Official statement
Other statements from this video 19 ▾
- 2:17 Comment empêcher les URLs de login de polluer vos sitelinks dans Google ?
- 6:49 Pourquoi Google ignore-t-il parfois vos balises canonical ?
- 8:46 Les liens vers vos pages AMP sont-ils vraiment comptabilisés vers votre version canonique ?
- 9:43 Pourquoi les URLs avec session ID mettent-elles jusqu'à un an à disparaître de l'index ?
- 10:33 Faut-il vraiment utiliser rel=canonical vers le bureau pour vos pages mobiles séparées ?
- 11:59 Hreflang et ciblage géographique : confondez-vous encore langue et région ?
- 14:52 Désactiver le géociblage dans Search Console : erreur tactique ou stratégie gagnante ?
- 17:38 La personnalisation du contenu selon les données démographiques nuit-elle au crawl Google ?
- 22:14 Pourquoi Google met-il jusqu'à un an à traiter toutes les redirections après une migration de domaine ?
- 26:31 Faut-il vraiment s'inquiéter des erreurs 'not-followed' dans Search Console ?
- 29:30 La balise meta NOODP doit-elle encore être respectée par Google ?
- 31:57 Pourquoi Google ignore-t-il des URLs présentes dans votre sitemap XML ?
- 43:38 Le support If-Modified-Since est-il vraiment universel sur tous les serveurs ?
- 46:53 Faut-il vraiment supprimer le JSON-LD des pages en NOINDEX ?
- 55:41 Pourquoi l'indexation des images SVG prend-elle plus de temps que celle des pages Web ?
- 62:57 Rel 'next' et 'prev' : pourquoi Google les ignore-t-il vraiment aujourd'hui ?
- 71:08 L'outil de soumission d'URL accélère-t-il vraiment le classement de vos pages ?
- 78:26 Faut-il vraiment fusionner vos microsites locaux pour éviter la cannibalisation SEO ?
- 83:59 Comment Google traite-t-il vraiment les sites piratés dans ses résultats de recherche ?
Google states that internal search and tag pages can assist with crawling and indexing, but only if they provide real value. Weak pages should carry a NOINDEX directive to focus crawl budget on relevant content. This means systematically auditing these auto-generated pages and setting strict quality criteria before allowing them to be indexed.
What you need to understand
Why Does Google Specifically Talk About These Auto-Generated Pages?
Internal search pages and tag pages constitute a significant portion of the page volume on many sites. An average e-commerce site easily generates thousands of combinations through its filters, search results, and taxonomies. The issue? These pages often look very similar, provide duplicate content, or have empty listings.
Google here reminds us of an obvious truth that many forget: just because a URL technically exists doesn't mean it deserves to be indexed. The engine has to make choices, and if you serve it a lot of low-quality content, you dilute your potential for ranking on your real strategic pages.
What Does Google Mean by a Page That 'Provides Value'?
The phrasing remains deliberately vague, but we can deduce some practical criteria. A tag or search page provides value if it addresses a real search intent, contains enough relevant results, and isn't redundant with other pages on the site.
For example: a tag page for 'women's running shoes' on a sports site can legitimately exist if it aggregates relevant products and targets a query that users are searching for. On the other hand, a search page generated by the query 'azertyuiop' or a tag 'miscellaneous' that combines three unrelated products has no reason to be crawled.
How Can I Know if My Pages Should Carry a NOINDEX?
You need to audit your auto-generated pages by applying quality filters. The number of displayed results, thematic relevance, the existence of search volume for the target query, and click depth from the homepage are signals to analyze.
Google Search Console becomes your best ally. Identify indexed pages generating zero clicks, zero impressions, or that are marked as crawled but not indexed. These signals indicate that the engine itself finds no value in these URLs. This is where you should place a NOINDEX or a nofollow on the internal links leading to them.
- Internal search pages: block by default unless they target documented strategic queries
- Tag pages: keep only those relevant to searched topics and that aggregate at least 5-10 relevant contents
- E-commerce filter pages: limit indexing to combinations that generate proven organic traffic or that target long-tail keywords with high potential
- GSC Monitoring: track monthly unindexed crawled pages and adjust the NOINDEX strategy accordingly
- XML Sitemap: include only pages you really want indexed, not the entire technical structure
SEO Expert opinion
Does This Statement Align With Observed Practices in the Field?
