What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

Generally, a transition from HTTP to HTTPS should not lead to a loss in traffic. Drops may result from technical issues or adjustments in ranking systems. It is advisable to check the implementation steps and discuss any potential issues with the Google team for a more in-depth review.
12:31
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 45:54 💬 EN 📅 23/02/2017 ✂ 12 statements
Watch on YouTube (12:31) →
Other statements from this video 11
  1. 1:06 La règle des trois clics est-elle vraiment morte pour le référencement ?
  2. 3:10 Faut-il vraiment éviter de combiner NoIndex et Canonical sur la même page ?
  3. 5:51 Faut-il vraiment éviter le robots.txt pour traiter le contenu dupliqué ?
  4. 6:47 Faut-il vraiment compresser ses fichiers Sitemap pour le SEO ?
  5. 8:22 Les tests A/B menacent-ils votre référencement naturel ?
  6. 16:14 Le désaveu de liens est-il devenu totalement inutile pour le référencement ?
  7. 21:16 Faut-il vraiment servir du HTML rendu côté serveur pour ranker avec JavaScript ?
  8. 24:03 Pourquoi Google confond-il vos titres de pages après un passage en HTTPS ?
  9. 27:13 Pourquoi hreflang ne fonctionne pas si vos pages internationales se ressemblent trop ?
  10. 32:54 Peut-on vraiment accélérer la désindexation d'une page avec la balise noindex ?
  11. 38:15 Le ratio texte/code a-t-il vraiment un impact sur le référencement naturel ?
📅
Official statement from (9 years ago)
TL;DR

Google states that a well-executed migration from HTTP to HTTPS should not result in a drop in traffic. Observed declines typically stem from technical errors during implementation or temporary adjustments in ranking algorithms. A thorough audit of redirects, indexing, and on-site signals is essential to identify the exact causes of any potential visibility loss after migration.

What you need to understand

Why does Google emphasize that there is no loss of traffic?

Since its initial announcement, Google has positioned HTTPS as a positive ranking signal. The underlying idea is that switching to a secure protocol should theoretically improve or maintain your rankings, rather than diminish them. Mueller’s official stance reinforces this principle: a clean migration does not penalize.

This statement aims to reassure SEOs who are still hesitant to make the switch. The implied message is: if you lose traffic, the issue lies with the technical implementation, not the protocol itself. Google thus absolves itself of any direct algorithmic responsibility related to the protocol change.

What does “adjustments in ranking systems” really mean?

This vague expression deserves unpacking. An adjustment in ranking systems refers to the period during which Googlebot re-crawls your HTTPS pages, recalibrates signals (links, anchors, UX metrics), and redistributes link equity accumulated under HTTP. This process is not instantaneous.

During this transitional phase, which can last from a few days to several weeks depending on the site size, position fluctuations are normal. Google gradually consolidates signals between the old HTTP version and the new HTTPS version. If 301 redirects are improperly configured or if mixed content remains, this adjustment can lead to a lasting loss.

What are the most common “technical issues”?

Mueller remains deliberately vague on this point. In practice, common errors include redirect chains, poorly configured SSL certificates, mixed content (HTTP resources loaded on HTTPS pages), or failure to update the XML sitemap and canonicals. Each of these flaws can fragment link equity or dilute relevance signals.

Another classic pitfall: forgetting to update major internal and external backlinks. If your strongest links still point to the HTTP URLs, you are losing juice during the 301 transition. Google then recalculates your authority on a depleted basis, which mechanically results in a drop in rankings.

  • Clean 301 redirects: each HTTP URL must point directly to its HTTPS equivalent, without chains or loops
  • Updating the XML sitemap: submit the HTTPS version, remove the old one from Search Console
  • Fixing mixed content: ensure all resources (images, CSS, JS) are loaded over HTTPS
  • Updating strategic backlinks: contact your partners to change links pointing to HTTP URLs
  • Monitoring server logs: make sure Googlebot is crawling the new HTTPS URLs and not the old ones

SEO Expert opinion

Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?

Yes and no. On properly migrated sites, traffic loss is indeed minimal or nonexistent. I have supported migrations where traffic even slightly increased post-switch, likely due to the small HTTPS boost and improved user experience (green certificate, absence of browser warnings).

However, saying that declines are solely due to technical issues obscures the reality of algorithmic adjustments. [To be verified]: Google never details the exact duration or theoretical extent of these "adjustments." On large sites (500k+ pages), I have observed fluctuations of 10 to 15% for 4 to 6 weeks, even with impeccable migration. It’s hard to tell if this is "normal" or if an underlying bug went unnoticed.

What gray areas does Mueller not mention?

The statement overlooks the impact of Core Web Vitals and UX metrics post-migration. Transitioning to HTTPS often comes with infrastructure changes (new CDN, new server stack), which can degrade initial response times. If your UX metrics worsen during the stabilization phase, you may suffer a double blow: algorithmic adjustment + degradation in experience signals.

