What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 3 questions

Less than 30 seconds. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~30s 🎯 3 questions 📚 SEO Google

Official statement

Google strongly recommends using redirects when redesigning a site to indicate the new pages that correspond to the old ones. This allows for the correct transfer of SEO signals to the new URLs.
2:35
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 8:02 💬 EN 📅 31/03/2020 ✂ 12 statements
Watch on YouTube (2:35) →
Other statements from this video 11
  1. 3:07 Comment Google identifie-t-il vraiment les pages dupliquées dans votre site ?
  2. 3:35 Pourquoi les redirections sont-elles critiques lors d'une refonte de site ?
  3. 3:50 Faut-il vraiment renvoyer un code 500 plutôt qu'un 200 pour une page d'erreur ?
  4. 4:10 Les balises rel=canonical sont-elles vraiment un signal fiable pour contrôler le clustering ?
  5. 4:46 Le rel=canonical est-il vraiment indispensable pour éviter les erreurs d'indexation ?
  6. 5:14 Le contenu localisé peut-il être considéré comme du duplicate content par Google ?
  7. 5:25 Hreflang peut-il vraiment empêcher Google de dédupliquer vos pages localisées ?
  8. 5:50 Comment Google choisit-il vraiment l'URL représentative à indexer ?
  9. 6:19 Comment Google choisit-il l'URL canonique dans un cluster de pages similaires ?
  10. 8:02 Pourquoi vos signaux canoniques contradictoires sabotent-ils votre indexation ?
  11. 8:02 Que se passe-t-il quand vos signaux canoniques se contredisent ?
📅
Official statement from (6 years ago)
TL;DR

Google insists: during a redesign, redirects are crucial for transferring SEO signals from old URLs to new ones. Without them, you risk losing the authority, rankings, and organic traffic you've built up. Specifically, every old URL that was receiving SEO juice must point to its new version through a 301 redirect — this is the only way to preserve your link equity and history.

What you need to understand

What happens technically when you migrate without redirects?

When you change your site's structure without implementing 301 redirects, Google encounters URLs that return 404 errors. These dead pages immediately lose their ability to rank. The SEO signals — particularly the PageRank conveyed by backlinks — find no destination and vanish.

The bot crawls the old structure, sees that the pages no longer exist, and eventually de-indexes them. Meanwhile, your new URLs start from scratch: no history, no inherited authority, no trust signals. The result? A dramatic drop in traffic that can last for months while Google rebuilds all the lost signals.

Why has Google been hammering this advice for years?

Because it's one of the most costly mistakes a site can make. A redesign without a redirect plan is like moving without leaving a forwarding address. All your clients — here, the engines and the visitors — are faced with a closed door.

Google has observed thousands of failed migrations where organic traffic collapses by 50 to 80% simply because no one took the time to properly map the old URLs to the new ones. The recommendation is not technical for fun: it is vital to preserve continuity in your visibility.

What does it mean to “correctly transfer SEO signals”?

SEO signals are all the criteria that Google has accumulated about your pages over time: backlink authority, content age, user behavior, topical relevance, and click history in the SERPs. A permanent 301 redirect tells Google that the page has moved permanently.

In this case, Google transfers nearly all of these signals to the new URL. It is often said to be a 90-95% transfer — never 100%, but enough to avoid catastrophic loss. Without this redirect, you start from scratch as if your site was just born.

  • 301 Redirects: essential for a lasting transfer of PageRank and authority
  • Complete URL Mapping: every old URL must point to its relevant equivalent, not to the default homepage
  • Pre-Migration Testing: validate the redirect plan in a staging environment before going live
  • Post-Migration Monitoring: watch for 404s, redirect loops, and traffic progression in the following weeks
  • Consolidation Delay: Google may take several weeks to recrawl all redirects and stabilize rankings

SEO Expert opinion

Is this recommendation really followed in practice?

Let’s be honest: it should be, but it's not always. I’ve seen agencies roll out redesigns in production without even having exported the list of indexed URLs. The result: hundreds of 404s showing up in the Search Console, traffic plunging by 40% in three weeks, and a management team in panic.

The problem is that properly mapping thousands of URLs takes time and rigor. You need to analyze the old structure, identify pages receiving traffic or backlinks, and then determine page by page where to redirect them. Many projects overlook this step due to a lack of resources or haste — and they pay the price in visibility.

Do all types of redirects transfer signals the same way?

No. The 301 (permanent) is the one Google prefers for migrations, as it indicates a permanent move. It transfers nearly all signals. The 302 (temporary), on the other hand, implies that the old page might come back, so Google maintains the signals on the old URL and doesn't fully transfer them.

In theory, Google today treats 302 and 307 similarly to 301 if they remain in place for a long time — but in practice, it's best not to play with fire. A mistakenly used 302 can slow down signal consolidation and create confusion in the indexes. Use a 301 for any definitive migration, period.

What are the most common mistakes in redirect plans?

