Official statement
Other statements from this video 9 ▾
- 17:00 Les accordéons et onglets sont-ils vraiment pris en compte par Google en mobile-first ?
- 40:14 Pourquoi Google refuse-t-il officiellement le noindex dans le robots.txt ?
- 46:13 La vitesse de site est-elle vraiment un facteur de classement ou juste un mythe SEO ?
- 47:44 Faut-il vraiment croiser rel='canonical' et rel='alternate' entre versions desktop et mobile ?
- 56:03 Faut-il vraiment craindre un afflux massif de backlinks lors d'un lancement de site ?
- 64:52 Pourquoi 15 % des requêtes Google sont-elles totalement inconnues de l'algorithme chaque jour ?
- 70:06 Faut-il vraiment renvoyer une 404 plutôt qu'une redirection pour les produits e-commerce disparus ?
- 75:09 Les redirections automatiques basées sur la langue nuisent-elles à l'indexation multilingue ?
- 101:09 Les URL dynamiques en JavaScript posent-elles vraiment un problème d'indexation ?
Google clearly distinguishes manual actions from algorithmic fluctuations: if nothing appears in the dedicated section of Search Console, your site is not under a manual penalty. This distinction eliminates 90% of erroneous diagnostics where traffic drops are wrongly attributed to sanctions. In practice, check Search Console first before investing in an expensive backlink audit.
What you need to understand
What is the difference between a manual action and an algorithmic penalty?
Terminology matters. Google uses the term 'manual actions' to denote sanctions applied by a human reviewer after site verification. These actions are always notified in Search Console, accompanied by a precise description of the identified problem.
Algorithmic penalties do not officially exist in Google's vocabulary. What SEOs refer to as 'Penguin penalty' or 'Panda penalty' are actually automatic ranking adjustments due to the detection of low-quality signals. No notification is sent in these cases, as Google considers them a normal operation of the algorithm.
Where can you find these manual actions in Search Console?
The section can be found under 'Security and Manual Actions' in the sidebar menu of Search Console. If this page indicates 'No issues detected', your site is clean concerning manual sanctions. There's no possible gray area.
Each manual action includes three critical pieces of information: the type of violation (link spam, low-quality content, cloaking, etc.), the scope of the action (entire site or specific pages), and the detection date. These details help pinpoint the corrective work needed.
Does this statement cover all types of visibility issues?
No. This is a point that many clients do not immediately grasp. An organic traffic drop can have twenty different causes without any manual action being involved: core algorithm update, content cannibalization, technical issues, evolving search intent, rising competitors.
Manual actions represent less than 5% of the visibility drop cases I handle in audits. The rest? It's about fine-tuned detection requiring cross-analysis of Search Console, server logs, SERP evolution, and performance metrics.
- No manual action ≠ no issues with the site: the algorithm can demote you without a notification
- Manual actions are documented: each notification precisely explains what the problem is
- Removing the action requires a reconsideration request: fixing the problem is not enough, you have to ask Google
- Variable processing time: from a few days to several weeks depending on the case complexity
- Recurrence possible: a lifted action can be reapplied if problematic practices resume
SEO Expert opinion
Is this communication from Google consistent with what we observe in practice?
Yes, and it is even one of the few points where Google maintains total transparency. In fifteen years of practice, I have never seen a single case of an unnotified manual action in Search Console. Zero. When Google manually sanctions, it systematically informs about it.
The problem lies elsewhere: the majority of webmasters never check their Search Console, or have not set up email alerts. The outcome? They discover the manual action three months after it was applied, when traffic has already collapsed. In these cases, clients swear they were 'never informed', while the notification patiently awaited in their interface.
What nuances should be added to this statement?
The phrase 'no manual penalty applies' can create a false sense of security. A site can be completely clean regarding manual actions and yet still be invisible in search results for other reasons.
I have seen sites lose 70% of their organic traffic due to a Helpful Content Update, without any manual action. The owner, seeing the clean Search Console, thought 'everything was fine' and did not understand the collapse. [To be verified]: Google could be more explicit about the distinction between manual sanctions and algorithmic adjustments in its communication.
In what cases does this rule not apply?
There is a gray area with mass deindexations. Technically, this is not always a 'manual action' in the strict sense, but the outcome can be identical: pages disappear from the index without a clear notification.
Some extreme cases of duplicate content or scraping can lead to silent deindexing without a formal manual action being triggered. Google simply considers that these pages do not belong in the index. No sanction, just a default exclusion. The distinction is subtle, but it exists.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you check first if your traffic drops?
Your first instinct should be to open Search Console and check the 'Security and Manual Actions' section. If it's empty, immediately eliminate the hypothesis of a manual sanction. You've just saved hours of investigation in the wrong direction.
Next, cross-reference with the index coverage report to detect massive indexing issues, and check the 'Performance' report to identify if the drop concerns specific keywords or the entire site. These three checks take ten minutes and guide 80% of the diagnosis.
How to handle a manual action if you detect one?
Read carefully the description provided by Google. Each manual action includes a list of affected pages and an explanation of the detected problem. Do not rush into random corrections before you have fully understood what is being criticized.
Once the corrections are made (removing toxic links, deleting duplicated content, eliminating cloaking techniques, etc.), document your work. The reconsideration request must demonstrate that you have understood the problem and taken concrete actions. 'I removed the bad links' is not enough. Be detailed: how many links, what removal methods, what tools used, what percentage of success.
What mistakes to avoid when interpreting this statement?
The classic mistake: confusing absence of manual action with validation of the SEO strategy. Your site can adhere to anti-spam guidelines while still being mediocre in terms of content quality, user experience, or topical relevance.
Another common pitfall: neglecting partial manual actions. Some only concern a section of the site (for example, an abandoned old blog full of spam). The rest of the site performs normally, which masks the problem. Regularly check Search Console even when everything seems to be going well.
- Set up email alerts in Search Console to be immediately notified of any manual actions
- Check the 'Manual Actions' section at least once a month as part of your SEO routine
- In case of a traffic drop, first eliminate the hypothesis of a manual action before exploring other leads
- Document all corrections precisely before submitting a reconsideration request
- Keep a history of past manual actions to identify any recurring patterns
- Train marketing teams to check Search Console regularly, not just in crisis situations
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Une action manuelle disparaît-elle automatiquement après correction du problème ?
Combien de temps faut-il pour qu'une demande de réexamen soit traitée ?
Peut-on avoir plusieurs actions manuelles simultanées sur un même site ?
Les actions manuelles affectent-elles uniquement Google ou aussi les autres moteurs de recherche ?
Si mon concurrent a une action manuelle visible, puis-je en profiter pour le dénoncer à Google ?
🎥 From the same video 9
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 1h13 · published on 27/01/2017
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.