?
  25. 32:44 Do interlanguage links without nofollow trigger a Penguin penalty?
  26. 33:16 How many results from the same site can Google show in its SERPs?
  27. 36:26 How does Panda really balance positive and negative signals to rate a site?
  28. 36:26 Does Panda really evaluate websites holistically or is it just focused on penalizing?
  29. 36:36 Does Panda really calculate an overall quality score instead of just penalizing sites?
  30. 37:38 Does mobile compatibility really influence Google rankings?
  31. 37:58 Is mobile compatibility really a ranking factor?
  32. 37:58 Is mobile-friendliness really a Google ranking factor or just an SEO myth?
  33. 39:03 Why does Google refuse to notify which algorithm is penalizing your site in Search Console?
  34. 39:03 Do Google algorithms really serve to guide webmasters?
  35. 39:03 Can Google's algorithms really guide your SEO strategy?
  36. 41:06 Should we stop chasing after Google's algorithms?
  37. 41:58 Will Search Console finally tell us exactly what to fix?
  38. 44:47 Can Google show 10 results from the same domain in its SERPs?
  39. 44:47 Can Google really display 10 results from the same domain in a SERP?
  40. 44:47 Can your hosting IP really harm your SEO rankings?
  41. 47:47 Why do your position-tracking tools show a different reality than Search Console?
  42. 47:49 Why do Search Console positions never match those of your tracking tools?
  43. 48:27 Does Search Console really show the positions your users see?
  44. 49:47 Are websites on the same IP selling the same products penalized for duplicate content?
  45. 50:08 Does shared hosting really harm your Google rankings?
  46. 54:13 Should you really delete old articles to escape Panda?
  47. 54:13 Should you really delete old blog posts for Panda?
  48. 54:13 Should you delete your old blog posts to avoid a Panda penalty?
  49. 55:23 Should you still disavow backlinks from third-party SERPs and public stats tools?
  50. 55:23 Should we really ignore links from stat pages and external SERPs?
  51. 55:23 Should you disavow links from public statistics and non-indexed pages?
  52. 56:59 Is negative SEO really the reason behind your traffic drops?
  53. 56:59 Is Negative SEO Hiding Your Own Link Building Mistakes?
  54. 59:38 Does noindex really protect your site from quality algorithms?
  55. 59:38 Do noindexed pages really escape Google's quality algorithms?
  56. 59:38 Does using noindex truly protect your site from algorithmic penalties?
  57. 61:14 How many results from the same domain can Google show in the SERPs?
📅
Official statement from (11 years ago)
TL;DR

Google claims that a properly executed HTTPS migration does not cause any ranking loss. If significant drops occur, look for other issues: broken redirects, lost content, technical errors. The main challenge is execution: a poorly migrated HTTPS becomes a liability, while a clean implementation remains invisible in organic positions.

What you need to understand

Why does Google stress that there's no penalty related to HTTPS?

Google has turned HTTPS into a positive ranking signal for several years. The official goal: to push the entire web towards a secure protocol. But this bonus only works if the migration itself is flawless.

Mueller reminds us of a simple principle: HTTPS itself is not a risk factor. If your rankings plummet after switching to HTTPS, it’s not the protocol that’s the issue, but how you orchestrated the transition. The underlying message? Google doesn’t want the fear of a decline to hinder the adoption of HTTPS.

What does Google mean by a 'correctly executed' HTTPS migration?

The formula remains vague, but we can deduce the fundamentals. A successful HTTPS migration preserves the URL structure intact (except for the change from http:// to https://), maintains all clean 301 redirects, and avoids breaking the internal linking.

Google also expects you to update Search Console with the new HTTPS property, submit an appropriate sitemap, and monitor SSL certificate errors. If these steps are neglected, bots might encounter issues that have nothing to do with HTTPS itself but everything to do with your technical execution.

How can we explain ranking losses observed after migration?

If your rankings dive post-HTTPS, the real cause lies elsewhere. Chained redirects, duplicated content between HTTP and HTTPS that isn't canonicalized, resources blocked by robots.txt, loading times degraded by poor SSL configuration: these are all classic traps.

Mueller suggests reporting problematic cases to Google, but this statement sounds more like a rhetorical safety net. In practice, 99% of post-migration losses stem from human or technical errors, not from an algorithmic bug.

  • A well-conducted HTTPS migration has no negative impact on ranking
  • Ranking drops reveal implementation errors, not a protocol-related penalty
  • Clean 301 redirects and consistent canonicals are the pillars of a successful transition
  • Search Console and sitemaps must be updated simultaneously
  • SSL or certificate errors block crawling and sabotage indexing

SEO Expert opinion

Does this statement match ground observations?

Yes, but with significant nuances. On well-prepared sites, the HTTPS migration indeed goes without visible drama. Rankings may fluctuate for a few days while Google recrawls and consolidates signals, then everything stabilizes.

The problem arises when working on complex sites: thousands of pages, multiple subdomains, a complicated redirection history. Here, the slightest misstep becomes a multiplier of chaos. A single misconfigured Apache rule can turn a clean migration into a traffic hemorrhage. Mueller simplifies a bit too much by talking about a 'correctly executed migration,' as if it were just a checkbox.

