Official statement
Other statements from this video 19 ▾
- 1:06 Do blog backlinks to product pages really convey authority?
- 3:14 Can a blog on a subdomain really pass SEO authority to the main site?
- 10:37 Is it true that a JavaScript migration can ruin your indexing due to cache issues?
- 10:37 Should you consider using Prerender for serving static HTML to Googlebot?
- 14:04 Should you include or exclude Googlebot from your A/B tests without risking a penalty?
- 19:19 Is it really necessary to switch from Blogger to WordPress to boost your SEO?
- 20:30 Do Google’s core updates truly follow a predictable schedule?
- 23:06 Are <p> tags truly important for SEO, or does Google completely ignore them?
- 26:55 Why does Search Console only show partial data for the News section at launch?
- 27:27 Do internal links really play a role in Google ranking?
- 31:07 Are Google’s manual penalties always visible in Search Console?
- 33:45 Does the alt attribute still play a role in web page SEO?
- 35:50 Why does Google show spam in brand search results beyond the first page?
- 38:46 Could your meta tags be hiding from Google without you even knowing?
- 38:46 Is third-party JavaScript slowing down your site: Does Google really hold you accountable for ranking?
- 41:34 Does Google Tag Manager affect your content to the point of impacting your SEO?
- 43:48 Restoring a 404 URL: Does Google Really Wipe All Traces of Its Past Authority?
- 49:38 Are guest posts considered a shady link scheme by Google?
- 53:42 Should you really worry about product duplication with infinite scrolling?
Google completely ignores dofollow backlinks from high Domain Authority sites if those domains are filled with spam. These links provide no SEO benefit — neither positive nor negative in most cases. Using the disavow tool for this type of link is unnecessary: it's better to focus your efforts on acquiring truly qualitative and contextual backlinks.
What you need to understand
Why does Google ignore certain high DA backlinks?
Domain Authority is a proprietary metric developed by third-party tools like Moz or Ahrefs. Google does not utilize these scores in its ranking algorithm. A site can display a DA of 70+ while being massively exploited for link spam — abandoned forums, open blog comments, generic directories.
When Google detects that a domain serves as a link farm or that its outgoing backlinks are predominantly artificial, it devalues or ignores these signals. The engine has fine-tuned its anti-spam filters to the point of automatically neutralizing these links without penalizing the target site. The result: your acquisition efforts produce no measurable effect.
What’s the difference between being ignored and penalized?
An ignored link is simply excluded from the calculation of your backlink profile. Google counts it neither positively nor negatively — as if it doesn’t exist. A penalty, on the other hand, actively impacts your ranking: drops in positions, partial deindexing, or manual filtering.
Mueller specifies that these backlinks generally do not cause penalties. The “generally” leaves room for uncertainty: if your link profile is massively spammy, Google might interpret this as an attempt to manipulate. But in most scenarios, the engine merely ignores them.
Should you still worry about the disavow tool in this case?
The disavow tool was designed to disavow toxic links that could trigger manual or algorithmic action. If Google is already ignoring these links, disavowing them is redundant. You are not adding any extra protection.
This does not mean that disavow is obsolete. It remains relevant for cleaning a profile after a manual penalty or to prevent a proven risk of targeted negative spam. But for links from high DA domains devalued by Google, it’s a waste of time.
- Third-party metrics (DA, PA, DR) do not reflect Google’s perception and can be misleading
- An ignored link counts neither for nor against you — it is transparent to the algorithm
- The disavow tool brings nothing if Google is already automatically filtering these backlinks
- Focus your efforts on acquiring contextual editorial links from truly relevant sources
- Quality matters: a unique link from a relevant niche site is worth more than 100 high DA links without context
SEO Expert opinion
Does this statement align with what is observed in the field?
Absolutely. For years, SEOs have found that campaigns of massive backlinks on generic high DA domains — directories, aggregators, forums — produce no positive movement in the SERPs. Third-party tools show a DA/DR score increase, but the ranking remains flat.
Google has clearly evolved towards a contextual and semantic approach to link building. A backlink has value only if it fits within a coherent editorial environment, with a natural anchor and aligned thematic context. Out-of-context links, even from powerful domains, are mechanically devalued by relevance filters.
What nuances should be added to this claim?
Mueller uses the term “generally” — which leaves a gray area. If your site receives hundreds of spam backlinks in a short time, Google might trigger an alert signal and investigate. In this case, even if the individual links are ignored, the overall pattern can attract a manual review. [To verify]: Google does not publish any numeric data on the threshold that triggers a manual alert.
Another point: a high DA domain can host both legitimate content and spammy sections. A link from a solid editorial page on that domain retains its value, even if other parts of the site are polluted. Google evaluates the backlink at the page level, not just at the overall domain level.
In what cases does this rule not apply?
If you are actively working with PBNs (Private Blog Networks) built on expired high DA domains, you are playing a different game. These networks are designed to mask their artificial nature — and as long as they stay under the radar, they can work. But once detected, Google switches from “ignore” mode to “penalize” mode.
Likewise, a natural editorial link from a high DA site with a real audience and true thematic relevance retains its impact. Mueller's statement specifically targets links acquired without an editorial strategy, on domains polluted by third-party spam. Don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you concretely do if you’ve acquired these backlinks?
First, don’t panic. If your positions are stable and you haven't received any manual penalty notifications in Search Console, these links are probably already neutralized by Google. There's no need to launch an urgent cleanup operation.
Next, audit your backlink profile using a tool like Ahrefs, Majestic, or SEMrush — not to monitor DA, but to identify links from poor editorial contexts: blog comments, site footers, general directories. If these links make up more than 30% of your total, reevaluate your acquisition strategy.
What mistakes should you avoid in the future?
Don’t get tempted by offers for “high DA backlink packages” sold by offshore providers. These services mechanically exploit polluted domains and generate no SEO ROI. You’re paying for hot air.
Avoid over-optimizing your anchors on these links as well. Google easily detects anchor over-optimization patterns (repeated exact match). Even if the links are ignored, the algorithm remembers the suspicious behavior — and might penalize you later if other signals confirm manipulation.
How to build a truly solid backlink profile?
Prioritize editorial acquisition: guest blogging on niche sites, collaborations with industry influencers, creating linkable resources (studies, free tools, infographics). A naturally obtained backlink, with a rich editorial context and varied anchor, is worth infinitely more than a hundred automated links.
Invest in quality content that attracts spontaneous links — the famous “link magnets”. Google increasingly values user behavior signals and thematic authority. Good content generates traffic, engagement, and natural backlinks that reinforce your E-E-A-T.
These optimizations might seem simple in theory, but implementing them requires sharp expertise and regular monitoring. If you lack time or internal resources, hiring a specialized SEO agency can help you structure a lasting link-building strategy that adheres to Google’s guidelines, without wasting months on risky experiments.
- Audit your backlink profile to identify links out of editorial context
- Stop any automated acquisition of high DA backlinks without thematic relevance
- Invest in creating linkable content: studies, tools, industry resources
- Prioritize guest blogging and editorial collaborations with niche sites
- Vary your link anchors and avoid exact match over-optimization
- Monitor your positions and Search Console: no action required if everything is stable
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Dois-je désavouer les backlinks haute DA si Google les ignore déjà ?
Un site avec une Domain Authority élevée garantit-il un bon backlink ?
Ces backlinks peuvent-ils me pénaliser si j'en accumule trop ?
Comment savoir si un backlink est ignoré par Google ?
Quelle stratégie de backlinks privilégier en remplacement ?
🎥 From the same video 19
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 58 min · published on 14/09/2020
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.