Official statement
Other statements from this video 9 ▾
- 0:40 Les balises d'ancre influencent-elles vraiment vos positions dans Google ?
- 3:39 La qualité du contenu peut-elle compenser un maillage interne faible ?
- 5:53 Combien de temps faut-il vraiment pour que Google prenne en compte vos modifications de contenu ?
- 6:23 Faut-il vraiment corriger les pages de faible qualité plutôt que les désindexer ?
- 10:58 La pertinence du contenu suffit-elle vraiment à garantir un bon classement SEO ?
- 11:36 Le contenu dupliqué conduit-il vraiment à une pénalité Google ?
- 16:32 Le hreflang transfère-t-il vraiment du jus SEO entre vos pages internationales ?
- 19:52 La vitesse de chargement affecte-t-elle vraiment le classement Google ?
- 38:34 Les URLs multiples avec canonical correcte pénalisent-elles vraiment le ranking ?
Google states that last modified dates (lastmod) in sitemaps are optional and removing them does not affect crawling. The search engine relies on other signals to assess content freshness. Essentially, this means you can lighten your sitemaps without fearing a penalty, but the actual usefulness of these dates remains debatable.
What you need to understand
What exactly does Google say about last modified dates?
Google clarifies that the lastmod tag in XML sitemaps is optional. This statement puts an end to a near-religious practice among some SEOs: systematically filling this tag under the impression that it speeds up crawling or improves ranking. The search engine explains that it has more reliable internal signals to determine if a page has changed.
Specifically, Google uses its own detection mechanisms: comparing content between two crawls, analyzing HTTP timestamps, monitoring changes in source code. The lastmod tag is just one signal among others, and evidently not the most decisive.
Why this clarification now?
This clarification comes as many sites generate large sitemaps with incorrect or misleading lastmod dates. Some CMSs update this date at each sitemap regeneration, even without actual content modification. Others populate it with today's date for all pages, creating unnecessary noise.
Google seems to want to simplify things: if you cannot guarantee the accuracy of your lastmod dates, it’s better to omit them. The search engine prefers a clean and minimalist sitemap over a file polluted with unusable metadata.
What other freshness signals does Google use?
Google does not outline all of its signals, but several well-known mechanisms can be identified. The HTTP Last-Modified header sent by the server during crawling is a reliable technical indicator. The engine also compares the content hash between two crawls to detect actual changes.
Behavioral signals also play a part: a page that suddenly generates more clicks in the SERPs, recent backlinks, or mentions on social media can indicate a potential update. Google also monitors publication patterns: a news site will be crawled more frequently than a static site.
- Lastmod dates in sitemaps are not mandatory and their absence does not penalize crawling
- Google prioritizes its own signals: HTTP headers, content comparison, user behavior
- Incorrect lastmod dates cause more harm than good: it's better to omit them if they are unreliable
- Content freshness remains a ranking factor, but it is assessed independently from the sitemap
- Simplifying your sitemaps can reduce their size and speed up processing by Googlebot
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with real-world observations?
Yes, and it's even refreshing. Experienced SEOs have long known that Google does not blindly rely on lastmod tags. Too many sites fill them with fantasy values: future dates, zero Unix timestamps, or worse, identical dates for all pages. The engine has undoubtedly developed some immunity to this noise.
In practice, sites are often observed that have frequent crawling despite the absence of lastmod, and conversely, sites with up-to-date lastmod dates that stagnate in the crawl queue. The real trigger remains the combination of internal PageRank, actual update frequency, and demand signals (CTR, backlinks).
What nuances should be added to this statement?
Google says that the absence of lastmod "will not affect" crawling, but [To be verified] this does not mean that this tag is completely ignored. On massive sites with millions of pages, a reliable lastmod can help Googlebot prioritize its resources. If you publish 500 articles a day, accurately indicating new content via lastmod is still relevant.
The nuance also depends on the type of content. For a news site or an e-commerce platform with fluctuating stock, freshness is critical. Google will use all available signals, including lastmod if it is coherent. For a largely static corporate site, this tag provides no added value.
In what cases might this rule not fully apply?
Be careful with news sitemaps: there, timestamps are essential because Google News operates with strict time frames. An article without publication metadata risks being ignored or misclassified chronologically. This specific use case does not follow the general rule.
Another context: sites with a limited crawl budget. If Googlebot can only crawl 10% of your pages per month, providing hints via lastmod can help target the pages that have actually been modified. But your dates must be accurate, which brings us back to the initial problem.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you do with your current sitemaps?
Start by auditing the reliability of your lastmod dates. Compare them to the actual modification dates in your CMS or database. If you notice significant inconsistencies (future dates, uniform timestamps, update with each rebuild), completely remove this tag from your sitemaps.
For sites with a robust content management system that truly tracks modifications, keep the lastmod dates. They do no harm and can serve as a weak complementary signal. Just ensure they reflect substantial content changes, not just a tweak of a comma or a footer change.
How can you ensure Google still detects your updates?
Focus on the signals that Google truly values. Properly configure the HTTP Last-Modified and ETag headers on your server. These metadata are sent with every Googlebot request and are a reliable technical indicator, independent of the sitemap.
Also work on your visible update strategy: add a "Last updated" section in your articles, repost updated content on your social networks, create internal links from fresh pages to those you just modified. Google primarily crawls active pages in its link graph.
What mistakes to avoid when removing lastmod dates?
Do not abruptly remove lastmod if you have no other freshness signals in place. First, check that your HTTP headers are configured, that your internal linking is healthy, and that your updated pages generate traffic or backlinks. Removing lastmod from a site that is already poorly crawled can worsen the situation.
Another trap: confusing lastmod and publication date. If you display a visible publication date for users (via schema.org datePublished), this remains essential for ranking and SERP. Don't touch it. Here we are only discussing the technical lastmod tag in the XML sitemap.
- Audit your current sitemaps to verify the consistency of lastmod dates
- Configure the HTTP Last-Modified and ETag headers on your server
- Maintain schema.org datePublished and dateModified in your pages
- Monitor your crawl logs after any sitemap changes
- Test the submission of your cleaned sitemap via Search Console
- Document changes to audit the impact later
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Si je supprime les dates lastmod, Google va-t-il crawler mes pages moins souvent ?
Dois-je garder lastmod pour mes sitemaps d'images ou de vidéos ?
Les dates lastmod influencent-elles le ranking dans les résultats de recherche ?
Que se passe-t-il si je laisse des dates lastmod incorrectes dans mes sitemaps ?
Faut-il soumettre un nouveau sitemap dans Search Console après suppression des lastmod ?
🎥 From the same video 9
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 54 min · published on 29/09/2016
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.