Yes, absolutely. SEO audits regularly reveal sites with 80% of their index made up of low-value pages. E-commerce sites with thousands of filter combinations, blogs with tags generated for every secondary keyword, and listing sites with indexed saved searches are common examples.
The problem is that this inflation of URLs dilutes the distribution of internal PageRank and wastes crawl budget unnecessarily. Google must prioritize what it crawls. If you serve it 50,000 pages where 45,000 are useless, you mechanically reduce the crawl frequency of your true strategic pages. [To be verified]: Google never communicates a precise threshold, but field observations show that beyond a certain ratio of indexed pages to value pages, the site loses responsiveness to indexing.
What Are the Most Common Mistakes on This Topic?
The first mistake: indexing by default. Many CMS or e-commerce platforms automatically generate tag, search, and filter pages, and make them indexable without any editorial decision being made. The result: Google indexes everything, then gradually demotes the site for low content quality.
The second mistake: thinking that 'more indexed pages = better visibility.' That's false. A site with 500 well-targeted and well-optimized pages will always perform better than a site with 50,000 pages where 90% is noise. The quality of the index is more important than quantity. We regularly see sites double their organic traffic after cleaning their index with massive NOINDEX placements on auto-generated pages.
In What Cases Should Those Pages Still Be Indexed?
If you have a documented long-tail strategy, with search data proving that certain filter combinations or tags are being searched, then yes, index them. But with one condition: enrich them. A tag page for 'technical SEO' shouldn't just list 12 articles; it should include an original introduction, a definition, and relevant internal linking.
Classified ads or content aggregation sites can also benefit from indexing search pages if they target geolocalized or ultra-specific queries. For example, '3-room apartment Paris 11th' generates a search page that can legitimately rank if it contains fresh and relevant listings. But even in this case, you need to monitor the rate of unindexed crawled pages in GSC: if Google refuses to index these pages en masse, it means it finds no value in them.
Practical impact and recommendations
What Should You Do Right Now?
Start with an index audit in Google Search Console. Export the list of indexed pages, cross-reference it with your analytics to identify those generating zero organic traffic in the last 12 months. Then, segment: internal search pages, tag pages, e-commerce filter pages, and other auto-generated pages.
For each segment, define objective quality criteria. Example for tag pages: at least 8 associated contents, at least 10 monthly searches on the target keyword, editorial content of at least 150 words in the introduction. Everything that doesn't meet these criteria should carry a NOINDEX. Automate this logic in your CMS or platform if possible.
How Can You Avoid Breaking What Already Works?
Before applying massive NOINDEX directives, check which pages generate organic traffic. Even if they seem weak, some may be ranking for unexpected long-tail traffic. Use a GSC filter for 'impressions > 100' or 'clicks > 5' over the last 12 months to isolate pages to preserve.
Then, roll out in phases. Start by NOINDEXing pages with zero impressions, zero clicks, and monitor the impact over 4-6 weeks. If overall traffic remains stable or increases, continue. If you observe an unexplained drop, investigate: you may have blocked a page that served as an internal linking hub or that captured untracked long-tail traffic.
What Mistakes Should Be Absolutely Avoided?
Never place a NOINDEX on pages that receive backlinks. Check with Ahrefs, Majestic, or your preferred backlink tool before mass disindexing. A tag page may have weak content but strong authority if it has been naturally linked.
Avoid blocking with robots.txt the pages you want to NOINDEX. Google must be able to crawl the page to read the NOINDEX tag. If you block the URL in robots.txt, the engine will never see the directive and will continue trying to index it. The result: you're wasting crawl budget for nothing.
- Audit the GSC index and segment auto-generated pages
- Define objective quality criteria for each type of page
- Apply a NOINDEX to pages below the defined thresholds
- Check backlinks before disindexing a page
- Never block a page you want to NOINDEX with robots.txt
- Monitor the monthly evolution of indexed pages in GSC
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Dois-je systématiquement bloquer toutes mes pages de recherche interne ?
Combien de pages de tags ou de filtres puis-je indexer sans risque ?
Le NOINDEX suffit-il ou faut-il aussi supprimer les liens internes vers ces pages ?
Combien de temps faut-il pour voir l'impact d'un nettoyage d'index ?
Puis-je utiliser la balise canonical au lieu du NOINDEX sur ces pages ?
🎥 From the same video 19
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h06 · published on 24/03/2016
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.