What does Google say about SEO? /
Quick SEO Quiz

Test your SEO knowledge in 5 questions

Less than a minute. Find out how much you really know about Google search.

🕒 ~1 min 🎯 5 questions

Official statement

Conduct tests with your own crawling to see how Googlebot explores your site after changes, especially if you are implementing techniques like infinite scrolling.
34:57
🎥 Source video

Extracted from a Google Search Central video

⏱ 55:12 💬 EN 📅 17/10/2019 ✂ 14 statements
Watch on YouTube (34:57) →
Other statements from this video 13
  1. 1:44 Faut-il vraiment pointer les hreflang vers la version canonique de la page ?
  2. 5:34 Faut-il supprimer massivement les pages à faible valeur ajoutée de votre site ?
  3. 6:25 Faut-il vraiment supprimer massivement du contenu pour améliorer son crawl budget ?
  4. 11:05 Faut-il encore optimiser ses meta descriptions si Google les réécrit ?
  5. 11:14 Google réécrit-il systématiquement vos meta descriptions ?
  6. 14:01 Les meta descriptions influencent-elles vraiment le classement SEO ou seulement le CTR ?
  7. 20:12 Faut-il regrouper les variantes produits sur une seule page ou les éclater ?
  8. 23:25 Optimiser les titres et descriptions améliore-t-il vraiment votre ranking Google ?
  9. 24:17 Le title est-il vraiment un signal de ranking faible comme Google le prétend ?
  10. 30:21 Le duplicate content interne est-il vraiment sans danger pour votre e-commerce ?
  11. 32:02 Le scrolling infini est-il un piège mortel pour l'indexation Google ?
  12. 50:38 Faut-il vraiment modérer le contenu généré par les utilisateurs pour protéger son référencement ?
  13. 74:44 Faut-il bloquer l'indexation des fichiers Javascript avec noindex ?
📅
Official statement from (6 years ago)
TL;DR

Google recommends testing the impact of your technical modifications through your own crawl before deployment, especially for mechanisms like infinite scrolling. The idea is to anticipate how Googlebot will explore your new architecture rather than discovering issues after indexing. This advice seems obvious, but how many sites actually put their redesigns through a full crawl before going live?

What you need to understand

Why does Google stress the importance of crawling beforehand?

Googlebot explores your site according to specific rules: limited crawl budget, adherence to robots.txt, specific JavaScript behavior. When you change the site structure—technical migration, transitioning to infinite scrolling, overhaul of information architecture—you alter the access paths to the content.

A simulated crawl allows you to identify in advance orphaned URLs, redirect loops, blocked resources, or content that has become inaccessible. You see exactly what the bot will see, without waiting for Google to index a broken version.

Does infinite scrolling pose a particular problem for Googlebot?

Infinite scrolling loads content dynamically via JavaScript. If your implementation relies solely on scroll events without HTML fallback, Googlebot may stop after the first screen.

Even though Google executes JavaScript, the crawl budget is not infinitely extensible. A home crawl with a simulated Googlebot user-agent reveals how many products, articles, or categories the bot actually discovers. You identify black holes before they impact your rankings.

What tools can test how Googlebot explores?

Professional SEO crawlers like Screaming Frog, OnCrawl, or Botify simulate Googlebot's behavior: tracking redirects, adhering to directives, and optional JavaScript rendering. You configure the user-agent, crawl limits, and compare before/after modifications.

For infinite scrolling specifically, test with JavaScript rendering enabled and verify that the dynamically loaded URLs show up in the DOM. If your tool doesn't detect the new products after scrolling, neither will Googlebot.

  • Crawl your staging with the same rules as Googlebot before any production deployment
  • Compare the logs: simulated crawl vs real server logs after launch to validate consistency
  • Test variants: with/without JavaScript, mobile/desktop, different user-agents
  • Document discrepancies: every URL inaccessible during crawl is a red flag to correct
  • Automate tests: integrate crawling into your CI/CD pipeline to avoid regressions

SEO Expert opinion

Is this recommendation truly applied in practice?

Let’s be honest: very few sites perform a full crawl before every technical change. Redesigns often roll out under tight timelines, and SEO testing boils down to a manual check of a few key URLs. The result: catastrophic migrations detected weeks later, when organic traffic has already dropped by 40%.

e-commerce sites with thousands of products are particularly exposed. A change in pagination, a new filtering system, or poorly implemented infinite scrolling can orphan thousands of product listings without anyone noticing until the next GA4 report.

What nuances should be added to this advice?

The prior crawl does not guarantee anything about ranking. You validate that Googlebot can technically explore your content, not that it will index or rank it. A perfectly crawlable site can see its traffic plummet if the redesign dilutes relevance signals or disrupts the internal linking.

