What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 3 questions

Less than 30 seconds. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~30s 🎯 3 questions 📚 SEO Google

Official statement

Top Stories and the News tab are essentially specific variations of Google search. Any site can appear there, not just news sites listed in Google News. Each surface employs different ranking algorithms.
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

💬 EN 📅 13/11/2020 ✂ 40 statements
Watch on YouTube →
Other statements from this video 39
  1. Redirection 301 ou canonical pour fusionner deux sites : quelle différence pour le SEO ?
  2. Comment apparaître dans les Top Stories sans être un site d'actualités ?
  3. Comment Google détermine-t-il réellement la date de publication d'un article ?
  4. Les pages orphelines sont-elles vraiment invisibles pour Google ?
  5. Les Core Web Vitals vont-ils vraiment bouleverser votre classement SEO ?
  6. Pourquoi vos tests locaux de performance ne correspondent-ils jamais aux données Search Console ?
  7. Faut-il vraiment utiliser rel="sponsored" plutôt que nofollow pour ses liens affiliés ?
  8. Un même site peut-il monopoliser toute la première page de Google ?
  9. Faut-il vraiment optimiser vos pages pour les mots 'best' et 'top' ?
  10. Pourquoi Google met-il 3 à 6 mois pour crawler votre refonte complète ?
  11. La longueur d'article influence-t-elle vraiment le classement Google ?
  12. Faut-il vraiment matcher les mots-clés mot pour mot dans vos contenus SEO ?
  13. L'indexation Google est-elle vraiment instantanée ou existe-t-il des délais cachés ?
  14. Faut-il vraiment choisir entre redirection 301 et canonical pour fusionner deux sites ?
  15. Top Stories et News utilisent-ils vraiment des algorithmes différents de la recherche classique ?
  16. Pourquoi l'onglet Google News n'affiche-t-il pas forcément vos articles par ordre chronologique ?
  17. Les pages orphelines peuvent-elles vraiment nuire au référencement de votre site ?
  18. Les Core Web Vitals vont-ils vraiment bouleverser le classement dans les SERP ?
  19. Rel=nofollow ou rel=sponsored pour les liens d'affiliation : y a-t-il vraiment une différence ?
  20. Google limite-t-il vraiment le nombre de fois qu'un domaine peut apparaître dans les résultats ?
  21. Faut-il vraiment arrêter d'utiliser des mots-clés en correspondance exacte dans vos contenus ?
  22. Pourquoi la spécificité du contenu prime-t-elle sur le bourrage de mots-clés ?
  23. La longueur d'un article influence-t-elle vraiment son classement dans Google ?
  24. Pourquoi Google met-il 3 à 6 mois à rafraîchir l'intégralité d'un gros site ?
  25. Faut-il arrêter de soumettre manuellement des URL à Google ?
  26. Faut-il vraiment intégrer « best » et « top » dans vos contenus pour ranker sur ces requêtes ?
  27. Faut-il vraiment choisir entre redirection 301 et canonical pour fusionner deux sites ?
  28. Faut-il vraiment aligner les dates visibles et les données structurées pour le classement chronologique ?
  29. Les pages orphelines pénalisent-elles vraiment votre référencement ?
  30. Les Core Web Vitals sont-ils vraiment devenus un facteur de classement déterminant ?
  31. Faut-il vraiment privilégier rel=sponsored sur les liens d'affiliation ou nofollow suffit-il ?
  32. Faut-il vraiment marquer ses liens d'affiliation pour éviter une pénalité Google ?
  33. Un même site peut-il vraiment apparaître 7 fois sur la même SERP ?
  34. Faut-il vraiment optimiser vos pages pour 'best', 'top' ou 'near me' ?
  35. Pourquoi Google met-il 3 à 6 mois à rafraîchir les grands sites ?
  36. La longueur d'un article influence-t-elle vraiment son classement Google ?
  37. Faut-il vraiment matcher les mots-clés exacts dans vos contenus SEO ?
  38. Google applique-t-il vraiment un délai d'indexation basé sur la qualité de vos pages ?
  39. Pourquoi Google affiche-t-il encore l'ancien domaine dans les requêtes site: après une redirection 301 ?
📅
Official statement from (5 years ago)
TL;DR

Google confirms that Top Stories and the News tab are not limited to news sites: any website can feature there. These surfaces use ranking algorithms distinct from traditional search, each with its own criteria. For SEOs, this means optimizing for these placements requires a differentiated approach beyond simply publishing fresh content.

What you need to understand

What exactly are Top Stories and why do they matter?

The Top Stories block appears at the top of search results for queries related to news, recent events, or trending topics. It's a visual carousel of a few articles, often illustrated, that captures massive user attention. For sites that appear there, it's a source of massive and highly qualified organic traffic.

The News tab, accessible from the Google search bar, aggregates news content according to broader criteria. Unlike Top Stories, which targets very short-term content (hours, days), the News tab can display slightly older content. But both function as specific search variations, with their own filters, not as an extension of Google News.

