Official statement
Other statements from this video 22 ▾
- 1:37 Faut-il vraiment arrêter d'utiliser l'outil d'inspection d'URL pour indexer vos pages ?
- 1:37 La qualité globale du site influence-t-elle vraiment la fréquence de crawl ?
- 2:22 Faut-il vraiment arrêter d'utiliser l'outil d'inspection d'URL pour indexer vos pages ?
- 9:02 Google combine-t-il vraiment les signaux hreflang entre HTML, sitemap et HTTP headers ?
- 9:02 Peut-on vraiment cibler plusieurs pays avec une seule page hreflang ?
- 10:10 Que se passe-t-il quand vos balises hreflang se contredisent entre HTML et sitemap ?
- 11:07 Faut-il utiliser rel=canonical entre plusieurs sites d'un même réseau pour éviter la dilution du signal ?
- 13:12 Les liens entre sites d'un même réseau sont-ils vraiment traités comme des liens normaux par Google ?
- 14:14 Les actions manuelles Google ciblent-elles vraiment un schéma global ou sanctionnent-elles aussi des cas isolés ?
- 16:54 La longueur de vos ancres impacte-t-elle vraiment votre référencement ?
- 18:10 Google réévalue-t-il vraiment les pages qui s'améliorent avec le temps ?
- 20:04 Les ancres de liens riches en mots-clés sont-elles vraiment un signal négatif pour Google ?
- 20:36 Google peut-il vraiment ignorer automatiquement vos liens sans vous prévenir ?
- 29:42 Google traduit-il votre contenu en anglais avant de l'indexer ?
- 30:44 Google traduit-il vos requêtes pour afficher du contenu en langue étrangère ?
- 32:00 Les avis clients anciens nuisent-ils au positionnement de vos fiches produit ?
- 33:21 Le volume de recherche sur votre marque booste-t-il vraiment votre SEO ?
- 34:34 Les iFrames sont-elles vraiment crawlées par Google ou faut-il les éviter en SEO ?
- 46:28 Comment vérifier si vos bannières cookies bloquent l'indexation Google ?
- 47:02 La page en cache reflète-t-elle vraiment ce que Google indexe ?
- 51:36 Comment gérer les multiples versions de documentation technique sans diluer votre SEO ?
- 54:12 Une action manuelle révoquée efface-t-elle vraiment toute trace de pénalité ?
Deleting your disavow file immediately reactivates all disavowed links, which become signals counted by Google again. The Web Spam team may then review these problematic backlinks and trigger a manual action if deemed manipulative. In practical terms: if you had disavowed toxic links, their removal from the file can reopen the door to a manual penalty. Only touch this file if you have a thorough understanding of your link profile.
What you need to understand
What does it really mean to be “treated as normal links”?
When you delete your disavow file, Google stops ignoring the links you previously disavowed. These backlinks revert to their original status: they pass PageRank, influence your link profile, and are counted in the ranking algorithms.
The engine retains no memory of your previous disavowal. It’s as if you never reported these problematic links. If some came from artificial link networks or link farms, they become active signals that the algorithms — and the Web Spam team — can detect again.
Why would the Web Spam team intervene after a deletion?
Mueller's statement reveals a rarely discussed point: deleting the disavow file can trigger a manual review. The Web Spam team monitors suspicious link profiles, and massively reactivating toxic backlinks acts as a warning signal.
Consider a site that had disavowed 500 links from PBNs or low-quality directories. Deleting the file reintegrates these 500 links into the active link graph. The algorithm detects this sharp change, and if the pattern resembles manipulation, a human reviewer may step in to apply a manual action.
When does this reactivation really become an issue?
Not all disavows are created equal. If you had disavowed a few links as a precaution without real danger, their reactivation probably won’t change anything. The risk pertains to sites that have massively cleaned up a toxic link profile through disavow after a Penguin penalty or a manual action.
Sectors historically affected by negative SEO or aggressive link-building campaigns (insurance, finance, health, gambling) need to be particularly careful. Reactivating hundreds of spammy links can pivot a site from a clean profile to a suspicious profile within just a few recrawl days.
- The disavow file does not remove links: it simply instructs Google to ignore them in its calculations
- Deleting the file = reversing this instruction, without retaining a history of the previous disavow
- The Web Spam team may trigger a manual action if the reactivated links violate guidelines
- The reactivation timeframe depends on the crawl and reprocessing of the link graph (possible several weeks)
- No automatic notification: Google does not warn you that it has detected the deletion of the file
SEO Expert opinion
Is this statement consistent with observed practices on the ground?