What critical errors most often sabotage an HTTPS migration?

Chained redirects come out on top: HTTP to HTTPS via a 301, then HTTPS without www to HTTPS with www via another 301. Google follows, but dilutes PageRank with each hop. Another classic: forgetting to update internal links that still point to HTTP, forcing bots to follow unnecessary redirects.

Then there’s mixed content: resources (images, scripts, CSS) loaded over HTTP on HTTPS pages. Browsers block or alert users, and Google may index a degraded version. Finally, some SEOs neglect to check that all old HTTP URLs are properly redirected, leaving orphaned HTTP pages indexed alongside.

In what cases does this rule not fully apply?

Mueller talks about a 'correctly executed migration,' but some contexts complicate the matter. Sites with multiple language or geo-targeted versions multiply friction points: hreflang needing updates, cross-canonical tags, geo-dependent redirects. An error in the matrix can fragment signals.

E-commerce platforms with thousands of product variations and parameterized URLs also pose problems. If the URL generation logic changes slightly during migration, Google may see it as a structural change, not just a switch to HTTPS. [To verify]: Google does not precisely document how it handles HTTPS migrations on multi-CDN architectures with dynamic protocol failover.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you check before launching a HTTPS migration?

Start with a complete audit of existing redirects. If your site already uses 301 chains, flatten them before adding a HTTPS layer. Make sure your SSL certificate covers all relevant subdomains (wildcard or SAN based on architecture).

Next, ensure that your CMS or platform properly generates all internal URLs in HTTPS. A simple missed setting in WordPress, Shopify, or Magento can leave thousands of internal links pointing to HTTP, wasting crawl budget and diluting authority. Test in a staging environment before moving to production.

How can you monitor a HTTPS migration in real-time?

Activate a new HTTPS property in Search Console on the launch day. Submit a complete HTTPS sitemap and monitor coverage errors. The 'Non-indexed Pages' reports quickly reveal broken redirects or SSL errors.

Simultaneously, set up Google Analytics alerts for organic traffic metrics and conversions. A sharp drop within the first 48 hours often signals a redirect or robots.txt issue. Use a tool like Screaming Frog to crawl your site in HTTPS and identify mixed content resources before Google detects them.

What corrective actions should you take if losses appear?

If traffic drops post-migration, don’t panic immediately. Allow 7 to 10 days for Google to recrawl and consolidate. If the drop persists, audit server logs: how many requests does Googlebot get resulting in 4xx or 5xx errors? How many chained redirects appear?

Also check that canonical tags correctly point to the HTTPS versions, and that your XML sitemaps do not mix HTTP and HTTPS. If you have notified Google via Search Console about the property migration (Change of Address), ensure this request has been processed. As a last resort, manually submit key URLs via the URL Inspection tool to force a rapid recrawl.

  • Audit and flatten all existing redirects before migration
  • Configure a valid SSL certificate covering all subdomains
  • Update all internal links to point directly to HTTPS
  • Create a new HTTPS property in Search Console and submit an updated sitemap
  • Monitor for SSL errors, mixed content, and chained redirects during post-migration crawl
  • Analyze server logs and Google Analytics during the first two weeks
A successful HTTPS migration relies on meticulous preparation and active monitoring. If you're managing a complex site or lack technical expertise in-house, it may be wise to enlist a specialized SEO agency to orchestrate this transition and avoid costly pitfalls.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Le passage en HTTPS améliore-t-il directement le classement ?
Le HTTPS est un signal de ranking positif léger, mais son impact reste marginal. L'absence de HTTPS peut en revanche nuire à la confiance utilisateur et au taux de conversion, surtout sur mobile.
Faut-il rediriger chaque URL HTTP individuellement ou une règle globale suffit-elle ?
Une règle serveur globale (via .htaccess ou nginx.conf) redirige automatiquement toutes les URLs HTTP vers HTTPS. C'est plus efficace et moins risqué que des redirections manuelles page par page.
Combien de temps Google met-il pour recrawler un site après migration HTTPS ?
Cela dépend de la fréquence de crawl habituelle. Pour un site actif, comptez 2 à 7 jours. Les sites moins fréquents peuvent nécessiter plusieurs semaines. Search Console accélère le processus via l'outil d'inspection.
Les backlinks pointant vers HTTP perdent-ils leur valeur après migration HTTPS ?
Non, à condition que les redirections 301 soient en place. Google suit les 301 et transfère l'autorité des backlinks. En revanche, une chaîne de redirections dilue légèrement le PageRank transmis.
Peut-on revenir en HTTP après une migration HTTPS ratée ?
Techniquement oui, mais c'est une très mauvaise idée. Cela crée une double migration et multiplie les risques de perte. Mieux vaut corriger les erreurs HTTPS plutôt que faire marche arrière.
🏷 Related Topics
HTTPS & Security AI & SEO Redirects

🎥 From the same video 57

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h05 · published on 03/11/2014

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.