What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

Nofollow tags continue to be used to indicate to search engines that certain pages or links are less important to crawl, especially for internal links in facet navigation.
24:14
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 57:16 💬 EN 📅 20/09/2019 ✂ 13 statements
Watch on YouTube (24:14) →
Other statements from this video 12
  1. 1:19 Faut-il vraiment garder vos pages d'événements en ligne après la date ?
  2. 4:37 Diviser ou fusionner un site : pourquoi Google ne transfère-t-il pas la valeur SEO comme pour un simple move ?
  3. 5:23 Faut-il vraiment éviter les doubles bylines pour ne pas perturber Google ?
  4. 7:17 Google restreint les extraits enrichis d'avis : quels sites sont désormais exclus de la SERP ?
  5. 13:08 Comment enlever efficacement les pages hackées des résultats de recherche Google ?
  6. 16:56 Les bannières GDPR bloquent-elles vraiment l'indexation de vos contenus par Googlebot ?
  7. 21:42 Faut-il héberger ses images sur un sous-domaine CDN pour optimiser leur indexation ?
  8. 31:39 Le JavaScript nuit-il encore au crawl Google en l'absence de rendu côté serveur ?
  9. 37:55 Le mobile-first indexing s'applique-t-il vraiment à tous les sites sans exception ?
  10. 38:23 Les sous-types de schéma affectent-ils réellement l'affichage des extraits enrichis ?
  11. 43:00 Pourquoi robots.txt et noindex ne suffisent-ils pas pour protéger vos serveurs de staging ?
  12. 46:20 Comment Google calcule-t-il vraiment la position affichée dans la Search Console ?
📅
Official statement from (6 years ago)
TL;DR

Google confirms that the nofollow tag remains a valid tool for signaling to search engines which internal links are less of a priority to crawl, particularly in facet navigation systems. For e-commerce sites or complex catalogs, it's a lever to save crawl budget and avoid indexing unnecessary pages. The question remains whether it’s still the best strategy compared to modern alternatives like robots.txt or canonicals.

What you need to understand

Why is Google still discussing nofollow in the context of facets?

Facet navigation — those multiple filters on e-commerce sites (size, color, price, brand…) — generates nearly infinite combinations of URLs. Each filter applied potentially creates a new page. Without control, a search engine can end up crawling thousands of redundant or SEO-value-less pages.

Mueller reminds us that nofollow allows bots to be informed about which internal links are less important. It’s a historical signal, originally introduced to combat comment spam. However, Google has always tolerated it internally, even if other methods exist.

Is internal nofollow still treated as a crawl signal?

Since March 2020, Google treats nofollow as a “hint” rather than a strict directive. What does that mean? The bot can choose to ignore it. In practice, on internal links, it is still largely respected — especially in contexts where crawl budget is critical.

Mueller does not specify whether this statement reflects guaranteed behavior or mere tolerance. It’s unclear. But on the ground, we observe that nofollow on facets continues to work to limit exploration of unnecessary combinations, provided the website structure is sound otherwise.

What alternatives to nofollow exist for managing facets?

Nofollow is not the only option. The robots.txt file can completely block the crawl of specific URL patterns. Canonicals consolidate variants to a master page. The URL Parameters Handling in Search Console (now deprecated) also allowed for signaling facet parameters.

Each method has its advantages. Robots.txt is radical but can create blind spots if misconfigured. Canonical preserves crawl but requires PageRank. Nofollow is a middle ground: the link exists for the user, but the bot receives a signal of lower priority.

  • Internal nofollow: a soft signal, largely respected in practice, easy to implement on filter links
  • Robots.txt: total crawl block, risks obscuring legitimate content if poorly calibrated
  • Canonical: allows crawl but redirects equity to the main page, consumes budget
  • Meta noindex: allows crawl but blocks indexing, a hybrid solution but resource-intensive
  • Conditional JavaScript: show facet links only after user interaction, complicating bot rendering

SEO Expert opinion

Is this recommendation consistent with on-the-ground observations?

Yes, overall. On e-commerce sites with several thousand references, nofollow on facets continues to significantly reduce the number of pages crawled unnecessarily. Server logs show that Googlebot less frequently follows links marked nofollow, even if it’s not an absolute guarantee.

But be cautious: Mueller refers to “less important” pages or links, not “useless.” Subtlety matters. If a facet page can rank for a niche query (e.g., “blue running shoes size 42”), marking it as nofollow sacrifices an opportunity. [To be verified]: Google does not explicitly state if nofollow harms the ranking potential of a page crawled otherwise.

What are the limitations and risks of this approach?

Internal nofollow can create unintended silos. If all facets are in nofollow, internal linking weakens. Deep product pages may become less accessible to the bot if they are only linked through nofollowed filters.

Furthermore, too much internal nofollow can send a confusing signal: why does your site offer links it deems “less important”? It’s an admission of a shaky structure. A better architecture — for example, stable category pages + facets in canonical — resolves the problem at the source rather than masking it.

When is nofollow not the right solution?