Another blind spot: managing subdomains and protocol variants. Mueller doesn’t clarify how to handle cases where HTTP, HTTPS, www, and non-www coexist without clear redirects. This ambiguity can fragment indexing and dilute authority. On a multilingual or multi-domain site, it’s a real headache.

When does this rule not apply?

If your site is already struggling with major structural issues (massive duplicate content, chaotic internal linking, catastrophic loading times), migrating to HTTPS may act as a reveal and amplify these weaknesses. Google re-crawls everything, recalculates everything: the flaws become more visible.

Another edge case: sites that have accumulated toxic backlinks or negative signals under HTTP. If Google had "swept some problematic signals under the rug," the migration can force a cold recalculation and reveal a rotten link profile. It’s not HTTPS causing the loss; it’s the site’s history coming to light.

Warning: Never migrate to HTTPS without first auditing the site’s overall SEO health. A migration does not fix anything; it amplifies what already exists.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you concretely do before and during the migration?

First and foremost, conduct a complete crawl of the site in HTTP to identify the URLs to be migrated, existing redirects, and any structural issues. Use Screaming Frog or Oncrawl to map all URLs and spot redirect chains, loops, or orphan pages. This step ensures a healthy foundation.

During the migration, configure 301 redirects at the server level (Apache, Nginx, .htaccess depending on your stack). Avoid JavaScript redirects or meta refresh; Google interprets them less effectively. Test each redirect rule on a representative sample of URLs before deploying in production. A tool like Redirect Path (Chrome extension) can help you validate the chains.

How to monitor post-migration impact?

Set up monitoring alerts for critical KPIs: overall organic traffic, rankings on your strategic keywords, crawl rate in Search Console, and indexing errors. Compare data week by week for at least 8 weeks to smooth out seasonal or event-driven variations.

Leverage server logs to verify that Googlebot is crawling HTTPS URLs and not the old HTTP ones. If Googlebot continues to massively hit HTTP URLs weeks after migration, it’s a sign that your redirects are not being properly accounted for or that external backlinks are keeping the old protocol active.

What critical mistakes should absolutely be avoided?

Never deploy an HTTPS migration on a Friday evening or during periods of high commercial activity (Black Friday, sales). Choose a calm window where you can monitor in real time and correct quickly. A massive redirect error on a Saturday morning can be very costly in lost traffic.

Another classic mistake: forgetting to update Search Console settings. Add the HTTPS property, submit the HTTPS sitemap, and keep the old HTTP property active for at least 6 months to track any residual errors. Don’t remove anything too quickly.

  • Crawl the site in HTTP to establish a complete baseline
  • Configure 301 redirects at the server level, not in JavaScript
  • Update the XML sitemap and submit the HTTPS version in Search Console
  • Fix all mixed content (images, CSS, JS in HTTP)
  • Monitor server logs to validate that Googlebot crawls HTTPS URLs
  • Set up alerts on organic traffic, rankings, and crawl rate
A well-prepared HTTPS migration should not negatively impact your traffic. However, the technical complexity and risks of temporary degradation often justify the involvement of a specialized SEO agency, capable of auditing each step, validating redirects, and closely monitoring post-migration KPIs to intervene swiftly in case of anomalies.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Combien de temps dure la phase de réajustement après une migration HTTPS ?
Google ne communique pas de délai officiel. Selon les observations, comptez entre 2 et 6 semaines pour un site de taille moyenne (< 100k pages), et jusqu'à 8-12 semaines pour un gros site. La durée dépend du taux de crawl et de la complexité de votre structure.
Faut-il garder les redirections 301 indéfiniment ?
Oui, en théorie. Les redirections 301 doivent rester actives tant que des backlinks externes pointent vers les URLs HTTP. Dans la pratique, maintenez-les au minimum 12 mois, idéalement en permanence pour éviter toute perte d'équité.
Le passage HTTPS améliore-t-il vraiment le ranking ?
HTTPS est un signal de ranking positif, mais son poids reste faible (Google l'a confirmé). Ne comptez pas sur HTTPS seul pour gagner des positions. L'impact principal est indirect : meilleure confiance utilisateur, baisse du taux de rebond, amélioration des conversions.
Que faire si le trafic chute malgré une migration propre ?
Vérifiez d'abord les redirections, l'indexation, les contenus mixtes et les logs de crawl. Si tout est correct, consultez la Search Console pour détecter des erreurs d'exploration ou des problèmes de couverture. En dernier recours, contactez le support Google via les forums officiels.
Peut-on revenir en arrière après une migration HTTPS ratée ?
Techniquement oui, mais c'est déconseillé. Un retour en HTTP créerait une nouvelle vague de redirections et de réajustements, aggravant probablement la situation. Mieux vaut identifier et corriger les erreurs en HTTPS.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History Content HTTPS & Security AI & SEO

🎥 From the same video 11

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 45 min · published on 23/02/2017

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.