The most frequent mistake: redirecting all old URLs to the homepage. It’s quick to implement but catastrophic for UX and SEO. Google sees thousands of pages pointing to a single destination and understands that the match isn’t relevant. The result: signal transfer is partial or even nullified.

Another classic mistake: redirect chains. For example, URL1 → URL2 → URL3. Google follows these chains, but each hop dilutes signals and slows the crawl. Always redirect directly from old to new, without intermediate steps. Finally, forgetting to redirect variations (www, http, trailing slash) creates duplicates and losses of juice.

[To check]: Google does not publish official figures on the exact rate of signal transfer via 301. Estimates vary between 85 and 99% depending on the sources, but no one outside of Google can prove it with certainty.

Warning: A poorly managed migration can destroy years of SEO work in a matter of days. Before launching, test your redirect plan in staging, check the HTTP codes, and keep an eye on the Search Console for at least two months post-migration.

Practical impact and recommendations

How to build a solid redirect plan before redesigning?

First reflex: export the complete list of indexed URLs from the Search Console or through a Screaming Frog / Sitebulb crawl. Isolate the pages that receive organic traffic (Analytics) and those with backlinks (Ahrefs, Majestic). These are your absolute priorities — they must be redirected to relevant equivalents, never to the homepage.

Then, create a URL mapping table: old URL → new URL. Manually verify matches for strategic pages. If an old page no longer has an exact equivalent, redirect to the parent category or the thematically closest page. The aim is to preserve relevance in the eyes of Google and visitors.

What technical mistakes must be absolutely avoided?

Never redirect a URL to itself — it creates a redirect loop that blocks crawling. Also avoid chains: if you restructure multiple times, ensure each redirect points directly to the final destination, without intermediate steps. A post-migration audit should check that no chain exceeds one hop.

Test HTTP codes before going live. A 302 instead of a 301 can go unnoticed for weeks and delay signal transfer. Use tools like Redirect Path (Chrome extension) or a staging server to manually check each redirect before switching.

What if the migration is already live and redirects were forgotten?

Don't panic, but act quickly. Immediately identify URLs generating 404s in the Search Console. Prioritize those that had traffic or backlinks. Urgently deploy missing redirects — every day without a redirect is SEO juice going up in smoke.

Monitor the evolution of organic traffic and rankings in the following weeks. If certain pages don’t recover despite redirects, it may be that they’re pointing to an irrelevant destination. Adjust the mapping if necessary. Google may take 4 to 8 weeks to recrawl everything and stabilize rankings.

  • Export all indexed URLs and identify those with traffic or backlinks
  • Create a 1:1 mapping table between old and new URLs
  • Redirect to relevant destinations, never to the default homepage
  • Use exclusively 301 redirects for definitive migrations
  • Test redirects in staging before going live
  • Check for chains, loops, or 404s after deployment
A redesign without a rigorous redirect plan is SEO suicide. Signal transfer doesn't happen by magic: it relies on precise correspondence between old and new URLs, validated technically and tested before the switch. If this step seems cumbersome or risky to manage alone, hiring a specialized SEO agency can prevent costly mistakes and ensure a smooth transition without traffic loss.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Quelle différence entre une redirection 301 et une 302 lors d'une refonte ?
La 301 indique un déménagement permanent et transfère la quasi-totalité des signaux SEO vers la nouvelle URL. La 302 signale un déplacement temporaire, donc Google conserve les signaux sur l'ancienne page. Pour une refonte définitive, utilise toujours une 301.
Combien de temps Google met-il à prendre en compte les redirections après une migration ?
Le délai varie selon la fréquence de crawl de ton site. Généralement, Google commence à suivre les redirections sous quelques jours, mais la consolidation complète des signaux peut prendre 4 à 8 semaines. Les sites à forte autorité sont recrawlés plus vite.
Peut-on rediriger plusieurs anciennes URLs vers une seule nouvelle page ?
Techniquement oui, mais c'est rarement une bonne idée. Google détecte que la correspondance n'est pas pertinente et peut ne pas transférer tous les signaux. Privilégie toujours un mapping 1:1 ou vers la catégorie parente la plus proche thématiquement.
Que se passe-t-il si on supprime les redirections quelques mois après la migration ?
Google a déjà consolidé les signaux sur les nouvelles URLs, mais les backlinks pointent toujours vers les anciennes. Supprimer les redirections crée des 404 et perd définitivement le jus SEO de ces liens. Garde les redirections actives au moins un an, idéalement indéfiniment.
Faut-il rediriger les URLs qui n'ont jamais eu de trafic ni de backlinks ?
Oui, par souci de cohérence et pour éviter les 404 dans la Search Console. Même sans trafic, une page peut avoir été crawlée et indexée. Redirige-la vers la catégorie parente ou une page thématiquement proche pour préserver l'expérience utilisateur et le crawl budget.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History Domain Name Redirects

🎥 From the same video 11

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 8 min · published on 31/03/2020

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.