What does Google say about SEO? /

Official statement

In an exchange with a user on Bluesky, John Mueller clarified his position on using the address change tool in Search Console during a non-standard migration. When asked whether the address change tool can be used when a few old URLs are still receiving traffic, John Mueller initially responded favorably.
But what if it involves moving the homepage to the new domain while deliberately leaving product and category pages on the old domain? Faced with this specific scenario, John Mueller adopted a completely different stance. He warned that Google would not consider this a genuine site change. In other words: Google's systems expect a binary "before/after" change, not a modular architecture where the site splits its existence between two different domains.
📅
Official statement from (4 months ago)

What you need to understand

Google clarifies its position on partial site migrations, a practice that may seem appealing but can have disastrous consequences. The address change tool in Search Console is designed for a specific scenario: the complete transfer of a site from domain A to domain B.

The case mentioned illustrates an atypical migration: moving only the homepage to a new domain while keeping product and category pages on the old domain. This hybrid architecture poses a fundamental problem for Google's algorithms.

Google expects a binary migration, a clear-cut switch between two states. Migration processing systems are not designed to understand a modular distribution of content across multiple domains. This approach would create confusion in indexing and the transmission of SEO signals.

  • The address change tool only works for complete site migrations
  • Partial migrations are not recognized as genuine site changes by Google
  • A split architecture between two domains disrupts algorithmic understanding of the site
  • 301 redirects must cover the entire site for optimal PageRank transmission
  • Maintaining traffic on a few old URLs is tolerated, but a dual architecture is not

SEO Expert opinion

This clarification from Mueller is perfectly consistent with what we've observed for years regarding successful migrations versus those that fail. Cases of partial migrations I've audited consistently show visibility loss, authority dilution, and contradictory signals sent to Google.

The important nuance concerns progressive migrations by sections. There's a difference between progressively migrating entire sections (the blog today, products tomorrow) with clean 301 redirects, and deliberately maintaining a fragmented architecture across two domains. The first approach can work if it's temporary and well-managed.

Be careful with special cases: Some multi-brand or international sites may legitimately operate on multiple domains. But in these cases, each domain must be considered a distinct site with its own identity, not fragments of a single fragmented site. The difference is fundamental for Google.

The common mistake is to underestimate the technical complexity of migrations. Many think they can optimize their strategy by keeping "the best of both worlds," but Google favors architectural clarity. One site, one domain, one coherent structure.

Practical impact and recommendations

  • Always plan a complete migration: if you're changing domains, plan to migrate the entire site, not just certain sections
  • Use the address change tool only for total migrations: wait until 95-100% of content is migrated before activating this tool
  • Implement comprehensive 301 redirects: every URL from the old site must point to its counterpart on the new domain
  • Avoid permanent hybrid architectures: don't deliberately maintain important content on the old domain after migration
  • If migration must be progressive, proceed by complete functional blocks (e.g., entire blog, then entire shop) with a tight timeline
  • Document your migration plan before starting: identify all URLs, all content types, and establish complete mapping
  • Monitor key post-migration metrics: organic traffic, indexing, crawl budget, rankings on strategic queries
  • Maintain 301 redirects for at least 12 months: Google needs time to consolidate all signals on the new domain
In summary: Google expects a clear and complete migration from one domain to another. Any attempt to fragment a site across multiple domains will be misinterpreted by the algorithms and compromise your visibility. Site migration remains one of the riskiest SEO operations, requiring deep technical expertise and meticulous planning. Given the complexity of these issues and the financial risks associated with a poorly executed migration, support from a specialized SEO agency can prove decisive in securing your investment and guaranteeing the preservation of your SEO capital.
Domain Age & History Content E-commerce AI & SEO JavaScript & Technical SEO Domain Name Pagination & Structure Redirects Social Media Search Console

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.