What does Google say about SEO? /

Official statement

Google has updated its online documentation regarding structured data markup and reminds us that the 3 available formats (JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFa) are "equally accepted by Google, provided they are valid and implemented in accordance with the feature documentation"...
📅
Official statement from (3 years ago)

What you need to understand

Google has just clarified its official position regarding the three structured data formats accepted by its search engine: JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFa. This documentation update specifies that these formats are treated equivalently, with no particular privilege granted to one over another, provided they are valid and correctly implemented.

This statement puts an end to certain speculations that JSON-LD would benefit from preferential treatment in Google's algorithm. The reality is more nuanced: all formats are technically equivalent for crawling and indexing, but JSON-LD remains recommended for purely practical and operational reasons.

Concretely, this means that a site using Microdata or RDFa is not penalized and should not necessarily undertake an expensive migration solely for SEO reasons. The priority should be the validity and consistency of structured data, regardless of the chosen format.

  • All three formats (JSON-LD, Microdata, RDFa) are treated identically by Google
  • No direct SEO advantage is granted to any particular format
  • Data validity and compliance are the priority criteria
  • JSON-LD is recommended for its ease of implementation, not for an SEO gain
  • Existing sites using Microdata or RDFa do not need to migrate urgently

SEO Expert opinion

This official position indeed corresponds to what I've been observing in the field for several years. Well-positioned sites use all three formats interchangeably, and I have never found any correlation between format choice and performance in rich snippets or rankings. What truly matters is the quality and completeness of structured data, not the technical container used.

However, my recommendation remains oriented toward JSON-LD for new projects, for pragmatic reasons: separation of semantic code and HTML, ease of maintenance by technical teams, possibility of dynamic injection via GTM, and above all reduced risk of errors during template updates. E-commerce sites with thousands of product pages particularly benefit from this centralized approach.

Warning: This technical equivalence does not mean you can mix formats on the same page or for the same object. Google may have difficulty reconciling mixed structured data. Choose one format and maintain consistency across the entire site. Additionally, some CMS or plugins automatically generate Microdata: check for duplication if you're manually adding JSON-LD.

Practical impact and recommendations

In summary: No panic if you're using Microdata or RDFa. Focus on the validity and completeness of your structured data rather than the format. For new projects, favor JSON-LD for its maintainability.
  • Do not undertake an urgent migration solely to switch to JSON-LD if your current implementation is working correctly
  • Audit the validity of your existing structured data with Google's Rich Results Test and Schema.org Validator
  • Prioritize fixing validation errors and enriching data before any format considerations
  • Choose JSON-LD for new developments or complete site redesigns to facilitate future maintenance
  • Absolutely avoid mixing multiple formats on the same page (risk of duplication and inconsistency)
  • Check for conflicts between data automatically generated by your CMS and manually added data
  • Document the chosen format in your technical style guide to maintain consistency
  • Regularly test rich snippet display in Search Console to ensure Google correctly interprets your data
  • Train your teams on the selected format to guarantee quality implementations during updates
Structured Data AI & SEO JavaScript & Technical SEO PDF & Files

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.