Official statement
Other statements from this video 49 ▾
- 1:38 Does Google really track HTML links that are hidden by JavaScript?
- 1:46 Can JavaScript really hide your links from Google without destroying them?
- 3:43 Is it really necessary to optimize the first link on a page for SEO?
- 3:43 Does Google really combine signals from multiple links pointing to the same page?
- 5:20 Do site-wide links in the menu and footer really dilute the PageRank of your strategic pages?
- 6:22 Is it really necessary to nofollow site-wide links to your legal pages to optimize PageRank?
- 7:24 Should you really keep nofollow on your footer links and service pages?
- 10:10 Why does Google make it impossible to use Search Console Insights without Analytics?
- 11:08 Does Nofollow still affect crawling without passing on PageRank?
- 11:08 Does nofollow really block indexing, or can Google still crawl those URLs?
- 13:50 Why is Google so tight-lipped about its indexing incidents?
- 15:58 Should you really index all paged pages to optimize your SEO?
- 19:53 Are URL parameters still an obstacle for organic search?
- 19:53 Are URL parameters really a non-issue for SEO anymore?
- 21:50 Is it true that Google is blocking the indexing of new sites?
- 23:56 Do links in embedded tweets really affect your SEO?
- 25:33 Are sitemaps really essential for Google indexing?
- 26:03 How does Google really discover your new URLs?
- 27:28 Why does Google require a canonical on ALL AMP pages, including standalone ones?
- 27:40 Is the rel=canonical really mandatory on all AMP pages, even standalone ones?
- 28:09 Should you really implement hreflang across an entire multilingual site?
- 28:41 Should you really implement hreflang on every page of a multilingual website?
- 29:08 Is it true that AMP is a speed factor for Google?
- 29:16 Should you still invest in AMP to optimize speed and ranking?
- 29:50 Why does Google measure Core Web Vitals on the actual page version your visitors are really viewing?
- 30:20 Do Core Web Vitals really measure what your users actually see?
- 31:23 Should you manually deindex old pagination URLs after changing your site's architecture?
- 31:23 Is it really necessary to manually de-index your old pagination URLs?
- 32:08 Is advertising on your site harming your SEO?
- 32:48 Does having ads on your site really hurt your Google rankings?
- 34:47 Is rel=canonical in syndication really reliable for controlling indexing?
- 34:47 Does rel=canonical really protect your syndicated content from ranking theft?
- 38:14 Do security alerts in Search Console really block Google's crawling?
- 38:14 Can a hacked site lose its crawl budget due to Google security alerts?
- 39:20 Have links in guest posts really lost all SEO value?
- 39:20 Do guest post links really have no SEO value?
- 40:55 Why does Google ignore identical modification dates in your sitemaps?
- 40:55 Why does Google ignore the lastmod dates in your XML sitemap?
- 42:00 Should you really update the lastmod date of the sitemap for every minor change?
- 42:21 Does a poorly configured sitemap really diminish your crawl budget?
- 43:00 Can a misconfigured sitemap really cut down your crawl budget?
- 44:34 Should you really have to choose between reducing duplicate content and using canonical tags?
- 44:34 Is it really necessary to eliminate all duplicate content or should you rely on rel=canonical?
- 45:10 Should you really set a crawl limit in Search Console?
- 45:40 Should you really let Google decide your crawl limit?
- 47:08 Do internal 301 redirects really dilute PageRank?
- 47:48 Do cascading internal 301 redirects really drain SEO juice?
- 49:53 Can the JavaScript History API really force Google to change your canonical URL?
- 49:53 Can Google really treat URL changes made by JavaScript and the History API as redirects?
Google states that indexing all paginated pages is necessary to retrieve the full content and internal links of a site. Without distinct and crawlable URLs, Googlebot cannot discover all the products or articles listed deeply. The recommendation is clear: each paginated page must be accessible via standard HTML links, even in the case of infinite scroll.
What you need to understand
Why does Google emphasize the indexability of paginated pages?
John Mueller's statement addresses a major structural issue: without indexable paginated pages, Googlebot cannot explore the entire catalog of a site. On an e-commerce site with 500 products spread over 20 pages, if only the first is crawlable, 95% of the content remains invisible to the engine.
This situation frequently occurs with poorly designed JavaScript implementations, where dynamic loading does not generate distinct URLs. The Google crawler encounters a single URL always showing the same first 25 items — and stops there.
How does infinite scroll hinder Google's crawl?
Infinite scroll poses a technical challenge: it loads additional content as the user scrolls, but it doesn’t automatically create crawlable URLs. Googlebot does not perform infinite scrolling in its standard crawl processes — it follows links.
Without distinct URLs for each segment of content, the bot cannot return to a specific position in the list. Therefore, it is necessary to implement a hybrid architecture: infinite scroll on the user side, but accessible pagination URLs for the crawler via rel="next" and rel="prev" links or through a structured XML sitemap.
Are standard HTML links really indispensable?
