Official statement
Other statements from this video 10 ▾
- 1:38 Faut-il vraiment passer par un 302 avant un 301 lors d'une migration HTTPS ?
- 4:18 Les mots-clés dans les URL sont-ils vraiment un facteur de ranking négligeable ?
- 7:11 Pourquoi Googlebot continue-t-il de crawler vos pages noindex et comment l'arrêter ?
- 9:04 Faut-il vraiment rediriger en 302 les marques sans produits ou opter pour une 404 ?
- 10:05 Panda réévalue-t-il vraiment le contenu en continu ou faut-il attendre une mise à jour ?
- 11:46 Les outils interactifs peuvent-ils vraiment booster le classement de votre site ?
- 14:43 Faut-il modifier vos annotations mobiles avant le passage à l'index mobile-first ?
- 16:04 Les liens internes "lire plus" nuisent-ils vraiment à l'expérience utilisateur ?
- 22:54 Faut-il canoniser la première page ou la vue complète pour la pagination e-commerce ?
- 46:45 Les publicités au-dessus du pli nuisent-elles vraiment au référencement ?
Google states that an HTTPS migration alongside a URL structure change forces the search engine to completely relearn the site as if it were new. This can cause unpredictable traffic fluctuations and justifies planning the operation during a low-traffic period. The implication for SEOs: absolutely avoid combining these two changes unless you are prepared to temporarily lose a significant portion of your visibility.
What you need to understand
What does Google mean by 'relearning what the site is'?
When Mueller talks about 'relearning', he refers to the complete process of recrawling, reindexing, and reevaluating signals. By simultaneously changing the protocol (HTTP to HTTPS) and the URL structure (for example, from /category/product/ to /p/product-123/), you invalidate all the historical signals accumulated by Google in one go.
The search engine must then rebuild your site's map, reallocate link authority, recalculate quality metrics, and relearn user behavior patterns. This transition phase generates algorithmic uncertainty that Google compensates for with increased caution in ranking.
Why is this double migration more problematic than a simple HTTPS migration?
A simple HTTPS migration keeps the same URL structure: /article/seo-2023/ simply becomes https://… instead of http://… The 1:1 match makes managing 301 redirects easier and allows Google to quickly transfer historical signals.
Add a structure change, and you create a double break. Google must not only validate that your new SSL certificate is legitimate, but also understand that /article/seo-2023/ now corresponds to /blog/2023/seo/. This ambiguity multiplies the risks of crawl errors, misinterpreted redirects, and temporary dilution of PageRank.
What does it mean to 'choose a low-traffic period'?
Google recommends planning this operation when your revenue does not critically depend on organic traffic. For e-commerce, avoid November-December (Black Friday, Christmas). For a B2B site, steer clear of September-October (back to school).
This migration window should also consider your operational capacity to respond. If your technical team is small in August, it’s not the right time to initiate a major overhaul that may require urgent adjustments to redirects or the sitemap file.
- Complete relearning: Google treats your site as partially new, invalidating some of the historical signals accumulated
- Double technical break: Both protocol and structure change simultaneously, complicating redirect tracking and authority transfer
- Strategic planning: Migration should be scheduled during a period when a temporary drop in organic traffic does not impact your critical business objectives
- Stabilization period: Expect several weeks to several months before Google fully reassigns authority and stabilizes your rankings
SEO Expert opinion
Does this recommendation really reflect what is observed on the ground?
Yes, but with a huge variation depending on the size of the site. For well-structured sites with fewer than 1,000 pages, stabilization can occur in 3-4 weeks if redirects are perfect and crawl budget is respected. On sites with 100,000+ pages and complex architecture, I have seen traffic drops persist for 6 to 8 months.
The real issue is that Mueller provides no quantification. [To be verified] No data on the average amplitude of fluctuations, no benchmarks on stabilization duration. Google remains deliberately vague, which forces SEOs to rely solely on their ground experience to estimate the risk.
Should you really avoid combining HTTPS and URL structure change?