Absolutely. We regularly observe sites that delete their disavow file out of ignorance or after reading that it is “no longer necessary” since Penguin 4.0. The result: traffic drop within the next 2-4 weeks, with or without a manual action notification in Search Console.
The nuance that Google never clearly expressed: Penguin has become a real-time filter, but manual actions remain active. A link profile that escaped Penguin due to the disavow could very well trigger a manual penalty once the links are reactivated. Both systems coexist and do not react at the same thresholds.
What are the unspoken aspects of this statement?
Mueller does not specify the timeframe between deletion and potential manual review. Our on-the-ground observations suggest that the Web Spam team does not systematically scan all sites that delete their disavow — that would be unmanageable. [To be verified]: there could be an internal scoring system prioritizing at-risk sites (significant variation in the number of active backlinks, penalty history, sensitive sector).
Another vague point: what happens if you immediately reupload the same disavow file after deleting it? Does Google instantly reapply the disavow or do you have to wait for a new full processing cycle? The propagation times remain opaque, and Google has never documented precisely the timing for incorporating the disavow file.
In what cases does this rule not apply?
If your disavow file contained only a few domains disavowed due to excessive caution, deletion will probably have no measurable impact. The danger pertains to massively cleaned profiles: sites that suffered from negative SEO, sites that practiced aggressive link-building, domain migrations with a legacy of toxic links.
Additionally: sites that have never had a disavow file are obviously not concerned. And contrary to a common misconception, a site can rank well with an imperfect link profile if the content and overall authority compensate. The disavow is not a universal obligation — it is a last resort tool when manual cleaning fails.
Practical impact and recommendations
What should you do before even considering touching your disavow file?
Audit your entire current link profile with tools like Ahrefs, Majestic, or SEMrush. Compare the domains in your disavow file with the currently detected backlinks. Some links may have disappeared naturally (expired domains, 404 pages), while others may have been cleaned up at the source.
Next, assess the real risk level of each disavowed domain. A link from a generic directory does not carry the same toxic weight as a link from an PBN identified by Google. If 80% of your disavows concern links that are now harmless or disappeared, you could lighten the file rather than deleting it entirely.
What mistakes should you absolutely avoid?
Deleting the disavow file “to see what happens” is the worst possible approach. You cannot test without risk: once the file is deleted, the links are reactivated, and the algorithm starts processing them. It is impossible to instantly revert — even if you immediately reupload the file, processing will take several weeks.
Another classic mistake: believing that Penguin 4.0 has rendered the disavow obsolete. Penguin now filters spammy links in real-time, true, but that does not protect against manual actions for artificial links. The two systems coexist, and the latter remains active and unpredictable.
How should you proceed if you really need to modify your disavow file?
Never delete the entire file — opt for a surgical update. Identify the domains you wish to reactivate, remove them from the file, and upload the new version. Document every change: keep a history of disavow files with dates and reasons for the changes.
Then closely monitor your metrics in the following 4-6 weeks: positions on strategic keywords, overall organic traffic, notifications in Search Console. If you notice a decline, you can reinject the problematic domains into the file — but the propagation time will work against you.
- Download and archive your current disavow file before any modifications
- Audit your link profile with at least two different tools to cross-reference data
- Identify disavowed domains no longer appearing in your current backlink profile
- Assess the real toxicity level of each disavowed domain (spam score, anchors, context)
- Opt for a partial update rather than total deletion of the file
- Monitor Search Console and positions for at least 6 weeks after any modification
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Combien de temps après la suppression du fichier disavow les liens sont-ils réactivés ?
Puis-je supprimer mon fichier disavow si je n'ai jamais eu de pénalité ?
L'équipe Web Spam examine-t-elle systématiquement tous les sites qui suppriment leur disavow ?
Si je réuploade le fichier disavow juste après l'avoir supprimé, est-ce que cela annule la réactivation ?
Le fichier disavow protège-t-il contre Penguin ou contre les actions manuelles ?
🎥 From the same video 22
Other SEO insights extracted from this same Google Search Central video · duration 56 min · published on 27/11/2020
🎥 Watch the full video on YouTube →
💬 Comments (0)
Be the first to comment.