What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 3 questions

Less than 30 seconds. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~30s 🎯 3 questions 📚 SEO Google

Official statement

Google announced on Twitter a minor change in how video traffic data is displayed in Search Console: "if you're using structured video data, our report is now aligned with official documentation and will warn you if neither embedUrl nor contentUrl is used in a VideoObject"...
📅
Official statement from (5 years ago)

What you need to understand

Google has just adjusted how data is displayed in Search Console regarding video traffic. This modification specifically affects website owners using VideoObject structured data according to the Schema.org schema.

Specifically, Search Console now generates an explicit warning when VideoObject markup contains neither the embedUrl property nor the contentUrl property. This validation aligns with Google's official documentation, which specifies that one of these two properties must be present for a video to be properly indexed and displayed in search results.

Key takeaways:

  • VideoObject requires either embedUrl, contentUrl, or both
  • Search Console now detects this absence and generates a clear warning
  • This validation improves compliance with Google's official documentation
  • The absence of these URLs can prevent rich display of your videos in SERPs
  • This change only affects alert display, not indexing itself

SEO Expert opinion

This Search Console update is consistent with the technical requirements that Google has documented for a long time. In practice, many sites were already correctly using these properties, but this explicit validation enables quick detection of incomplete implementations that might have gone unnoticed.

The positive aspect of this evolution is that it transforms a silent error into an actionable signal. Previously, a VideoObject without a URL might simply not generate a rich result without the webmaster understanding why. Now, the diagnosis is immediate and explicit in Search Console.

Warning: There are special cases where contentUrl and embedUrl can point to different resources. The contentUrl should point to the raw video file (MP4, etc.) while embedUrl points to the embedded player. Google recommends providing both when possible, but technically one of the two is sufficient to avoid the warning. However, prioritize using both properties to maximize your chances of rich display.

Practical impact and recommendations

Summary: Immediately check your existing VideoObject implementations in Search Console. Add missing properties to ensure your videos are eligible for rich results.
  • Immediately audit your Search Console video report to identify warnings
  • Verify that each VideoObject contains at least a contentUrl or an embedUrl
  • Prioritize using both properties simultaneously: contentUrl to the source file and embedUrl to your player
  • For contentUrl, use a direct URL to the video file (MP4, MOV, etc.)
  • For embedUrl, point to the page with integrated player or the embed iframe
  • Test your modifications with Google's Rich Results Test tool
  • Prioritize corrections on video pages generating organic traffic
  • Document your standard implementation for future video publications
  • Monitor performance in Search Console after correction (2-4 week delay)
  • Don't remove other recommended VideoObject properties (thumbnail, description, uploadDate, duration)
Domain Age & History Content AI & SEO Images & Videos Domain Name PDF & Files Social Media Search Console

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.