Ideally, yes. Separating the two migrations allows you to control the variables: if traffic drops after the standalone HTTPS migration, you know the issue comes from the protocol or the redirects, not the new architecture. But in practice, this approach doubles project time and requires twice the technical resources.
Many companies do not have the luxury of two migration windows spaced 6 months apart. If you must combine, invest heavily in the quality of redirects: comprehensive mapping file, automated tests, real-time monitoring of 404s, daily tracking of key positions. The goal is not to completely avoid fluctuations, but to limit them to 15-25% instead of 40-60%.
Which sites can afford to ignore this recommendation?
Sites with a very low SEO dependency: mobile applications primarily acquired through paid or viral means, B2B platforms where 80% of traffic comes from direct links, niche sites with a loyal community arriving through bookmarks. If SEO represents less than 20% of your overall traffic, the business risk is limited.
Also, sites that have the means to offset with paid during the transition period. If you can increase your Google Ads budget by 30-40% for 2-3 months to maintain acquisition volume, you partially neutralize the impact of the organic drop. But this option is only viable for companies with comfortable margins and high LTV.
Practical impact and recommendations
How can you practically plan a migration combining HTTPS and structure change?
First, establish a comprehensive URL mapping file: each old URL (HTTP, old structure) must point to its new URL (HTTPS, new structure) via a permanent 301 redirect. Test this mapping on a staging environment before deploying it in production. Automate tests with scripts that check that each redirect returns a 301 code and not a chain of redirects.
Next, schedule: identify your lowest traffic period over the last 12 months via Google Analytics. For most sites, it's January-February or July-August. Block 4 weeks during this window: 1 week for final preparation, 1 week for migration, 2 weeks for intensive post-migration monitoring. Inform your marketing teams that organic traffic will be volatile during this period.
What critical mistakes should be absolutely avoided?
Never launch an HTTPS + URL structure migration without having tested the SSL certificate in staging. A misconfigured certificate (missing domains, incomplete chain of trust) generates browser errors that drive users away and send negative signals to Google. Also ensure that your CDN or server does not break redirects by adding conflicting headers.
Another trap: forgetting to update the sitemap XML and robots.txt. Your new sitemap must exclusively list the new HTTPS URLs with the new structure. The old HTTP sitemap should be deleted or redirected to the new one. In robots.txt, check that you are not accidentally blocking Googlebot on critical sections of the new site. A misconfigured robots.txt can delay crawling by several weeks.
How to monitor that the migration is going smoothly?
Install daily monitoring of key metrics: positions on your 50 strategic keywords (via Semrush, Ahrefs, or Search Console), crawl rate in server logs, volume of 404s in Search Console, indexing of new URLs via the site: command in Google. Set up automatic alerts if organic traffic drops by more than 20% in a day.
Also monitor Core Web Vitals in Search Console and PageSpeed Insights: switching to HTTPS can slow down the site if your server is not optimized for the protocol. An LCP jumping from 1.8s to 3.2s due to a poor SSL configuration can worsen the traffic drop related to structural migration. Correct any signals of performance degradation immediately.
- Create a complete URL mapping file and test it in staging before going live
- Identify the lowest traffic period over 12 months and block 4 weeks for migration
- Configure and test the SSL certificate on all affected subdomains before deployment
- Update sitemap.xml, robots.txt, and all technical annotations (canonical, hreflang, etc.)
- Set up daily monitoring of positions, crawl rates, 404s, and Core Web Vitals
- Prepare a contingency paid media budget to offset a potential temporary organic drop
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Combien de temps faut-il pour que Google stabilise les positions après une double migration HTTPS + structure d'URL ?
Peut-on migrer en HTTPS d'abord, puis changer la structure d'URL 6 mois plus tard ?
Les redirections 301 suffisent-elles à transférer 100% de l'autorité des anciennes URL ?
Faut-il conserver les anciennes URL HTTP actives avec des redirections permanentes ?
Comment savoir si Google a bien pris en compte la nouvelle structure d'URL ?
🎥 From the same video 10
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 57 min · published on 01/11/2016
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.