Another limitation: crawl tools simulate Googlebot at a specific point in time. The bot’s actual behavior evolves (variable crawl budget, prioritization of fresh URLs, management of JavaScript resources). Your tests need to be regular, not one-off. [To be verified]: Google does not provide any metrics on the average discrepancy between simulated crawl and actual crawl—so we are working blind on accuracy.

When is this test genuinely critical?

Three scenarios make prior crawling essential: migrating to a new technical stack (changing CMS, moving to headless), complete overhaul of information architecture, or implementing heavy JavaScript mechanisms (SPA, infinite scroll, dynamic filters).

For minor modifications—adding a blog section, changing the template on a few pages—the ROI of a full crawl is questionable. Focus your resources on high-risk changes that affect thousands of URLs or alter how the content loads.

Infinite scrolling remains a risky bet in SEO. Even when well implemented, it complicates crawling, dilutes internal PageRank, and complicates traditional pagination. Assess whether the UX gains truly justify the organic risks.

Practical impact and recommendations

What should you concretely do before deploying a technical change?

Set up a staging environment that faithfully replicates production: same CMS, same server, same redirect rules. Crawl this environment with your usual SEO tool by configuring a Googlebot user-agent and enabling JavaScript rendering if necessary.

Compare the crawl results from the staging with a reference crawl of your current site. Track orphaned URLs, redirect chains, changes in depth, and newly duplicated content that emerged following the modification. Document every discrepancy in a tracking table and prioritize corrections before going live.

How can you specifically validate infinite scrolling from an SEO perspective?

Infinite scrolling should be accompanied by a clear URL architecture: each dynamically loaded “page” must correspond to an accessible URL directly (with classic pagination as a fallback). Test that these URLs are detected by your crawler with JavaScript enabled.

Ensure that internal links to this content exist in the initial HTML, not just after JS execution. Googlebot follows links, but its crawl budget does not allow it to explore indefinitely. If your products 50 to 100 only appear after 5 scrolls, they may never be crawled.

What mistakes should be avoided during the crawl test?

Don't just crawl the homepage: start the crawl from multiple entry points (categories, deep pages) to simulate Googlebot's real behavior arriving through different paths. A problem that is invisible from the homepage can block thousands of URLs accessible via other sections.

Avoid testing with artificial limits: if your site has 50,000 URLs, crawl at least 20,000 in staging. A crawl of 500 pages will never detect depth issues or loops that appear beyond the third layer of the hierarchy.

  • Crawl the staging with a Googlebot user-agent and JavaScript enabled prior to any deployment
  • Compare before/after: number of discovered URLs, average depth, crawl time
  • Validate that each dynamically loaded content corresponds to a directly accessible URL
  • Check server logs post-deployment to confirm that Googlebot is properly exploring the new URLs
  • Monitor crawl performance in Search Console: pages crawled/day, crawl budget used
  • Automate non-regression SEO tests in your CI/CD pipeline
Testing technical modifications through a prior crawl transforms a risky bet into an informed decision. You identify exploration issues before they impact your organic positions. For complex sites or major redesigns, this step becomes non-negotiable—and rightly so, a failed migration can take months to recover. If your team lacks expertise on these tests or if your technical infrastructure makes simulations complex, enlisting a specialized SEO agency can expedite diagnostics and secure deployment.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Un crawler SEO remplace-t-il complètement les tests manuels sur Search Console ?
Non. Le crawler anticipe les problèmes d'exploration, Search Console montre comment Google indexe réellement votre site. Les deux sont complémentaires : crawl en staging pour prévenir, GSC en production pour corriger.
Faut-il tester avec le même budget crawl que Googlebot utilise sur mon site ?
Impossible de connaître précisément votre budget crawl. Testez avec des limites réalistes (nombre de pages/seconde, profondeur max) et comparez ensuite avec vos logs serveur pour ajuster.
Le scrolling infini est-il compatible avec un bon crawl Google ?
Oui, à condition d'implémenter une pagination classique en fallback avec des URLs uniques pour chaque segment de contenu. Sans cela, Googlebot s'arrête après le premier écran visible.
Quels sont les indicateurs clés à surveiller lors d'un crawl de test ?
Nombre d'URLs découvertes, profondeur moyenne, codes HTTP rencontrés, temps de réponse, ressources bloquées, et URLs orphelines. Toute variation significative vs le crawl de référence est un signal d'alerte.
À quelle fréquence faut-il recrawler son site après une modification majeure ?
Crawlez juste avant déploiement, puis 48h et 7 jours après pour vérifier la stabilité. Ensuite, crawl mensuel pour détecter les régressions. Les sites e-commerce doivent crawler à chaque ajout massif de produits.
🏷 Related Topics
Content Crawl & Indexing AI & SEO

🎥 From the same video 13

Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 55 min · published on 17/10/2019

🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →

Related statements

💬 Comments (0)

Be the first to comment.

2000 characters remaining
🔔

Get real-time analysis of the latest Google SEO declarations

Be the first to know every time a new official Google statement drops — with full expert analysis.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.