What does Google say about SEO? /
Home › Statements › Using native lazy loading or intersection observer

Should you really ditch JavaScript libraries for native lazy loading solutions?

Martin Splitt Feb 25, 2021 ★★★ FR
Should you really ditch JavaScript libraries for native lazy loading solutions?
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 3 questions

Less than 30 seconds. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~30s 🎯 3 questions 📚 SEO Google

Official statement

For lazy loading images, it is recommended to either use the browser's native lazy loading with the 'loading=lazy' attribute, or a solution based on Intersection Observer rather than libraries that can cause issues.
50:43
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 1704h03 💬 EN 📅 25/02/2021 ✂ 15 statements
Watch on YouTube (50:43) →
✂ Other statements from this video 14 ▾
  1. 37:58 Le mobile-first indexing est-il vraiment la seule priorité pour votre SEO ?
  2. 38:59 Pourquoi Google ignore-t-il vos images si elles sont dans data-src au lieu de src ?
  3. 42:16 Le Mobile-Friendly Test affiche-t-il vraiment ce que Google voit de votre page ?
  4. 43:03 Pourquoi vos images invisibles pour Google vous font perdre du trafic qualifié ?
  5. 47:27 Google rend-il vraiment toutes les pages JavaScript sans limitation ?
  6. 48:24 Faut-il encore optimiser JavaScript pour les moteurs de recherche autres que Google ?
  7. 49:06 Faut-il vraiment privilégier le HTML au JavaScript pour le contenu principal ?
  8. 78:06 Action manuelle ou baisse algorithmique : comment identifier ce qui touche vraiment votre site ?
  9. 78:49 Le PageRank fonctionne-t-il toujours comme en 1998 ?
  10. 80:02 Comment échapper au filtre du contenu dupliqué de Google ?
  11. 80:07 Le dynamic rendering est-il vraiment mort pour le SEO ?
  12. 84:54 Pourquoi JavaScript reste-t-il la ressource la plus coûteuse pour le chargement de vos pages ?
  13. 85:17 Faut-il vraiment limiter la longueur des title tags à 60 caractères ?
  14. 86:54 Le JavaScript massacre-t-il vraiment vos Core Web Vitals ?
📅
Official statement from (5 years ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic Is the HTML loading=lazy attribute really enough to prevent indexation issues? Martin Splitt · August 21, 2025 View statement →
TL;DR

Google explicitly recommends using the native `loading=lazy` attribute or Intersection Observer for lazy loading images, rather than third-party JavaScript libraries. These libraries can block rendering or create crawling issues. For SEO, this means auditing existing implementations and migrating to solutions that are detectable by Googlebot. However, some modern libraries can still perform well if configured correctly.

What you need to understand

Why does Google warn against lazy loading libraries?

The main problem with JavaScript libraries for lazy loading lies in their mode of operation. Many rely on scroll events or complex detections that do not always trigger correctly during Googlebot's crawl. The bot does not scroll a page like a human; it simulates an initial viewport and then analyzes the rendered DOM.

As a result: an image configured for lazy loading via a JS library may remain invisible to the crawler if it is not within the initial viewport. Worse still, some libraries block the critical rendering path by injecting heavy JavaScript before essential resources are loaded. Google has said numerous times: anything that delays the First Contentful Paint or LCP is problematic.

What exactly is native lazy loading and Intersection Observer?

Native lazy loading (`loading="lazy"`) is an HTML5 attribute that all modern browsers have understood since 2019-2020. You add it to an `` or `'; }