If your site has fewer than 500 pages, crawl budget is not a concern. Adding nofollow everywhere falls into the cargo cult SEO trap. Google will crawl your entire site anyway.

Similarly, if your facets generate unique content (differentiated descriptions, filtered customer reviews, localized stocks), treating them as nofollow wastes long-tail potential. In this case, it's better to index and optimize. Nofollow is a defensive tactic, not an offensive one.

Warning: Nofollow does not deindex a page. If it’s already indexed or accessible by another route (sitemap, external link), it will remain in the index. To fully exclude it, a noindex or robots.txt is necessary.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you concretely do on a facet site?

Start by auditing your server logs. Identify how many facet pages Googlebot crawls, and compare that with the volume of strategic pages (product sheets, main categories). If the ratio is unbalanced — for example, 70% of the crawl on facets vs. 30% on selling content — you have a problem.

Next, segment your facets. Not all are created equal. A “brand” or “price” filter on a broad category may have ranking potential. However, a “size + color + material” filter is often redundant. Apply nofollow only on low-value combinations.

What mistakes to avoid in implementation?

Do not put all internal links as nofollow out of precaution. It’s counterproductive. Internal linking is one of the few levers you control 100%. Weakening it intentionally is like shooting yourself in the foot.

Another pitfall: nofollow on pagination links. If you paginate your product lists, these links should remain follow so that Googlebot can access the entire catalog. Confusing pagination with facets is a classic mistake that orphaned entire parts of content.

How to check if the strategy is working?

Monitor three metrics in Search Console: pages crawled per day, unindexed discovered pages, and indexed but unvisited pages. If after implementing nofollow, crawl focuses better on your strategic pages and the rate of indexing of unnecessary pages decreases, you’ve succeeded.

At the same time, check in Google Analytics that your organic traffic on facet pages does not collapse. If some facets were indeed ranking, you would see a drop. In this case, you need to arbitrate: saved crawl budget vs. lost long-tail opportunities.

  • Audit server logs to measure the distribution of crawl between facets and strategic pages
  • Identify low SEO value facet combinations (multiple cumulative filters, redundant parameters)
  • Apply nofollow only on non-strategic facet links, not on pagination or main categories
  • Ensure product pages remain accessible via at least one follow path (categories, XML sitemap)
  • Monitor the evolution of crawl and indexing in Search Console after deployment
  • Compare with a mixed approach (canonical + selective nofollow) for fine optimization
Nofollow remains a relevant tool for steering crawl on complex architectures, provided it is used judiciously. It is neither a miracle solution nor an obsolete practice — just a leverage among others. The challenge is to preserve the crawl budget for pages that matter without sacrificing traffic opportunities on well-optimized facets. If your site exceeds several thousand pages and you notice crawl waste, a thorough technical audit is necessary. These optimizations can quickly become complex to calibrate alone, especially on e-commerce platforms where every misconfiguration can cost dearly in visibility. Engaging a specialized SEO agency can provide a tailored analysis, fine-tuning based on your real logs, and ongoing monitoring to adjust the strategy according to changes in your catalog and Google's behavior.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Le nofollow sur liens internes empêche-t-il totalement le crawl de la page cible ?
Non. Google traite le nofollow comme un indice depuis mars 2020, pas une directive absolue. Le bot peut choisir de crawler la page quand même si elle est accessible par un autre chemin (sitemap, lien externe, lien interne follow ailleurs). Le nofollow réduit la priorité, il ne bloque pas.
Faut-il préférer le nofollow ou le robots.txt pour gérer les facettes ?
Ça dépend. Le robots.txt bloque complètement le crawl, ce qui est radical mais risqué si mal configuré. Le nofollow laisse le lien visible pour l'utilisateur et donne un signal souple au bot. Si tu veux juste dé-prioriser sans interdire, le nofollow est plus safe. Si tu veux exclure totalement, robots.txt ou noindex.
Est-ce que mettre du nofollow sur des facettes nuit au PageRank interne ?
Historiquement, oui — le PageRank « s'évaporait » sur les liens nofollow. Depuis le passage en mode « hint », Google peut choisir de le transmettre ou non. Terrain, on observe que le nofollow interne conserve généralement un peu d'équité, mais moins qu'un lien follow classique. C'est un compromis.
Peut-on combiner nofollow et canonical sur une même page de facette ?
Oui, et c'est même cohérent dans certains cas. Le canonical dit « cette page est une variante de X », le nofollow dit « ne priorise pas ce lien pour le crawl ». Les deux signaux sont complémentaires : le canonical gère l'indexation, le nofollow le budget de crawl.
Le nofollow sur facettes est-il pertinent pour un site de moins de 1000 pages ?
Rarement. En dessous de 1000 pages, le crawl budget n'est pas un enjeu — Google crawlera ton site en entier sans difficulté. Ajouter du nofollow relève alors de l'optimisation prématurée. Concentre-toi plutôt sur la qualité du contenu et du maillage interne.
🏷 Related Topics
Domain Age & History Content Crawl & Indexing AI & SEO Links & Backlinks Pagination & Structure

🎥 From the same video 12

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 57 min · published on 20/09/2019

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.