Official statement
Pages that do not rely on JavaScript are usually more robust, stable, and faster. Avoid total dependence on JavaScript without a truly valid reason, particularly for traditional e-commerce websites.
Other statements from this video 13 ▾
- □ Is lazy loading truly beneficial for your SEO?
- □ Why should you steer clear of dynamic rendering in SEO?
- □ Why should you prioritize server-side rendering for SEO?
- □ Is it essential to paginate URLs for infinite scrolling?
- □ Does Googlebot Really Crawl Mainly from the USA?
- □ Why does Googlebot disregard personalization and private content?
- □ How is the Core Web Vitals report from Search Console transforming the way we identify slow pages?
- □ Do 100% JavaScript sites really pose a problem for SEO?
- □ Why is the Mobile-Friendly Test considered more reliable than DevTools for SEO?
- □ Does Google's indexing infrastructure really have more time than testing tools?
- □ How is Google's new URL Inspection Tool transforming the way we analyze indexed content?
- □ Do JavaScript frameworks really affect SEO?
- □ Do you really need to optimize JavaScript for SEO on WordPress?
Official statement from
(5 years ago)
⚠ A more recent statement exists on this topic
Should you really stick to the 100KB limit for your robots.txt file?
View statement →
TL;DR
Pages without JavaScript typically outperform their counterparts, providing greater stability and speed. Limit the use of JavaScript, especially for traditional e-commerce sites, unless absolutely necessary.
🎥 From the same video 13
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 09/09/2021
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.