Official statement
Other statements from this video 28 ▾
- 1:05 Do image redirections to HTML pages pass on PageRank?
- 1:05 Why does redirecting your images to third-party pages destroy their SEO value?
- 2:12 Should you really be concerned about TLDs for an international website?
- 2:37 Can .eu domains really target multiple countries without SEO penalties?
- 4:15 Should you really automate language redirections for your multilingual website?
- 6:35 Why does Googlebot ignore your cookies and how does it affect your multilingual strategy?
- 7:38 Do you really need to host your domain in the target country to rank locally?
- 9:00 Should you avoid multiple H1 tags when your logo is text-based?
- 9:01 Should you really limit the number of H1 tags on a page for SEO?
- 11:28 Do GSC impressions truly reflect what your users see?
- 12:00 What is a real impression in Search Console, and how does the viewport change everything?
- 14:03 Does lazy loading of images really block Googlebot?
- 14:08 Can lazy loading of images hinder their indexing by Google?
- 17:21 Should you really avoid modifying the content of a recent page?
- 19:30 Can bad backlinks really sink your Google ranking?
- 19:47 Does changing your internal link anchors really trigger a Google recrawl?
- 21:34 Can Google really ignore your unnatural backlinks without penalizing you?
- 24:05 Why do partial site migrations lead to longer SEO fluctuations compared to complete migrations?
- 27:00 Does site structure really enhance its indexing?
- 30:41 Why should you choose a 301 over a 307 when migrating to HTTPS?
- 33:35 Why does the 'site:' command take up to two months to reflect your actual changes?
- 34:54 Can the unavailable_after tag really control how long your content remains in Google's index?
- 39:19 Does the 'Unavailable After' tag really allow you to schedule a page's removal from Google's index?
- 50:12 Is it really necessary to reindex the entire site after a URL change?
- 50:34 Should you really avoid changing the structure of your URLs?
- 53:00 Should you retranslate your backlink anchors when changing your site's main language?
- 53:00 Is changing your website's primary language a risk for losing backlinks?
- 54:12 Is the new Search Console really going to change your SEO diagnosis?
Google acknowledges that Googlebot can excessively crawl CSS and JavaScript resources, indicating a potential caching issue on the engine's side. Mueller recommends reporting these situations through Search Console rather than adjusting robots.txt or crawl budget. This statement confirms that Google does not always manage its crawling resources optimally, which can impact server load for websites.
What you need to understand
What causes excessive crawling of CSS/JS?
Googlebot treats CSS and JavaScript resources differently from HTML to construct the full rendering of a page. Unlike HTML, which changes frequently, these files generally remain stable between updates.
The problem arises when Google's caching system does not retain these resources properly. Instead of retrieving them once and reusing them across multiple pages, Googlebot requests them during each crawl session. For a site with 10,000 pages sharing 3 CSS files and 5 JS files, this leads to an unnecessary multiplication of requests by the thousands.
How can you identify abnormal crawling on these files?
Search Console displays the crawl volume by resource type in the crawling statistics report. A warning sign: if your CSS/JS files represent more than 30-40% of the total request volume while accounting for less than 1% of your URLs.
Also, check your server logs. If you notice that Googlebot Desktop and Mobile are downloading the same CSS files every 2-3 hours without version changes, it typically indicates a caching issue on Google’s side.
Why doesn't Google resolve this automatically?
Mueller's statement is revealing: Google asks webmasters to report the problem rather than detecting and correcting it automatically. This suggests that their distributed caching infrastructure faces scenarios where it loses track of resources that have already been crawled.
HTTP cache headers (Cache-Control, ETag, Last-Modified) should theoretically suffice. However, Google operates on a global network of crawlers that do not always perfectly share their state. A data center in Tokyo may recrawl what a data center in California has just retrieved.
- Google's caching is not infallible despite their technical means
- Static resources (CSS/JS) should be crawled 10-20 times less often than HTML
- A clear warning sign: a sudden increase in Googlebot hits on unchanged files
- The official solution involves manual reporting in Search Console, not a technical adjustment on your side
SEO Expert opinion
Is this recommendation consistent with on-the-ground observations?