Can any site really show up there?

Yes, and this is the crux of Mueller's statement. You do not need to be approved by Google News nor be a recognized media outlet. A corporate blog, an e-commerce site with a news section, or a niche site publishing fresh content can theoretically appear in Top Stories or the News tab. The reality on the ground is obviously more nuanced—the established news sites largely dominate these spaces—but technical access is not locked.

Let’s be honest: if you publish a corporate blog post on trends in your industry, it won’t displace Le Monde or Reuters. However, for niche queries, ultra-specialized topics, or local events, the door is open. Google prioritizes contextual relevance and freshness for these surfaces, not just historical editorial authority.

What changes if the ranking algorithms are different?

This is where it becomes tactical. The criteria for ranking in classic search—backlinks, domain authority, content depth—are not sufficient for Top Stories. Google applies specific filters: extreme freshness of content, structured data Article, loading speed (Core Web Vitals weigh heavily here), quality of the featured image, and likely enhanced E-E-A-T signals on YMYL topics.

Another major difference: the latency time between publication and indexing must be minimal. If your XML sitemap takes 6 hours to notify Googlebot of a new article, you’re already out. Sites performing in Top Stories generally use the Indexing API (officially reserved for videos and job listings but functional for articles) or ultra-fast pings via real-time sitemap.

  • Top Stories and News are not limited to sites listed in Google News—any site can appear there.
  • Distinct algorithms: ranking in Top Stories requires other optimizations than ranking in classic position 1.
  • Freshness and indexing speed are critical: an article published 2 hours ago but crawled 10 minutes ago has almost no chance.
  • Structured data Article or NewsArticle is practically mandatory, even if Google says it’s not an absolute criterion.
  • Core Web Vitals are particularly scrutinized on these surfaces—a LCP of 4 seconds disqualifies you outright.

SEO Expert opinion

Does this statement contradict ground observations?

Not really, but it overlooks a reality: Top Stories is overwhelmingly dominated by traditional news sites. Saying "any site can appear there" is technically true, but in practice, for generic queries ("inflation", "elections", "weather"), you'll only see established media. Non-media sites show up for long-tail niche queries where editorial competition is low.

I have observed cases where B2B blogs, community sites, or specialized portals appear in Top Stories, but always on hyper-targeted topics: tech product announcements, local events, regulatory sector issues. As soon as search volume increases and general media covers the topic, they get pushed out. [To be verified]: Google claims not to have an editorial whitelist, but recurring domain patterns suggest implicit editorial authority signals that massively favor sites historically recognized as media.

What are the gray areas or the unspoken parts of this statement?

Mueller intentionally remains vague about the precise ranking criteria for Top Stories. We know freshness matters, structured data helps, Core Web Vitals play a role—but to what extent? Impossible to quantify. Google also says nothing about the role of user signals: CTR from Top Stories, bounce rates, time spent on page. Yet, these metrics likely carry significant weight in adjusting rankings in real-time.

Another opaque area: the distinction between the News tab and Top Stories. Mueller says they are "specific variations" with different algorithms, but does not clarify which ones or how to optimize for one versus the other. In practice, an article that appears in Top Stories often ends up in the News tab, but the reverse is less systematic. This suggests that Top Stories has stricter filters, likely related to the timeliness of the news and the immediate popularity of the topic.

Finally, Mueller says nothing about the role of Google Discover in this ecosystem. Discover, Top Stories, and the News tab clearly share common signals (freshness, engagement, visual quality), but Google maintains total opacity regarding the gateways between these surfaces. [To be verified]: some SEOs suspect that performing in Discover boosts your chances of appearing in Top Stories, but no official data confirms this.

Should we take Google's word for it or remain skeptical?

Mueller's statement is factually accurate but strategically incomplete. Yes, any site can appear in Top Stories—but no, it’s not a level playing field. News sites have a structural advantage: publication frequency, dedicated editorial teams, technical infrastructure optimized for speed, massive backlinks from other media. A corporate site publishing one article a week has no chance of competing, even with technically perfect content.

What annoys me about this type of communication is that it creates the impression that technical optimization is sufficient. No. For Top Stories, you need an aggressive editorial strategy, the ability to publish quickly on hot topics, and already solid domain authority. If you're starting from scratch, it's better to forget about Top Stories and focus on traditional search where the competition is more open.

Practical impact and recommendations

How to concretely optimize for Top Stories and the News tab?

First step: indexing speed. If Google takes more than 30 minutes to crawl your new article, you’re already out of the running. Use a dynamic XML sitemap that updates in real-time with each publication. If your CMS allows it, send a manual ping via Search Console or the Indexing API (officially for videos/jobs, but functional for articles—at your own risk). Test with tools like Instant Indexing Plugin or IndexNow to speed up discovery.