Mueller stresses standard HTML links for a simple reason: they ensure discoverability without relying on JavaScript rendering. A link <a href="/category?page=2"> is instantly understood by Googlebot, even without executing the JavaScript.
This approach reduces crawl budget consumption and speeds up indexing. The bot can linearly navigate through all pages via previous/next links, without waiting for each page to fully render before discovering the next.
- Each pagination page must have a unique URL accessible via a standard HTML link
- Rel="next" and rel="prev" links are no longer officially used by Google, but structuring navigation with previous/next links remains essential
- Infinite scroll requires a hybrid implementation: smooth UX for the user, distinct URLs for the crawler
- The XML sitemap can complement the discovery of paginated pages, but does not replace internal links
- Googlebot does not scroll — it follows links and crawls URLs
SEO Expert opinion
Is this recommendation consistent with real-world observations?
Mueller's position aligns with what is observed on thousands of e-commerce sites: deep categories without crawlable pagination see their products ignored. Server logs confirm that Googlebot rarely visits beyond the first page if links to the next ones are absent or generated solely in JavaScript.
However, the reality is more nuanced for large sites. An e-commerce site with 10,000 products and 400 pagination pages will not necessarily see all its pages crawled, even if perfectly structured. The crawl budget becomes the limiting factor — and here, Mueller does not provide a numeric directive on the optimal number of pages to keep indexable. [To verify]: what depth of pagination does Google consider reasonable before the crawl budget becomes problematic?
What trade-offs should be accepted between UX and SEO?
Infinite scroll offers a smooth user experience, especially on mobile. Forcing users to click on "next page" may degrade engagement metrics. The hybrid solution proposed by Mueller — crawlable URLs in the background — is technically sound but complex to implement correctly.
The pitfall: many developers create pagination URLs that duplicate content or generate non-canonical parameters (?page=2, ?p=2, ?offset=20). Without rigorous management of canonicals and internal linking, more problems can be created than solved. Mueller's recommendation assumes a technical mastery that not all sites possess.
In which cases can this rule be ignored without risk?
If your site contains less than 50 items per category and you display everything on a single page, pagination obviously doesn't make sense. Similarly, on a blog with 30 posts, a single archive page is more than sufficient — no need for artificial pagination.
More controversially: some large-scale sites deliberately choose to limit the indexable pagination depth to 5-10 pages at most, guiding users towards filters and internal searches. They sacrifice exhaustive indexing in favor of crawl budget and the quality of the pages explored. This approach directly contradicts Mueller's recommendation, but can be justified on sites with tens of thousands of scarcely differentiated pages. [To verify]: Does Google actively penalize this strategy or tolerate this pragmatic compromise?
Practical impact and recommendations
What concrete steps should be taken to optimize pagination?
The first step is to audit the current architecture: do all paginated pages have a unique and stable URL? Are the previous/next links present in pure HTML in the source code? Use a crawler like Screaming Frog or Botify to simulate Googlebot's behavior and identify orphan pages.
Next, ensure that pagination links are indeed present in the initial HTML, not only injected via JavaScript after loading. The Search Console can reveal known pages that are not crawled — often a symptom of broken pagination.
What mistakes should be avoided during implementation?
The most common mistake: using JavaScript buttons for navigation without HTML fallback. The crawler will never click on a <button onclick="loadPage(2)"> — it needs a <a href="?page=2">.
Another trap: adding noindex tags on paginated pages to avoid duplicate content. This is exactly the opposite of what Mueller recommends — you block the indexing of pages that Google needs to discover your complete content. The correct approach: canonical to the page itself, not to page 1.
How to check that the implementation works?
Start with a manual test: disable JavaScript in your browser and check that you can navigate between pagination pages via previous/next links. If you can't, neither can Googlebot.
Then analyze the server logs to confirm that Googlebot is indeed crawling pages 2, 3, 4, etc. If the crawl systematically stops at page 1, it means the links are not detected. The Search Console can also reveal how many paginated pages are indexed — compare this number to the theoretical number of pages you created.
- Create a unique and crawlable URL for each paginated page (e.g., /category?page=2 or /category/page/2/)
- Add standard HTML links <a href> to previous/next pages in the initial source code
- Never block paginated pages with noindex, robots.txt, or canonical to page 1
- Implement a hybrid solution if infinite scroll: background URLs for the crawler
- Check server logs to confirm that Googlebot crawls beyond the first page
- Regularly audit the Search Console to detect known but uncrawled pages
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Dois-je utiliser les balises rel="next" et rel="prev" pour la pagination ?
Les pages de pagination doivent-elles avoir une balise canonical vers la page 1 ?
Combien de pages de pagination Google peut-il crawler sur un site ?
L'infinite scroll est-il compatible avec le SEO selon cette recommandation ?
Faut-il ajouter toutes les pages de pagination dans le sitemap XML ?
🎥 From the same video 49
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 55 min · published on 21/08/2020
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.