Yes, and it’s even a valuable confirmation. SEOs monitoring their logs have regularly observed this behavior for years. Google sometimes crawls identical CSS files 50 to 100 times a day on mid-sized sites, without any apparent technical reason.
The novelty here is the official admission that the issue originates on Google's side, not from a misconfiguration on the site. For years, the standard response was to check our cache headers or our CDN. Today, Mueller explicitly acknowledges an internal malfunction.
What limitations does this statement have?
There are two major blind spots. First, no quantitative threshold is provided. At what point of daily requests on the same CSS file should it be considered excessive? 10? 100? 1000? Without metrics, it’s hard to know if your situation warrants a report. [To verify]: Google also doesn’t specify the resolution timeline after reporting.
Secondly, the reporting method remains vague. Mueller mentions “report via Search Console,” but where exactly? The general feedback form? The crawl errors report? This lack of a clear procedure complicates the practical application of the advice.
In what cases does this advice not apply?
If your CSS/JS files actually change frequently (multiple times a day with different version hashes), frequent crawling is normal and desirable. Google needs to track your updates to render your pages correctly.
Another exception: sites with inline CSS/JS in the HTML. There, each page constitutes its own
Practical impact and recommendations
Comment vérifier si votre site est concerné ?
Première étape : analysez vos logs serveur sur les 30 derniers jours. Filtrez les requêtes Googlebot et comptez combien de fois chaque fichier CSS/JS a été téléchargé. Comparez ce chiffre au nombre de pages HTML crawlées.
Ratio sain : 1 téléchargement CSS/JS pour 50-200 pages HTML visitées (selon la fréquence de mise à jour de votre site). Ratio anormal : 1 téléchargement pour moins de 10 pages. Dans la Search Console, le rapport Statistiques sur l'exploration affiche la répartition par type de fichier, mais sans le détail fichier par fichier que seuls vos logs fournissent.
Que faire concrètement si vous détectez un crawl excessif ?
Avant de signaler à Google, vérifiez votre configuration technique. Headers Cache-Control sur vos CSS/JS : visez "max-age=31536000" avec un système de versioning (style.css?v=1.2.3). Headers ETag présents et cohérents. Si tout est correct de votre côté et que le crawl reste anormal pendant 2+ semaines, préparez un signalement structuré.
Documentez : captures d'écran du rapport Search Console, extraits de logs montrant la fréquence, liste des fichiers concernés avec leurs URLs complètes. Soumettez via le formulaire de feedback de la Search Console (icône en haut à droite de l'interface) en étant précis et factuel. Évitez les généralités du type "Googlebot crawle trop", donnez des chiffres.
Quelles erreurs éviter dans la gestion de ce problème ?
Ne réduisez pas artificiellement la fréquence de crawl dans la Search Console pour compenser. Cet outil ralentit tout le crawl, y compris vos nouvelles pages HTML qui ont besoin d'être découvertes rapidement. Vous traiteriez le symptôme en créant un problème d'indexation plus grave.
Ne bloquez jamais CSS/JS dans robots.txt comme "solution". Google l'a répété cent fois : cela empêche le rendu correct et peut dégrader votre positionnement. Le crawl excessif est un bug de leur infrastructure de cache, pas une raison légitime de bloquer l'accès aux ressources de rendu.
- Analyser les logs serveur sur 30 jours pour quantifier le ratio crawl CSS/JS vs HTML
- Vérifier que vos headers de cache sont optimaux (Cache-Control, ETag, versioning)
- Documenter le problème avec captures d'écran et données chiffrées avant signalement
- Utiliser le formulaire de feedback Search Console, pas les forums publics
- Ne jamais bloquer CSS/JS dans robots.txt pour "économiser" du crawl
- Monitorer l'évolution post-signalement pendant 4-6 semaines
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
À partir de combien de crawls par jour sur un fichier CSS dois-je considérer que c'est excessif ?
Ce problème de cache Google peut-il impacter mon positionnement ?
Dois-je réduire la fréquence de crawl dans Search Console pour limiter le problème ?
Les headers Cache-Control de mes CSS/JS sont-ils vraiment pris en compte par Googlebot ?
Comment savoir si Google a résolu le problème après mon signalement ?
🎥 From the same video 28
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 57 min · published on 07/09/2017
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.