What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

URLs with a session ID parameter take time to disappear from the index after adding a rel=canonical because they are not frequently recrawled. This process can take up to a year.
9:43
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 1h06 💬 EN 📅 24/03/2016 ✂ 20 statements
Watch on YouTube (9:43) →
Other statements from this video 19
  1. 2:17 Comment empêcher les URLs de login de polluer vos sitelinks dans Google ?
  2. 6:49 Pourquoi Google ignore-t-il parfois vos balises canonical ?
  3. 8:46 Les liens vers vos pages AMP sont-ils vraiment comptabilisés vers votre version canonique ?
  4. 10:33 Faut-il vraiment utiliser rel=canonical vers le bureau pour vos pages mobiles séparées ?
  5. 11:59 Hreflang et ciblage géographique : confondez-vous encore langue et région ?
  6. 14:52 Désactiver le géociblage dans Search Console : erreur tactique ou stratégie gagnante ?
  7. 17:38 La personnalisation du contenu selon les données démographiques nuit-elle au crawl Google ?
  8. 22:14 Pourquoi Google met-il jusqu'à un an à traiter toutes les redirections après une migration de domaine ?
  9. 26:31 Faut-il vraiment s'inquiéter des erreurs 'not-followed' dans Search Console ?
  10. 29:30 La balise meta NOODP doit-elle encore être respectée par Google ?
  11. 31:57 Pourquoi Google ignore-t-il des URLs présentes dans votre sitemap XML ?
  12. 43:38 Le support If-Modified-Since est-il vraiment universel sur tous les serveurs ?
  13. 46:53 Faut-il vraiment supprimer le JSON-LD des pages en NOINDEX ?
  14. 55:41 Pourquoi l'indexation des images SVG prend-elle plus de temps que celle des pages Web ?
  15. 62:36 Faut-il vraiment indexer vos pages de recherche interne et de tags ?
  16. 62:57 Rel 'next' et 'prev' : pourquoi Google les ignore-t-il vraiment aujourd'hui ?
  17. 71:08 L'outil de soumission d'URL accélère-t-il vraiment le classement de vos pages ?
  18. 78:26 Faut-il vraiment fusionner vos microsites locaux pour éviter la cannibalisation SEO ?
  19. 83:59 Comment Google traite-t-il vraiment les sites piratés dans ses résultats de recherche ?
📅
Official statement from (10 years ago)
TL;DR

Google confirms that URLs containing a session ID parameter linger in the index for several months, even up to a year, despite the addition of a rel=canonical. The reason is that these URLs are rarely recrawled, slowing their depreciation. Specifically, for a site that has generated thousands of unwanted URLs through user sessions, resolving the issue takes much longer than a simple technical cleanup might suggest.

What you need to understand

Why do session IDs create unwanted URLs?

A session ID is a unique identifier generated by a web server to track a visitor's activity. Historically, some CMS or PHP frameworks injected this parameter directly into the URL (e.g., ?PHPSESSID=abc123). The problem? Each visitor generates a new URL for the same page.

Googlebot crawls these variants and indexes them separately, creating massive duplicate content. An e-commerce site might end up with 10,000 indexed URLs for 500 actual pages. This dilutes crawl budget, fragments PageRank, and confuses relevance signals.

How is the rel=canonical supposed to solve this issue?

The canonical tag signals to Google that a URL is the preferred version of duplicate content. In theory, once the canonical is applied to the URLs with session IDs, Googlebot should quickly recognize that these URLs are duplicates and remove them from the index.

However, John Mueller notes that this process is slow. Very slow. Why? Because Google does not actively recrawl these unwanted URLs. They remain in the index in zombie mode, consuming resources without providing value.

What explains this slow deindexing process?

Google allocates its crawl budget based on the popularity and freshness of URLs. URLs with session IDs, often orphaned (no internal or external links), are never reprioritized for a recrawl. They languish in a low-priority queue.

The mentioned timeframe — up to a year — corresponds to the natural cycle of purging stale URLs from the index. Google does not force an immediate recrawl just because a canonical has been added. It waits for the URL to be naturally revisited, or for its periodic cleaning algorithm to operate.

  • Session IDs generate unique URLs for each visitor, creating explosive duplicate content
  • The rel=canonical does not trigger an immediate recrawl of unwanted URLs
  • Google rarely recrawls orphaned or low-priority URLs
  • Deindexing can take several months to a year depending on the natural purge cycle
  • Blocking session parameters in robots.txt or via Search Console speeds up the process

SEO Expert opinion

Does this statement align with field observations?

Yes, absolutely. We regularly see sites that, after fixing a session ID issue, continue to display unwanted URLs in the SERPs for 6 to 12 months. Even with a clean canonical, even with a perfect XML sitemap. The crawl budget is a real bottleneck, not a marketing abstraction.

What’s surprising is that Google does not offer a mechanism for forced purging in these cases. Search Console allows for temporary URL removals, but that’s a band-aid, not a structural solution. The implicit message? Avoid the problem upstream instead of relying on a quick fix afterward.