Second lever: impeccable structured data. Use Article or NewsArticle depending on the nature of the content, with headline, image (minimum 1200x675px, 16:9 ratio), datePublished, dateModified, author with a valid AuthorURL. Google says this is not mandatory, but in practice, 95% of articles visible in Top Stories have perfectly marked structured data. Leave no errors in Search Console—any missing field can disqualify you.

Third axis: ultra-optimized Core Web Vitals. LCP under 2 seconds, CLS under 0.1, minimal FID/INP. Top Stories often appear on mobile in 4G, so your article must load instantly even in degraded network conditions. Compress your images (WebP or AVIF), lazy-load everything below the fold, eliminate blocking third-party scripts. A slow article will never rank in Top Stories, even if it's editorially perfect.

What mistakes should you absolutely avoid?

Classic mistake: publishing “fresh” content without a news angle. A blog post dated today but covering a timeless topic ("How to optimize your on-page SEO") has no chance in Top Stories. It requires a clear event anchoring: product announcement, regulatory update, industry event, emerging trend. If your content could have been published 6 months ago without losing relevance, forget Top Stories.

Another trap: neglecting the featured image. Google displays a visual in the Top Stories carousel, and CTR heavily depends on its quality. A pixelated, poorly framed, or irrelevant image kills your click rate even if you rank. Invest in professional visuals, avoid generic stock photos, favor custom illustrations or annotated screenshots that catch the eye.

Third mistake: confusing News tab with Top Stories. The News tab is more permissive, accepts slightly less fresh content, and covers broader topics. Top Stories is ultra-competitive, changes every minute, and targets real-time events. If you cannot publish within an hour of a hot event, focus on the News tab where you have a shooting window of 24-48 hours.

What strategy to adopt if you are not a news outlet?

Be ultra-selective on topics. Do not try to cover general news—you will lose against established media. Target hyper-specialized niches where your sector expertise gives you an advantage: regulatory announcements in your industry, B2B events, tech product launches, exclusive case studies. If you are the first to publish on a niche topic, you have a window of a few hours where you can dominate Top Stories before general media takes over.

Another tactic: localize your content. Local or regional queries have much less competition in Top Stories. An article on "new urban planning regulations in Lyon" has a better chance than an article on "new urban planning regulations in France". Google prioritizes geographical relevance when the user has even an implicit local intent.

These optimizations require a solid technical infrastructure and sharp editorial expertise. If you do not have the internal resources to maintain this pace, it may be wise to work with a specialized SEO agency that masters these mechanics and can structure a strategy suited to your sector.

  • Set up a real-time XML sitemap and test the Indexing API to speed up post-publication crawling.
  • Validate your structured data Article/NewsArticle in Google’s validator—no errors tolerated.
  • Audit your Core Web Vitals on mobile 4G: LCP < 2s, CLS < 0.1, minimal INP.
  • Create high-quality featured visuals, 16:9 ratio, minimum 1200x675px, optimized weight (< 150KB).
  • Target niche or local topics where media competition is low—forget about general news.
  • Publish within an hour of a hot event if you aim for Top Stories, within 24 hours for the News tab.
To appear in Top Stories or the News tab without being a media outlet, you need to combine extreme indexing speed, advanced technical optimizations, and ultra-targeted editorial strategy. The time window is short, the competition fierce, but in specialized niches or local queries, it's achievable. Don’t spread your efforts across general news—focus on topics where your expertise gives you an editorial advantage.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Dois-je obligatoirement être inscrit dans Google News pour apparaître dans Top Stories ?
Non. Google confirme que n'importe quel site peut apparaître dans Top Stories ou l'onglet News, sans inscription préalable dans Google News. Cependant, les sites d'actualités établis dominent ces surfaces en pratique.
Quelles données structurées sont indispensables pour Top Stories ?
Article ou NewsArticle avec headline, image (min 1200x675px), datePublished, dateModified, author. Bien que Google dise que ce n'est pas obligatoire, 95% des articles visibles dans Top Stories les utilisent sans erreur.
Combien de temps ai-je pour publier après un événement pour apparaître dans Top Stories ?
Moins d'une heure pour Top Stories, qui cible l'actualité immédiate. Pour l'onglet News, vous avez une fenêtre de 24-48h, ce qui le rend plus accessible aux non-médias.
Les Core Web Vitals impactent-ils vraiment le classement dans Top Stories ?
Oui, de manière critique. Un LCP lent (> 2,5s) ou un CLS élevé vous disqualifie en pratique, car Google privilégie l'expérience mobile ultra-rapide sur ces surfaces.
Puis-je apparaître dans Top Stories avec du contenu evergreen daté d'aujourd'hui ?
Non. Il faut un ancrage événementiel clair : annonce, mise à jour, événement, tendance émergente. Un contenu intemporel simplement daté du jour n'a aucune chance, même avec des optimisations parfaites.
🏷 Related Topics
Algorithms Discover & News AI & SEO Pagination & Structure

🎥 From the same video 39

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · published on 13/11/2020

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.