What nuances should be added to this statement?

Mueller mentions a timeframe that can go up to a year. This is not a guarantee that all URLs will take a year to clear. Some sites see improvement in 3-4 months, while others can indeed stagnate for 10-12 months. The difference? Overall crawl frequency of the site, its authority, and the number of unwanted URLs generated.

Another point: if URLs with session IDs are still accessible (not a 410, not noindex), Google may continue to crawl them sporadically through external backlinks or bookmarks. In this case, deindexing is even slower. [To verify] if Google prefers a 410 or a canonical + noindex to speed up the process — field reports vary.

What mistakes worsen the deindexing delay?

The first classic mistake: adding a canonical without blocking session parameters in Search Console. Google continues to crawl these URLs as valid pages. Second mistake: leaving the URLs returning 200 OK. A 410 Gone signals a permanent removal, which accelerates the purge.

The third mistake: not cleaning up the internal links. If your site is still generating links to URLs with session IDs (dynamic menus, poorly configured pagination), Googlebot detects them and recrawls them, resetting the cycle. Let’s be honest: many devs think a canonical is enough, but it’s a safety net, not a structural crutch.

Practical impact and recommendations

What concrete steps should you take to speed up deindexing?

First, identify all the unwanted URLs. Use Google Search Console (Coverage report), Screaming Frog with a forced crawl, or a query site:yourwebsite.com inurl:session. Export the complete list. If you have thousands, automate the analysis with a Python script or a tool like Botify.

Next, configure the blocking of parameters in Search Console (Settings > URL Settings). Explicitly block session IDs (e.g., PHPSESSID, sid, jsessionid). Complete with a rule in your robots.txt if necessary: Disallow: /*?*session.

How can you check that your site is no longer generating session IDs in URLs?

Test in private browsing and without cookies. Navigate your site and ensure that the URLs remain clean. Use Chrome DevTools (Network > Cookies) to verify that sessions are managed by cookies only, never by URL parameters.

If your CMS or framework is still injecting session IDs, intervene at the code level. For PHP, ensure that session.use_trans_sid is set to 0 in your php.ini. For Java frameworks, configure session management to be cookie-only.

What mistakes should you avoid during this cleanup phase?

Do not abruptly delete all URLs in bulk via robots.txt without having set the canonical tags first. You risk blocking Googlebot before it can process the canonicalization signals. Allow a delay of 2-3 weeks between setting the canonicals and blocking via robots.txt.

Do not use the temporary removal function in Search Console as a permanent solution. It’s a 6-month cache, not a permanent deindexation. And above all, do not rely solely on a canonical if the URLs remain accessible with a 200 status: it’s like asking Google to respect a guideline while leaving the door wide open.

  • Audit all URLs with session IDs via Search Console or a crawler
  • Block session parameters in Search Console (Settings > URL Settings)
  • Add a Disallow rule in robots.txt for session patterns
  • Verify that session IDs are managed by cookies only (never in the URL)
  • Set clean canonicals on still-indexed unwanted URLs
  • Consider 410 Gone for permanently obsolete URLs
Managing URLs with session IDs is a demanding technical task that requires coordination between development, SEO, and infrastructure. If your site has already generated thousands of unwanted URLs, cleaning and monitoring may take several months. In this context, enlisting a specialized SEO agency may be wise to structure the audit, prioritize actions, and avoid errors that prolong the deindexation period. Personalized support also enables implementing monitoring scripts to detect any reappearance of the problem.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Un rel=canonical suffit-il à désindexer rapidement des URLs avec session ID ?
Non. La canonical indique à Google quelle URL préférer, mais ne déclenche pas un recrawl immédiat des URLs parasites. Google peut mettre plusieurs mois à un an pour purger ces URLs de l'index.
Faut-il bloquer les session IDs dans robots.txt ou via Search Console ?
Les deux, idéalement. Search Console permet de signaler explicitement les paramètres inutiles. Le robots.txt empêche tout nouveau crawl. Pose d'abord les canonicals, puis bloque 2-3 semaines après.
Peut-on forcer la désindexation d'URLs parasites via la Search Console ?
La fonction de suppression temporaire est un cache de 6 mois, pas une désindexation permanente. Elle masque les URLs mais ne résout pas le problème structurel. Privilégie 410 Gone ou noindex + canonical.
Pourquoi Google ne recrawle-t-il pas ces URLs plus rapidement après une canonical ?
Parce qu'elles sont orphelines, sans liens internes ni externes. Elles ont une priorité de crawl quasi nulle. Google attend le cycle naturel de purge ou qu'elles soient revisitées par hasard.
Comment éviter que le problème réapparaisse après nettoyage ?
Configure ton CMS pour gérer les sessions par cookies uniquement (jamais dans l'URL). Pour PHP, désactive session.use_trans_sid. Teste régulièrement en navigation privée pour vérifier que les URLs restent propres.
🏷 Related Topics
Crawl & Indexing JavaScript & Technical SEO Domain Name

🎥 From the same video 19

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h06 · published on 24/03/2016

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.